Arizona · Tucson

Mary & Pete's Assisted Living.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(520) 818-2305
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 17% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 10-bed Care Facility with one citation on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Oct 2025
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Mary & Pete's Assisted Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Mary & Pete's Assisted Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
76th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
73rd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D1
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
1
total deficiencies
2025-11-24
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Mary & Pete's Assisted Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-10-10
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-814.B · 1 finding
R9-10-814.BA.A.C. § RR9-10-814.B
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-814.B

Based on record review and interview, the manager accepted and retained a resident who was confined to a bed or chair without meeting the requirements of R9-10-814(B)(2). The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.       Findings include:        1. R9-10-814(B)(2) states, "A manager of an assisted living facility authorized to provide personal care services may accept or retain a resident who is confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance if: the resident's primary care provider... examines the resident... at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition; reviews the assisted living facility's scope of services; and signs and dates a determination stating that the resident's needs can be met by the assisted living facility..."       2. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a current service plan for directed care services, which indicated R2 was bedbound. Further review of R2’s medical record revealed evidence of documentation indicating R2 was examined by a medical provider per R9-10-814(B)(2), was unavailable for review.         3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R2 was non-ambulatory and was accepted into the facility in the same condition. E1 acknowledged R2’s medical record did not include the required determination per R9-10-814(B)(2).        4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.