Arizona · Phoenix

Bella's Care Home, LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 812-7470
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 45% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 10-bed Care Facility with 7 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jun 2026
Last citation
Sep 2023
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Bella's Care Home, LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Bella's Care Home, LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
37th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
28th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

7 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D7
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
7
total deficiencies
2026-06-19
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Bella's Care Home, LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2023-09-01
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 7 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure personnel provided appropriate first aid before the arrival of emergency medical services to a resident who had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to recover independently. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed an incident report dated August 7, 2023. The incident report indicated R2 had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to recover independently. The incident report indicated staff contacted emergency medical services and did not provide first aid by assisting R2 off the floor before emergency services arrived. 2. In an interview, E1 reported R2 "have dead weight and are heavy" and E1 and E2 struggled to assist R2 in recovery when they have fallen but are uninjured. E1 reported when staff are unable to assist uninjured residents who have fallen, the staff will contact emergency medical services for assistance.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation required by this Article was provided to the Department within two hours after a Department request. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance. Findings include: 1. On September 1, 2023, at 11:00 AM, the Compliance Officer requested to review documentation of completion of a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers for E2. However, the required documentation was not provided for review within two hours after a Department request. The documentation was provided at 2:02 PM, approximately three hours after the request. 2. In a joint interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the requested documentation was not provided to the Department within two hours of the request.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed E1 and E2 working on the premises. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed no documented staffing schedule. 3. In an interview, E1 reported E1 and E2 are the only staff for the facility and did not have a staffing schedule.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for one of three residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a service plan dated July 2023. The service plan indicated R3 required assistance with showers, nail care, shaving, teeth/denture care, and dressing. However, the service plan did not indicate the frequency at which the facility would provide assistance with the aforementioned services. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R3's service plan did not include a frequency for the aforementioned services.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was in compliance with a medication order, for two of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a medication order dated August 22, 2023 for "Calcium Antacid 500 mg (milligrams) CH, 1 Tab PO QD Every 3 days." 2. Further review of R1's medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated August 2023. The MAR indicated "Calcium Antacid" was administered daily on August 17-31, 2023. 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed a medication order dated August 23, 2023 for "Senna-S 8.6 mg - 50 mg Tablet, Take two tablets every day by oral route in the evening." 4. Further review of R2's medical record revealed a MAR dated August 2023. The MAR indicated "Senna-S" was only administered on August 24, 2023. 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the aforementioned medications administered to R1 and R2 were not administered in compliance with medication orders.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure potentially hazardous foods requiring refrigeration were maintained at 41 \'b0F or below. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a refrigerator in the kitchen containing food items. The refrigerator contained a thermometer and the thermometer measured the temperature at 50.0 \'b0F. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the kitchen refrigerator temperature was not maintained at 41 \'b0F or below.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a documented disaster plan. However, there was no documentation to indicate the disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was not reviewed at least once every 12 months.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.