Las Villas del Norte.
Las Villas del Norte is Ranked in the top 35% of California memory care with 6 CDSS citations on record; last inspected May 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Las Villas del Norte has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Las Villas del Norte's record and state requirements.
Las Villas del Norte holds an active CDSS license for 198 beds but has no inspection reports on file — can you explain why no state inspections have been recorded, and provide documentation of your current license status and any pending initial certification visits?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility is operator-advertised as memory care but does not carry a formal memory-care designation in CDSS licensing records — does the facility hold itself out as specializing in dementia care, and if so, can you provide the written dementia-care program required by Title 22 §87705?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Zero complaints and zero deficiencies appear in the public record — can you confirm the date of the most recent CDSS inspection visit, and provide families with a copy of the most recent inspection report or licensing survey results?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
18 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-05-30Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced annual inspection on May 30, 2025, inspectors found no violations or health and safety concerns at the facility. The three-building campus—which includes independent living, assisted living, and memory care units—met all requirements for food storage, medication security, cleaning supply storage, and fire safety equipment, with clean and sanitary resident bedrooms observed throughout. The facility has also installed additional safety measures in the memory care unit, including protective covers on fire alarm stations and a gate alarm to alert staff when exits are opened.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 5/30/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrative Executive Director, Reu Baggao who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The facility has a fire clearance for 198 non-ambulatory elderly residents, of which 86 may be bedridden. LPA toured the facility’s interior and exterior with Baggao. During the tour, LPA observed the facility is made up of three (3) buildings, which are designated for independent living, assisted living, and memory care. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. Outdoor shaded seating is available and there are several activities available for resident leisure. The facility has an in-ground pool that is gated and secured with a master lock. During tour of the kitchen, LPA observed the facility met Departmental requirements for a two-day supply of perishable foods and seven-day non-perishable food items, and sharps are secured and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications are secured in medication carts, only accessible to authorized personnel such as medication technicians. Cleaning solutions and disinfectants are secured in storage closets, inaccessible to the residents. LPA toured a sample of the resident bedrooms and private restrooms in the memory care unit, which appeared to be clean and sanitary with no foul odors. LPA also observed the facility installed protective covers to all of the memory care unit fire alarm pull stations. Baggao lifted one of the covers and showed LPA the warning horn that was placed as a preventative measure to help staff detect and possibly prevent false fire alarms. Baggao also showed LPA the new siren alarm installed on the courtyard gate to alert staff when the gate has been unexpectedly opened. LPA observed several fire extinguishers mounted throughout the facility that were last serviced on 4/21/2025 along with fire alarm systems and carbon monoxide detectors. During today's visit, no deficiencies were cited and LPA did not observe any health or safety concerns identified on 10/20/2023's non-compliance conference. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to AED Baggao.
2025-04-16Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
On April 16, 2025, the state conducted an unannounced inspection following a report that a resident in the memory care unit left the facility on April 4 after a fire alarm was pulled, which automatically disarmed exit doors; law enforcement located the resident a mile away and returned them safely with no injuries noted. The facility's records showed the resident had a documented history of elopement and required assistance to leave safely, and a second resident had also left the facility after a fire alarm was pulled on March 30. The state will assess civil penalties as a result of these incidents.
“Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the fire alarm was pulled which disarmed all exit doors resulting in R1 eloping from the facility with no staff supervision. R1 was located by law enforcement a mile away from the facility. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) submitted by the facility reporting Resident 1 (R1) eloped from the facility on 4/4/2025. LPA was informed Administrator, Jolene Farish was not present in the facility and unavailable to meet with LPA. As a result, LPA met with Administrative Executive Director (AED), Reu Baggao and Resident Services Director (RSD), Ana Ramirez who were informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted an interview with AED and RSD who reported on 4/4/2025 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the fire alarm near room 502 (memory care unit) was pulled, which caused all exit doors to be automatically disarmed. Facility staff conducted a resident head count and discovered R1 missing. Staff reported R1 was last seen 10 minutes prior to the fire alarm being pulled. The facility contacted law enforcement who located R1 a mile away from the facility. R1 was returned to the facility by Administrator Farish and RSD. R1 was assessed by paramedics and no apparent injuries were noted. LPA reviewed R1's Physician's Report (LIC 602A) dated 1/13/2025 noting R1 is unable to leave the facility unassisted. LPA also reviewed R1's appraisal dated 1/19/2025 noting concerns due to R1 having a history of eloping. LPA toured the facility with RSD and observed six (6) fire alarm pull stations with lid covers available for emergencies. LPA reviewed the facility's staff schedule for the week of 3/30/2025 noting four (4) caregivers were present on 4/4/2025 when the incident occurred. On 3/30/2025, Resident 2 also eloped from the facility/memory care unit after one of the fire alarms was pulled. As a result, civil penalties will be assessed during today's visit. No additional health or safety concerns were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC 809-D, Confidential Names list (LIC 811), LIC421FC, and Appeal Rights were reviewed and provided to AED.
2025-04-03Annual Compliance VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
On March 30, 2025, a resident left the facility unsupervised after staff failed to secure a courtyard gate during a fire alarm drill; the resident was found and returned by law enforcement about three hours later with no injuries. The facility reported the incident on time, conducted staff retraining on elopement procedures, and installed a new alarm system for the courtyard gate. The state cited the facility for this incident, though inspectors found no other health or safety concerns at the time of the visit.
“Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility staff failed to ensure the courtyard gate was secured after knowing all doors had been disarmed. Furthermore, R1 eloped from the facility with no staff supervision and was returned by law enforcement. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/3/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) submitted by the facility reporting Resident 1 (R1) eloped from the facility on 3/30/2025. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish and Memory Care Director (MCD), Lorena Vivar who were informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted an interview with Administrator Farish and MCD Vivar and both reported the following information. On 3/30/2025 at approximately 6:00 a.m., Resident 2 pulled the fire alarm disarming all exit doors, which were secured with electric magnetic lock systems. At the time, all residents were accounted for and caregivers assessed and secured all exit doors except the courtyard gate. The doors leading to the courtyard gate were not disarmed as they require a keyed entry and were locked when the fire alarm was pulled. As a result, caregivers reportedly overlooked/failed to ensure the courtyard gate was secured. At approximately 5:30 p.m., Staff 1 went to R1's room to check on them but was unable to locate them. Staff conducted a thorough search of the facility but were unable to locate R1. Staff found the courtyard gate closed but unsecured. The facility notified local law enforcement and R1's responsible person. Caregivers reported last seeing R1 at approximately 5:00 p.m. At approximately 8:00 p.m., R1 was returned to the facility by law enforcement. Upon arrival, R1 was assessed and no visible injuries were noted. LPA reviewed R1's Physician's Report (LIC 602A) dated 7/25/2024 noting R1 is unable to leave the facility unassisted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The facility has since conducted an in-service staff training regarding fire alarm and elopement procedures and purchased a new siren alarm for the courtyard gate. On 3/31/2025, LPA received a voicemail from Administrator Farish reporting the incident. LPA reviewed the facility's training and Elopement Drill Records dated 9/24/2024, 12/19/2024 and 2/26/2025 noting the facility conducted routine elopement drills. Although the facility met the reporting requirements timely, trained their staff, and took appropriate action upon learning of the incident, the facility will be cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) regulation 87705(e)(5). During today's visit, LPA did not observe any health or safety concerns. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Appeal Rights were reviewed and provided to Administrator Farish and MCD Vivar along with Confidential Names list (LIC 811), LIC 809-D.
2025-01-10Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated about a Norovirus outbreak at the facility in late December 2024. The facility notified residents and families about the outbreak, provided staff with training on hand washing and cleaning, and consistently disinfected common areas; the resident who filed the complaint reported that meals were served safely with staff wearing gloves and masks, and the facility appeared clean. No violation was found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Administrator Farish was interviewed and reported several residents and staff experienced symptoms of Norovirus beginning 12/30/2024, and all residents and their responsible persons were notified of the outbreak at the facility. Administrator reported the written notification requested visitors wash their hands before and after leaving the facility as a safety precaution for residents and staff. Administrator added they also placed copies of the written notification in common areas including near the main entrance where visitors sign in. Administrator explained upon discovery of the outbreak, facility staff received additional training regarding proper hand washing techniques and cleaning protocols. Administrator reported facility staff consistently disinfected high-touch surfaces in common areas throughout the facility. LPA reviewed a copy of the written notification which noted the request for visitors to wash their hands before and after leaving the facility. LPA interviewed three (3) staff who were present during the alleged incident date, and all reported on 1/2/2025, they regularly washed their hands and wore gloves when serving residents and their visitors food. LPA reviewed the facility’s Inservice Record Sheet dated 12/30/2024 signed by staff along with the training material which noted staff were trained on safe practices to prevent and address Norovirus and other gastrointestinal illness outbreaks. LPA also reviewed the facility’s Course Completion History dated 1/10/2025 noting staff completed training regarding food safety. LPA conducted an interview with the alleged victim who reported the meal provided by the facility tasted fine and they observed facility servers wear gloves and face masks when serving meals. The alleged victim added the facility did not appear unsanitary. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator Farish. *This is an amended version of the original report.
2024-12-12Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation from July 2021 looked into two allegations at the memory care unit: one about how a staff member discussed a death (which could not be substantiated) and one about ants found on a resident and in their bedding (which was substantiated). The facility failed to provide safe living conditions when ants were present in the resident's immediate environment.
“Based on records and interviews the licensee did not provide healfull and comfortable accomodations in 1 of 51 persons in the memory care unit which posed a potential Personal Rights risk to persons in care”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(continued form 9099) In July of 2021, it was reported to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) that the Licensee representative spoke improperly about death to the reporting party, not to R1. Interviews with staff and outside sources were not able to provide any information to support or deny the complaint allegation. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director XXXX, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (continued from 9099) According to regulation CCR 87468 (titled "Personal Rights"), Licensee was required to provide “safe and healthful living accommodations.” In July of 2021, it was reported to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Resident #1(R1)(See LIC 811 for confidential name) had ants crawling on their person and their bedding while residing in the memory care unit (Generations) of the facility. The Department was able to locate individuals who had been present at the facility during the time period identified in the complaint allegation. Interviews with outside sources and staff revealed ants were present inside the memory care unit of the facility during the time identified in the complaint allegations. Interviews with staff and an outside source revealed they observed R1 to have ants crawling on their person and in their bedding. The Department has investigated the allegation that Licensee did not provide healthful accommodations for resident and has found that, based upon evidence found during interviews and record review, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. This deficiency is noted on the attached 9099-D and is cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights, An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director XXXX, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).
2024-10-21Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged long wait times for meals and rude staff behavior. During the inspection, most residents reported waiting over an hour for meals, though some said waits were brief, and none reported going without food; the inspector observed a meal served within six minutes during lunch. The facility attributed delays to residents arriving before scheduled meal times or requesting custom dishes, and the complaint could not be proven or disproven based on available evidence.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
CSD explained some residents arrive to the dining room approximately one (1) hour before daily menu options are scheduled to be served and consider it waiting time, however meals from the daily menu are not ready until the scheduled serving times. CSD also explained if many residents request a custom meal or options from the alternative menu, this may delay food orders for a few minutes but not an hour and half. Three (3) of five (5) residents interviewed reported waiting over an hour to receive their meals on a daily basis, but were unable to report whether they arrive to the dining room an hour before meals are scheduled to be served or if they request a custom meal. Two (2) of five (5) residents interviewed refuted the allegation and reported they only wait a few minutes for their meals to be served. All five (5) residents interviewed reported they have never walked away from the dining room without a meal due to extensive wait times. Five (5) residents interviewed reported facility staff do not yell at them and are not rude, including S1 and S2. Only one (1) of five (5) staff interviewed reported having knowledge of S1 yelling at a resident but they were unable to identify the resident or provide a description of the resident. During today's visit, LPA sat in the dining room during lunch time and did not observe any residents waiting for meals to be served for an extended period of time. LPA shared a dining room table with Resident 1 and observed their lunch was served six (6) minutes after they placed their order with the server. Based on the aforementioned, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Farish.
2024-09-20Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A state licensing official made an unannounced follow-up visit on September 20, 2024, to check on issues that had been flagged at a previous conference in October 2023. The facility had working utilities, adequate food and staffing, and the inspector did not find the health or safety problems that had been identified before.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 9/20/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility to follow up on concerns identified in the Non-Compliance Conference (NCC) held on 10/20/2023. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish and Resident Care Director, Ana Ramirez who were informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a walk-through of the facility with Administrator Farish for any health or safety concerns. During the tour, LPA observed residents relaxing in their rooms and in common areas. The facility was working utilities, required food supply, and adequate staffing. During today's visit, LPA did not observe any health or safety concerns as identified on 10/20/2023's NCC. An exit interview was conducted and a copy this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator Farish.
2024-08-20Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated about residents getting sick from food left out at the facility. Eight of nine staff members interviewed said they had no knowledge of this happening, and there was not enough evidence to prove it occurred, so that allegation was unsubstantiated. However, inspectors found that housekeeping staff were not cleaning the memory care unit as required during a visit on July 31, 2024, due to staffing shortages, and the facility was cited for this violation; the facility has since hired additional housekeeping staff.
“LPA observed 6 of 9 resident bedrooms/bathrooms toured appeared to have feces stuck inside the toilet bowls, on the toilet seats, on the bathroom floor, and/or on the outside bedroom door handles. This poses a potential health/safety/personal rights risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Eight (8) of nine (9) interviews conducted reported not having knowledge of residents getting sick after eating food that is left out. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Farish. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Administrator, Jolene Farish was interviewed and reported the facility had five (5) housekeepers and recently faced a housekeeping shortage due to one (1) housekeeper retiring, one (1) going on leave unexpectedly, and one (1) going on vacation for two (2) weeks. LPA reviewed the July 2024 staff schedule for the housekeepers, which indicates two (2) housekeepers were assigned to MCU on 7/31/2024. On 7/31/2024, RCD Ramirez reported Staff 1 (S1) was assigned as the housekeeper for MCU that day. On 7/31/2024, LPA Romero was in the MCU from approximately 10:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m and did not observe S1 or any other housekeeping staff cleaning the MCU. During LPA’s visit on 7/31/2024, RD Condie had S1 go to the MCU to begin cleaning the six (6) resident bedrooms/bathrooms toured identified to require cleaning. RD Condie reported the MCU would be thoroughly cleaned. Administrator Farish reported the facility has hired a new housekeeper and is in the process of filling the remaining vacancies. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Farish.
2024-07-15Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that the facility failed to provide hot water and maintain cleanliness. Investigators interviewed staff and residents, reviewed maintenance records, toured the facility, and found no violations—residents and staff confirmed hot water was available and the facility was clean and well-maintained.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
LPA interviewed staff members and residents and no issues were advised with being able to use the hot water. LPA interviewed Facility Maintenance Manager, Michael Vitalli and advised that there was a maintenance issue regarding the hot water heater, but that the maintenance issue did not affect the resident’s ability to use hot or cold water. LPA was unable to interview additional witnesses. LPA reviewed records of the hot water heater repair made on 06/13/2024. The repair was done in a reasonable amount of time. In regards to the allegations that the facility did not ensure that the facility was clean or sanitized, LPA interviewed Building Services Director, Christian Herbert. Herbert stated there are 2 housekeepers that complete cleaning tasks at the facility every day from 7:30 to 4:00. LPA reviewed house keeper’s logs at random date during June and all the assigned cleanings appeared to be completed. LPA also interviewed housekeepers who indicated there are no issues with cleaning or sanitizing the facility. LPA also toured the facility and did not observe any safety concerns, regarding cleaning or sanitizing violations. Information obtained from interviews with residents indicated there were no issues or concerns with the facility being clean or sanitized. Based on the LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review regarding the allegations that Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided with hot water while in care and does not ensure that the facility is clean or sanitized, these allegations are unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint allegations and we have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, was discussed with and provided to the Executive Director, Jolene M. Farish,
2024-06-14Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a follow-up inspection on June 14, 2024, to check on issues that had been identified at a previous meeting in October 2023. The inspector toured the facility and found no health or safety problems, and observed that the building had working utilities, adequate food supplies, and sufficient staff.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 6/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility to follow up on concerns identified in the Non-Compliance Conference (NCC) held on 10/20/2023. LPA met with Administrative Executive Director (AED), Reu Baggao who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a walk-through of the facility with Administrative AED Baggao for any health or safety concerns. During the tour, LPA observed residents relaxing in their rooms and in common areas. The facility was working utilities, required food supply, and adequate staffing. During today's visit, LPA did not observe any health or safety concerns as identified on the NCC held on 10/20/2023. An exit interview was conducted and a copy this report was reviewed and provided to AED Baggao.
2024-04-22Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A state licensing analyst made an unannounced visit on April 22, 2024 and found that all three staff members reviewed had not completed the required 12 hours of dementia care training, with six hours required before working independently with residents and six more hours due within the first four weeks. The facility will receive a citation for this training deficiency. The executive director was informed of the findings and provided with information about appeal rights.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/22/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made a unannounced case management deficiencies visit. LPA met with Executive Director Jolene Farish and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a review of three (3) Generations (Memory Care) staff files and training transcripts which revealed three (3) out of three (3) staff to not have receive twelve (12) hours of dementia care training, six (6) of which shall be completed before a staff member begins working independently with residents, and the remaining six hours of which shall be completed within the first four weeks of employment. All 12 hours shall be devoted to the care of persons with dementia. Based on records review a citation will be issued on the attached 809 D, in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report, 809 D, appeal rights and LIC9098 were reviewed and provided to Jolene Farish, Executive Director.
2024-04-12Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was an annual inspection of the facility on April 12, 2024, and no violations were found. The inspector confirmed that safety systems including fire alarms and carbon monoxide detectors are current, medications and hazardous materials are properly secured, food storage meets requirements, and residents have access to activities and dietary accommodations. The facility currently serves 198 residents across independent living, assisted living, and memory care buildings, with 10 residents receiving hospice care.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/12/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility’s interior and exterior with Administrator Farish. During the tour, LPA observed the facility is made up of three (3) buildings, which are designated for independent living, assisted living, and memory care. The facility is licensed for 198 non-ambulatory residents of which 86 may be bedridden. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for 28 residents and LPA was informed the facility currently has 10 residents receiving hospice services. The facility has an in-ground pool on the premises that is properly gated and secured with a master lock. Outside shaded seating is also available for resident use. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. LPA observed fire alarm systems, carbon monoxide detectors, and charged fire extinguishers serviced on 3/13/2024. LPA toured the kitchen, walk-in refrigerator and dry food storage room and observed food was stored in a safe and healthful manner. The facility met Departmental requirements for a 2-day supply of perishable foods and 7-day supply of non-perishable food items. Resident interviews revealed kitchen staff accommodate residents’ dietary needs and there are several activities and outings available for resident leisure. Medications and residents’ medical files are stored in wellness rooms. Medications are secured in medication carts, only accessible to authorized personnel such as facility nurses and medication technicians. Cleaning solutions and disinfectants are secured in a storage closet. Knives and sharp instruments are stored in the kitchen, inaccessible to the residents. The facility is in the process of removing hallway carpets and adding new flooring. During today’s visit, LPA did not issue any deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator Farish. There are no health and safety concerns observed as identified on the non-compliance conference held on 10/20/2023
2024-01-04Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility overcharged a resident $3,400 in monthly care fees due to a clerical error while the resident was absent from the facility for an extended period; the facility's admission agreement required a pro-rated credit for absences longer than fourteen consecutive days, but this credit was not applied. The facility did not act in bad faith, and the overcharge has been addressed. The facility has been cited for this billing violation.
“Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not complye with the requirement noted above by overcharging Resident 1 for care. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
This confirms the facility is to issue a pro-rated credit towards R1’s monthly care fees if the resident was absent from the facility for more than fourteen consecutive days. R1 was absent from the facility on April 17, 2023 – July 7, 2023. Per the admission agreement, R1 was to receive a pro-rated credit for monthly care fees. LPA found that due to a clerical error, R1 was overcharged $3,400.00 in monthly care fees during R1's absence from the facility. Although LPA determined that the overcharge did not occur due to the facility operating in bad faith, the allegation of "Staff overcharged resident for care" is valid. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation was found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The facility will be cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, regulation 87507(f). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Farish along with a Confidential Names List (LIC 811) and LIC9099-D. *This is an amended version of the original report.
2023-12-29Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced health and safety check was conducted on December 29 in response to previous concerns about resident care. Inspectors found no health or safety issues, observed adequate staffing and supervision, saw that resident rooms met requirements, and confirmed that bathing services were available (with residents able to refuse and refusals documented). No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On December 29, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson conducted an unannounced case management Health and Safety Check. LPA Mixson met with the Residential Care Coordinator, Normalin Paulo and introduced herself and stated the purpose of the visit. Today's visit is in response to previous information received by Community Care Licensing regarding the health and safety of the residents in care. LPA Mixson conducted a Health and Safety check at the facility. There were no health or safety issues identified. LPA Mixson requested and received pertinent documents. LPA Mixson observed a sample of the residents rooms and the rooms had the required furnishings per the regulations. There were sufficient staff to resident for supervision and the staff were engaging the residents in activities, the meal of the day, and medications were being distributed. LPA Mixson interviewed the facility nurse and the asked who is in charge of bathing the residents and the nurse stated there are four caregivers, one nurse, and two med techs on the assisted living side. They get assistance about twice a week but some residents only request for once a week. There are some residents who may be scheduled for three times a week but they have the right to refuse and if they do refuse it is logged. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the RCC, Normalin Paulo.
2023-12-01Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that residents became sick with diarrhea from contaminated lasagna and that the facility had inadequate food supplies. The investigation found no evidence to support these claims: staff reported a stomach virus was circulating, the chef confirmed all food is eaten by both staff and residents with no reported poisoning, and the kitchen was well-stocked with food and supplies documented by four months of grocery receipts.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Cont'd from LIC9099.... R5 also stated they believe the lasagna served last week could have caused food poisoning among some of the residents, and that a number of residents have been sick with diarrhea since last week. Of the five (5) staff interviewed, all indicated there is a stomach virus that is going around, and some residents have been sick however, it is not related to food service. LPA conducted an interview with the facility chef who stated all meals are eaten by both staff and residents, and that none of the staff members have reported food poisoning. The facility chef also stated they have always maintained an ample supply of quality food and have never substituted water for milk in cereal. Facility chef further stated the only time they have had a milk shortage was approximately two months ago, there was a mix up with the delivery of milk. He further reported they immediately made a run to a local grocery store across the street to obtain milk, and it was replenished the same day. LPA toured the kitchen and observed an ample supply of both perishable and non-perishable food and drink. LPA also reviewed pertinent documents from the facility that included a four (4) month supply of grocery receipts from June 2023 through September 2023. Review of receipts show a consistent supply of food and drinks were purchased prior to the allegation. Based on observation, interviews, and records review, the allegation that the facility does not have adequate food supply, is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. This is an amended version of the original report crafted on 12/01/2023.
2023-10-05Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A state licensing analyst made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct interviews as part of an investigation at another care facility. No violations were found during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Collateral Visit. LPA was greeted by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Receptionist Cindy Villasenor. LPA then met and spoke with Executive Director Jolene Farish. During today’s visit, LPA conducted resident interviews to aid in an investigation occurring at another licensed care facility. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Farish, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.
2023-09-19Complaint InvestigationMixedType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation that found mixed results. Inspectors substantiated one allegation about a brownish crusted stain, citing violations of state regulations, but did not find enough evidence to substantiate the allegation that the resident was not fed regularly—records showed the resident could feed themselves, staff reported good appetite, medical records indicated some weight fluctuation over the year but no clear pattern of neglect, and the resident's family reported satisfaction with meals.
“The licensee did not ensure personal rights were maintained for residents. Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, R1 was found injured sitting on top of a mattress stored in their bathroom. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(CONTINUED FROM LIC9099-A) brownish colored stain which was thick enough to be crusted in some areas. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list and Appeal Rights. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (CONTINUED FROM LIC-9099) checked on every thirty (30) minutes. Review of R1's Physician's Report, Level of Care Assessments, and Progress Notes did not indicate R1 required direct supervision. LPA attempted to interview R1 however, R1 did not verbally respond to LPA's presence or inquires. Interview with R1's responsible party revealed they are happy with the care R1 is provided. Regarding the allegation "Resident is not fed regularly", it was alleged that R1 was noted to have severe weight loss. Review of R1's Physician's Report dated 8/29/2022 revealed R1 was able to feed themselves. Review of R1's Level of Care Assessment dated 5/12/2023 revealed R1 only required reminders of meal times but did not require assistance with feeding. Review of R1's Weight Record for June 2022 to May, 20, 2023 revealed R1's weight was 146 lbs. on 6/1/2022. R1's weight was noted to be 133 lbs. on 5/20/2023 indicating a weight loss of thirteen (13) pounds in nearly one (1) year's time. The weight record also indicated three (3) separate instances of weight gain following weight loss during that same period. Six (6) of six (6) staff interviewed reported R1 had a good appetite and ate well. LPA attempted to interview R1 however, R1 did not verbally respond to LPA's presence or inquires. Interview with R1's responsible party revealed the food R1 is provided at the facility is very good and that R1 was fed well. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list. *THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT
2023-08-03Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged the facility wrongfully withheld a resident's refund. The facility had issued a refund check to the resident directly, though someone handling the resident's finances had requested it be made to their name instead; the facility provided tracking information for the check and added a $100 credit to the resident's account. The investigation found no violation occurred—the facility had properly issued the refund to the resident as required.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
R1’s Admission Agreement confirms the facility is to issue a pro-rated credit towards R1’s monthly care fees if the resident was absent from the facility for more than fourteen consecutive days. R1 was absent from the facility on April 17, 2023 – July 7, 2023, which would entitle R1 to receive a pro-rated credit for monthly care fees, not a refund. Administrator Farish verbally agreed to accommodate and provide a refund for R1. LPA found that the facility issued a refund check in R1's name; however, the individual handling R1's finances requested the check be made to their name, which delayed the refund process. LPA found that the individual handling R1’s finances was not listed as the Power of Attorney agent or responsible person for R1. LPA determined that the facility did not intentionally withhold R1’s refund and instead issued the refund to R1 directly rather than the person handling R1's finances. The individual handling R1's finances was provided the overnight FedEx tracking number for the check refund. Per the admission agreement, R1 was not entitled to a refund, only a pro-rated credit for monthly care fees. However, the facility provided a refund for R1 and added a $100.00 credit to R1’s account for any inconvenience. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegation that "Staff are not providing resident with a refund" was found to be Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Farish along with a Confidential Names List (LIC 811). *This is an amended version of the original report.
16 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in San Diego County.
Other memory care facilities in San Diego County with similar care offerings.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.


