Escondido Senior Living.
Escondido Senior Living is Ranked in the top 37% of California memory care with 4 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Nov 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Escondido Senior Living has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Escondido Senior Living's record and state requirements.
The facility holds license 374603451 with 143 beds and no inspection reports on file with CDSS — can you provide the initial licensing inspection documentation and any subsequent compliance visits conducted since licensure?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
No complaints or deficiencies appear in the CDSS public record for this facility — can you share your internal incident log and show families how you document and track any resident or family concerns raised directly with management?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The operator, Pacifica North Cnty & Pac N Cnty; North County Mgr, runs this 143-bed facility without formal memory-care designation in CDSS licensing records — do you accept residents with dementia diagnoses, and if so, what specific care protocols differentiate those residents from general assisted living?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
11 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-11-07Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a required annual inspection on November 7, 2025, the facility was found to be clean and safe, with proper medication storage, working fire safety equipment, and appropriate water temperatures. Two violations were cited: the facility did not have a staff member with valid CPR certification on site at all times, and it was caring for more residents than it was approved to serve. All other areas reviewed, including resident files, staff qualifications, and emergency preparedness, met requirements.
“Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 3 times. Per interview conducted all staffs CPR have expired, with the exception of (3), Administrator,AM , NOC staff with valid CPR however, it does not meet the requirement, as there is no PM staff and the staff do not work 7 days a week, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/08/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The licensee agrees to scehdule a CPR certification training with a preferred vendor, and have staff complete the training. Proof of POC is to be submitted to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.”
“Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 14 of 14 persons. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for ten (10) with no additional exception requests on file which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/21/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The licensee agrees to submit a request for hospice waiver increase or exception to receive hospice services for the outstanding 14 residents. Proof of POC is to be submitted to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/07/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a 1 year required visit. LPA met with Jessica Playa, Executive Director. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for (10) with (24) residents currently receiving hospice services, and an approved fire clearance for (10) bedridden residents, with currently (4) bed bound residents in care. There is total of (7) residents receiving home health services. The facility was observed to be clean with the passageways being free of any obstructions. The medications, chemicals and sharps were observed to be locked an inaccessible to residents in care. The fire extinguishers were last serviced on 03/19/25. The emergency disaster drills are being conducted on a quarterly basis with the last drill being on 10/27/25. The hot water was tested and was in within regulatory limits ranging from 105.1-114.6 in assisted living and 105.3-108.1 in memory care. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operable. A records review was conducted, the facility annual fees were observed to have been paid, and for the governing body to be in good standing. The resident files were observed to have medical assessments and, and completed admissions agreements. The staff files reviewed were observed to have criminal record clearance and to be associated to the facility. The staff files reviewed were observed to have been completed initial and ongoing training, however there was an insufficient number of staff to have a staff with valid Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation certification on the premises at all times. deficiency cited. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Due to the facility having more residents receiving services in their care than approved for a citation is also being issued in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), on the attached 809D. There are no guns or ammunition on the premises. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report 809C, 809D, and appeal rights was reviewed and provided to Jessica Playa, Executive Director.
2025-03-28Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a staff member may have misplaced a resident's partial dentures, which cost $4,480 to replace. The facility's handbook states it is not responsible for personal items not listed on the resident's property form, though the dentures were documented on the resident's intake paperwork. The facility began an internal investigation in February 2025 but there is no record of follow-up or resolution.
“R1 dentures being lost by facility staff. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
dentures, if the dentures were lost by one of the facility staff. Per an interview with Executive Director Jessica Playa and Shawna Emery, Resident Care Coordinator Staff #1 (S1) admitted that they may have misplaced R1s dentures. Additionally, LPA conducted a records review and the resident handbook states "we cannot be responsible for any items brought into the facility that is not listed on the resident personal property and values form". LPA reviewed R1s personal property and values sheet dated 9/22/24, and it does note for R1 to have partial dentures. Further LPA reviewed correspondence an email dated 2/12/25 which included an invoice stating the replacement dentures would cost $4,480.00. The next email reviewed dated 2/19/25 shows that the facility was going to conduct an internal investigation, and there is no further written correspondence to date in regards to the matter. Based on observation, interview and records review the allegation of Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A citation will be issued in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 9099D, appeal rights and LIC811-Confidential names list was reviewed and provided to Jessica Playa, Executive Director.
2025-02-13Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff left residents in soiled clothing and the facility had odor problems. An investigator interviewed the resident and staff, toured the room, and reviewed logs, and found no evidence to support the complaint—the resident refuses showers and bedding changes, which staff have documented, but there were no observed odors or hygiene issues in the room. The complaint was determined to be unfounded.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Information obtained from interview with R1 corroborated that they refuse to be showered and allow staff to change their bedding. R1 denied that there are odors coming from their room. It was further advised that R1 does not have any issues or concerns. Information from additional witness corroborated the information that they are aware of R1’s refusals to be showered and change their bedding. During a visit, LPA conducted a room tour of R1’s room and observed and no issues were observed. LPA also observed R1’s refusals on logs dated from the month of November 2023, December 2023 and January 2024 . Based on information obtained through interviews, review of documents, and observation, this agency has investigated the complaint alleging facility staff left residents in soiled clothing and facility staff do not keep the facility free of odors. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to Sales Director, Carline Callaghan.
2025-02-06Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation looked into three allegations: that staff forced residents to wear double briefs, that staff chemically restrained a resident by giving them a supplement, and that the facility had a bed bug infestation and failed to address it. Staff and physicians reported they had not observed double briefing or chemical restraint, and the facility provided documentation showing it hired a professional pest control company in August 2023, conducted multiple heat treatments in residents' rooms, purchased new mattresses, and obtained its own bed bug heater to treat affected areas. The investigator found no preponderance of evidence to prove any of the alleged violations occurred.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
R3 declined to be interviewed. Three (3) staff were interviewed, and all reported they have never observed residents wear two (2) briefs at a time and had knowledge some residents request to add an incontinent pad to their brief. A witness interview was conducted with R1 and R2’s physician who reported they have never observed any residents at the facility wear two (2) briefs or report they are forced/encouraged to double brief. R1 and R2’s physician added they are not aware double briefing causes any medical issues or increases the risk of skin breakdown. R1 and R2’s physician reported for the past five (5) years they have never observed or suspected any of their patients residing in the facility to be neglected by facility staff. Regarding the allegation, “Staff chemically restrained resident” it was alleged on an unknown date, facility staff chemically restrained Resident 4 (R4) by administering a specific supplement after breakfast. R4 declined to be interviewed. LPA reviewed R4’s Physician's Report (LIC 602A) dated 5/23/22 noting R4 has the capacity to communicate their needs and administer their own Pro-Re-Nata medications. LPA also reviewed R4’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2023, which listed the supplement in question to be administered as needed at bedtime. One (1) of three (3) staff interviewed reported being authorized to dispense medications, refuted the allegation, and reported the supplement in question is only dispensed at night and at the request of R4. Two (2) of three (3) staff interviewed reported they have never suspected facility staff are over medicating residents or not following medication orders. Regarding the allegation, “Facility has an infestation of bed bugs” it was alleged there is a bed bug infestation in R1’s room and the facility has not obtained professional pest control services. It was further alleged the facility attempted to treat the affected areas themselves but has been unsuccessful. R1 was interviewed and reported in the past, they experienced bed bugs in their room. R1 added they reported sights of bed bugs to the executive director who resolved the issue. R1 reported their room underwent treatment twice and the facility worked diligently to eliminate the bed bugs. The facility reported Western Exterminator Company (WEC) completed an initial inspection of the building on 7/27/2023. An agreement was signed between the facility and WEC on 8/4/2023 and WEC began ongoing treatments on 8/15/2023. LPA reviewed the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 facility’s Heat Treatments log which noted R1’s room received a heat treatment on 8/22/23, 11/13/23, and 11/27/23. LPA reviewed a proposal dated 12/8/2023, prepared by the Western Exterminator Company (WEC) addressed to the facility. The service specifications noted bed bug heat treatment to various infested resident rooms including R1’s. An interview with Maintenance Director (MD), Roy Hayes revealed the facility owns a heater to treat bed bugs and will immediately treat any areas reported to have bed bug activity in addition to canine bed bug inspections and chemical spray/heat treatments provided by WEC. MD Hayes also added the facility purchased new mattresses and protectors to replace the ones with bed bugs. LPA also reviewed receipts from Amazon (dated 12/5/2023) and Mattress Firm (dated 12/8/2023) noting the purchase of 14 mattresses and mattress protectors. ED McGuirk was interviewed and reported the facility purchased the same exact bed bug heater WEC uses, which allows the facility to immediately treat the affected areas while waiting for Western to become available to conduct an on-site inspection. Although the facility has experienced issues with bed bugs, they are taking appropriate steps to help mitigate the problem. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewe and provided to ED McGuirk.
2024-11-25Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged the facility illegally evicted a resident due to wandering and confusion. The facility said it assigned a dedicated caregiver for safety and explored alternative placements with the resident's assistance, and the investigation found no preponderance of evidence that an illegal eviction occurred. The resident moved out on April 17, 2023.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
to increased behaviors of wandering and confusion, the narrative charting revealed that the recommendation was not followed. LPA conducted interviews, per the interviews conducted with the Resident Services Director, Cherryrose Gajo, the facility implemented a 1:1 Caregiver for R1 and for their safety. Per a records review conducted, revealed that alternative placement was being looked into in or around March 2023 for R1. Per an additional records review (text message), conducted the facility suggested a resource to assist with relocating R1. R1 was unable to be interviewed as they moved out of the facility on 04/17/23. Based on interviews and records review the allegation of illegal eviction is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC811-Confidential names list was provided to Cherryrose Gajo, Resident Services Director, and Shaun McGuirk, Executive Director.
2024-11-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection conducted on November 6, 2024, and the facility passed without violations. The inspectors found the building clean and well-maintained, with proper safety equipment, secured medications and cleaning supplies, adequate staffing, sufficient food supplies, and all required emergency plans and training in place.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On November 06, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection and met with the Administrator, Shaun McGuirk. The facility file review was conducted at the Regional Office and additional records were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for (143) Elderly Adults and is currently operating at a capacity of (113) Elderly Adults (740). LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Administrator and made observations pertaining to the annual visit. LPA inspected the facility inside and outside there were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. Additionally, there were no bodies of water on the premises. The facility is a multi-level building located at 1351 E. Washington Ave Escondido, CA. 92027. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760) 741-3055 and it is operable. LPA Mixson observed a sampling of the residents’ living units, and each was equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. LPA Mixson inspected a sample of the facility restrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The restrooms sampled were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. LPA Mixson observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something,” the "Personal Rights," and the PUB 475. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the residents and staff files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care currently at the time of this visit. Medications : Were locked and inaccessible to residents in care, and there was a sufficient supply of medication for each resident. The overall facility is clean, the furniture is in good condition. The facility heating system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Administrator informed LPA there were safety lights for night throughout the facility. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharp items are locked. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Care & Supervision / Administration: Adequate staff are present for the supervision of resident in care. Floor plans, telephone numbers and personal rights were found posted in the facility. The listed administrator possesses a current administrator’s certificate with an expiration date of 12/23/2024. Records Reviewed and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed five staff files and reviewed the facility's staff schedule. The staff files reviewed have criminal clearance and updated First Aid Certification. Five resident files were reviewed and possessed required paperwork. Disaster preparedness: LPA Mixson reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan as well as disaster training binder. LPA observed the last fire drill met the department standards. Drills are conducted quarterly and one per shift. Infection Control: LPA Mixson observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and found all required infection control measures. There were deficiencies observed and/or cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations at this time. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed and given to Administrator, Shaun McGuirk.
2024-08-28Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedCitation on file
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident left the facility unsupervised on two separate occasions within one week; during the second elopement, the resident was found by law enforcement confused and lost in a different city. The investigation substantiated that inadequate supervision allowed these elopements to occur. The facility was cited for this deficiency.
Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(CONTINUED FROM LIC 809) An interview with an outside source also revealed that R1 eloped from the facility a second time, approximately one week after the first elopement, found by law enforcement, confused and lost in a different city. Based on interviews and records review, the allegation that a resident eloped from the facility due to lack of supervision was determined to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, a deficiency is cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Cherryrose, whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.
2023-12-12Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced routine inspection on December 12, 2023 found the facility clean, well-maintained, and operating safely, with proper bedding and furniture in resident rooms, functioning safety alarms and equipment, secure medication storage, and adequate food supplies and activities. The inspector reviewed sample resident and staff records, interviewed staff and residents, and verified that all staff had required criminal clearances. No violations were found during the inspection.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 12/12/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chinwe Nwogene arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Nwogene met with Executive Director, Shaun McGuirk who was informed of the purpose of visit. LPA toured the Assisted Living and Memory Care Unit with Shaun McGuirk. The following was observed, reviewed, and inspected: The physical plant, in general, was in good repair and clean. The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). The buildings and grounds were free from hazards. Outdoor and indoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. LPA inspected a sample of resident bedrooms in the Assisted Living & Memory Care Unit. Resident bedrooms have the required bedding and furniture; such as clean mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting. Room temperatures were comfortable for residents in care. LPA inspected a sample of resident bathrooms; the bathroom appliances were operating in safe and sanitary conditions. LPA measured the hot water temperature in the sampled bathrooms, in which all bathroom sinks measured within regulation. Sampled bathrooms were equipped with non-skid surfaces and grab bars. Each resident is given a pendant to notify staff of any emergencies. LPA toured the kitchen and dining area. The facility was stocked with a 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable food items that were labeled appropriately. The facility had a menu posted and available for review. Dishes, glasses, and utensils were in good condition and stored in a healthful manner. LPA inspected the common areas. LPA observed several carbon monoxide alarms throughout the facility. Carbon monoxide & smoke detector were tested and functioning properly. Continue on LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from LIC809. There was a locked and centralized storage area for medications, including refrigerated medications. Medications appeared to be dispensed and documented appropriately. The facility had a designated area for resident files and staff files. Emergency disaster plans, personal rights, and complaint procedures were posted in a prominent area. There was adequate seating in the common areas and several activity rooms. LPA observed several activity posters. The facility was also equipped with a complete first aid kit as well as the first aid manual. LPA inspected the outdoor area of the facility. There was shaded area with seating. Overall, the facility was clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. All staff present have a criminal record clearance in file and are confirmed as being associated with the facility. Three #3 staff and #3 residents' records were reviewed. Three #3 staff and #3 residents were interviewed. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy was provided to Shaun McGuirk.
2023-08-16Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding bed bugs at the facility. The facility has experienced bed bug issues and is taking steps to address them, but there was not enough evidence to determine whether the specific violation alleged had occurred. An exit interview was conducted with facility staff.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(CONTINUED FROM LIC9099) Although the facility has experienced bed bug issues, they are taking appropriate steps to help mitigate the problem. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
2023-07-21Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced case management visit was conducted to update findings from a previous inspection. The state changed the status of the earlier report from "unsubstantiated" to "unfounded," meaning the original complaint was not supported by evidence. The facility was provided with the amended report.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management visit in conjunction with complaint control #18-AS-20230703125256. LPA met with Executive Director Amy Banaga and explained the purpose of the visit. On 07/13/2023, a facility visit was conducted with Shawna Emery, Resident Care Coordinator and LIC9099 dated 07/13/2023 was issued. The purpose of today's visit is to amend the findings of UNSUBSTANTIATED to UNFOUNDED on the LIC9099 issued on 07/13/2023. The amended LIC9099 was provided during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was also provided.
2023-07-12Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a resident's room was unsanitary with a filthy toilet and feces on the floor. The investigation found the complaint was unfounded: the resident is cognitively capable and responsible for their own room cleanliness under their admission agreement, housekeeping is offered weekly (the resident's assigned day is Thursday) but the resident regularly refuses the service, and staff observations did not support the allegation of an unsanitary room.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(CONTINUED FROM LIC9099) the toilet to be full of feces, urine, and toilet paper and the back of the toilet seat was covered in either feces or vomit. Review of R1's Admission Agreement (AA) dated 9/22/2020 revealed R1 was to be provided weekly housekeeping of their assigned room and R1 agreed to keep their room in a clean an sanitary condition. The AA also indicated R1 agreed to be responsible for the care and maintenance of their pet. During an interview with R1, R1 stated they believed their assigned weekly housekeeping day was Friday. R1 reported their room is cleaned every week by Maintenance Director Roy Hayes. R1 also reported that there was nothing wrong with their room and did not smell any odor or see any dog feces on the floor. Review of R1's Resident Assessment dated 9/27/2022 revealed R1 was determined to be at care level 1, meaning they were to only receive assistance with medications however, R1 refused to sign the assessment and therefore does not currently receive medication assistance. The assessment also revealed R1 was independent with bathing, grooming, and toileting. The assessment does not indicate the facility is responsible for cleaning up after R1's dog. Review of R1's Physician's Report (PR) dated 4/18/2019 revealed R1 does not have dementia or MCI, is not confused, does not display inappropriate or aggressive behavior, is able to follow instructions and able to communicate their needs. The PR also revealed R1 maintains the capacity to provide self care and manage medications. Further review of R1's records revealed R1 was served with a 30 Day Termination and Notice to Quit on April 25, 2023 for failing to comply with the facility's pet policy regarding the care and maintenance of their pet. During R1's interview, R1 acknowledged receiving an eviction notice for failing to clean up after their pet but added that they did not think it was necessary because there was no issue with their room. Review of housekeeping checklists for R1's room dated Thursday, June 29, 2023 and Thursday, July 6, 2023 revealed R1 refused housekeeping services on those days. Additionally, after receiving complaints from other residents of odor emanating from R1's room, housekeeping was attempted on Tuesday, April 4, 2023, Wednesday, April 5, 2023, and Tuesday, April 25, 2023 and R1 refused each of these attempts. Four (4) of four (4) staff interviewed revealed R1's weekly housekeeping day is Thursday and R1 regularly declines the service or asks that it be completed at a later time however, when staff return at the requested time, R1 will decline. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Resident's room is unsanitary". We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list. *This is an amended report.
8 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in San Diego County.
Other memory care facilities in San Diego County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

