Cogir at the Quarry.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 23 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-04-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-12-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in December 2025. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection visit.
Read full citation text (2)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to ensure that Washington state name and date of birth background checks were completed every two years for 2 of 2 sampled staff members (Staff E and F). Staff E's check was completed on 04/05/2024 with no evidence of prior checks since hiring on 08/07/2020. Staff F had checks on 06/04/2021 and 01/11/2024 but no other checks to meet the two-year requirement since hiring on 06/07/2021.”
“The facility failed to document specific resident-identified care and service needs in the negotiated service agreements for 8 of 15 sampled residents. Missing documentation included medical devices, diet types, nurse delegation services, wounds, and home health services that were documented in assessments and facility records but not reflected in the NSAs.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2466: The facility failed to ensure that Washington state name and date of birth background checks were completed every two years for 2 of 2 sampled staff members (Staff E and F). Staff E's check was completed on 04/05/2024 with no evidence of prior checks since hiring on 08/07/2020. Staff F had checks on 06/04/2021 and 01/11/2024 but no other checks to meet the two-year requirement since hiring on 06/07/2021. WAC 388-78A-2140: The facility failed to document specific resident-identified care and service needs in the negotiated service agreements for 8 of 15 sampled residents. Missing documentation included medical devices, diet types, nurse delegation services, wounds, and home health services that were documented in assessments and facility records but not reflected in the NSAs.
2024-06-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“Facility failed to provide resident records to surviving family within two working days as required. Records were not fully released until 15 days after the request.”
“Facility changed a resident's service plan without the resident's involvement or consent.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to provide resident records to surviving family within two working days as required. Records were not fully released until 15 days after the request. —: Facility changed a resident's service plan without the resident's involvement or consent.
2024-03-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2023-10-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in your submission to write an accurate summary. You've provided the inspection type (complaint), but the narrative section is incomplete — it only shows "WA DSHS report: Investigations (10/2023)" without describing what was actually investigated or what the findings were. To summarize the inspection for families, I would need details about what complaint was received, what was examined, and whether any violations or substantiated concerns were identified.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“A resident's bedroom window was missing its required sixteen mesh screen, resulting in a resident falling out of the window. The facility was uncertain who removed the screen and conducted a full audit to ensure all windows have required screens.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-3000: A resident's bedroom window was missing its required sixteen mesh screen, resulting in a resident falling out of the window. The facility was uncertain who removed the screen and conducted a full audit to ensure all windows have required screens.
Other facilities in Clark County.
Other memory care facilities in Clark County with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.