Folsom Countryhouse.
Folsom Countryhouse is Ranked in the top 1% of California memory care with no CDSS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 23 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Be first to know if Folsom Countryhouse's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Folsom Countryhouse's record and state requirements.
Nine complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The March 26, 2026 inspection cited one deficiency — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility holds a 60-bed license but does not carry a formal memory-care designation from CDSS — what specific dementia-care protocols are in place, and can you provide written documentation of those programs?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-26Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection of the facility, and the inspector found no violations. The home met all requirements for safe living spaces, food storage and preparation, medication security, emergency equipment, and staff documentation. Bedrooms and bathrooms were properly maintained, hazardous materials were locked away, and safety equipment was operational.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the facility unannounced and met with the Executive Director, Katherine Martinez, to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed three (3) bedrooms on the first floor, two (2) bedrooms on the second floor, and two (2) common area bathrooms. LPA observed apartments to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. The hot water temperature was observed to be 108 degrees F on the first floor and 107.5 degrees F on the second floor. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two-day perishable and (7) seven-day non-perishable food supply on hand. LPA observed knives, cleaning products and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the outdoor area and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris and there appeared to be no potential safety hazards to the residents in care. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are operational. Fire extinguishers and first aid kits are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed six (6) staff files. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.
2026-03-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced routine annual inspection was conducted at the facility. The inspector reviewed six resident files and found no violations of California regulations. The inspection will be completed at a future visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the facility unannounced and met with the Executive Director, Katherine Martinez, to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection. During today's visit, LPA reviewed six (6) resident files. As a result of today's visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA will return at a later time to conclude annual inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.
2025-03-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection on March 12, 2025, where the inspector reviewed resident and staff files, toured the facility including apartments and common areas, and found all required paperwork in order with no health or safety violations. Water temperatures in the apartments were within safe ranges, and the facility was asked to submit updated documentation to the Department by month's end.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived on March 12, 2025 to conduct the annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed five resident (5) and five staff (5) files. All residents files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA and ED Katherine Martinez toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included kitchen, hallways, memory care apartments, memory care dining room, and memory care common areas. Water temperatures in the apartments toured were within the required range of temperature. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. LPA requested a copy of the LIC 500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by end of the month. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was printed and given to ED.
2024-03-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection conducted on March 6, 2024, where the inspector reviewed resident and staff files, toured the facility including memory care apartments and common areas, and found all required paperwork and training in order. The inspector checked food safety, water temperature, and fire drills and observed no health or safety violations. No deficiencies were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived on 3/6/24 to conduct the annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (10) and staff (9) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA and Director of Nursing Brian Pawloski toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included, kitchen, hallways, memory care apartments, memory care dining room/kitchen, and memory care common areas. Food is within compliance. Water temperature is within the required range of temperature. Fire drills reviewed. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. LPA requested a copy of the LIC 500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by end of the month. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left at the facility.
2024-03-06Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a resident was sexually assaulted by staff in December 2022. The resident has dementia and could not provide details about the incident, and inspectors found no incident reports or other documentation to support the allegation. The complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Resident was raped in a facility During in investigation, it was reported that sometime in December 2022, R1 was inappropriately touched by staff at Folsom Countryhouse. During interviews, R1 was unable to provide details of the incident. It was noted that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia and when interviewed, R1 was unable to recall residing at Folsom Countryhouse or any incidents that occurred at the facility. File review documents were obtained and reviewed. There were no notes or Incident Reports regarding the alleged incident. Through interviews and record review, the Department could not find substantial evidence to support that the allegation occurred. The Department finds this allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED - meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report was left with Director of Nursing Brian Pawloski
2023-12-11Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found no evidence that staff failed to respond to call buttons in a timely manner, mismanaged medications, forced residents to shower against their will, or failed to provide adequate staffing—inspectors reviewed call logs, medication records, and facility schedules, and interviewed staff and residents. The facility was also found not to have had a fall incident involving the resident mentioned in the complaint. All allegations were unsubstantiated or unfounded.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Allegation- Staff does not respond to residents call pendant in a timely manner. The department conducted staff and residents' interviews, reviewed records to investigate the allegation. During interviews, staff stated that staff respond to resident call buttons in a timely manner, however, sometimes there is a delay in response due to staff assisting other resident’s needs. During facility observation on 11/8/23 and 11/20/23 and call log review, the department did not observe any long/extended wait times from staff to respond to resident's call button, therefore this allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Allegation- Staff mismanaged residents medication. Based on documents obtained and statements received, the department determined that there was insufficient evidence that staff did not properly maintain medication for residents in care. Documents reviewed show that all current medications were administered and logged correctly and were given to residents per their doctor's orders from 11/1/23-11/17/23. Based upon the information obtained during investigation, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Allegation- Staff forced resident to shower. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted it was determined by the department that (per facility policy) if residents refuse to shower, staff will redirect, come back a few minutes later, or change face. If all those steps are taken, and residents still refuse to shower, staff then document refusal in the residents’ charts. From records reviewed, the department observed that staff were documenting all shower related documentation per facility policy and were not forcing any residents to take showers if they refused. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Allegation- Facility does not have sufficient staff to provide care to residents. LPA has reviewed facility schedules which shows shifts are covered by multiple staff. There is no evidence to support the allegation that the facility does not have sufficient staff to provide care to residents. From records review, LPA learned that there are at least 2 direct care staff available on each floor during each shift for every day. Residents' interviews indicated that their needs are met, and the department finds no evidence that the current staff level is insufficient. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Allegation- Staff did not properly supervise resident resulting in a fall. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the department determined that R1 did not have any falls in the months of September, October, and November (2023). Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted and copy of this report has been provided.
2023-11-08Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff slapped a resident, intimidated them, and failed to report abuse; however, the investigation found no evidence to support these claims. No marks were found on the resident, law enforcement conducted their own investigation and did not substantiate the allegations, and interviews with other residents confirmed that staff treat people respectfully. The resident has a history of hallucinations and dementia and regularly makes statements about people hitting others.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff slapped resident Staff intimidated resident Staff did not report physical abuse of resident Staff do not treat clients with dignity and respect Based on records reviewed and interviews, it was determined that R1 was not slapped or abused by any staff at the facility. Based on interviews conducted, no marks were noticed on R1 after the incident was alleged. Records review indicated that R1 has a history of hallucinations and dementia and regularly says that someone is hitting someone. Law enforcement was involved, did their own investigation, and they did not substantiate the allegations above. Regarding staff not treating residents with dignity and respect, all residents interviewed stated that staff are very respectful to them and other residents, and no one had issues with staff. Staff and resident interviews did not indicate any physical abuse happening at the facility. Based on all this information, all above allegations are UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted with Director of Nursing and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2023-10-11Complaint InvestigationNo findings
5 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Sacramento County.
Other memory care facilities in Sacramento County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

