Lacamas Heights Memory Care.
Lacamas Heights Memory Care is Ranked in the top 43% of Washington memory care with 2 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Dec 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 21 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Lacamas Heights Memory Care has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-12-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in December 2025. The report does not provide specific findings, deficiencies, or enforcement actions in the narrative provided. To obtain details about this facility's inspection results, families should request the full inspection report from Washington DSHS.
“The facility failed to verify that 3 of 3 delegated Medication Technicians (Staff C, F, and G) had completed nurse delegation core training before being delegated tasks. The facility failed to obtain written consent from the resident or representative prior to implementing nurse delegation for 1 sampled resident. The facility failed to re-evaluate delegation for the resident every 90 days as required.”
“The facility failed to complete a character, competence, and suitability (CCS) determination when Staff F's background check came back with a 'review required' result, placing residents and staff at risk by possibly employing staff with disqualifying criminal convictions or pending charges.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2310(2)(f) and WAC 246-840-930: The facility failed to verify that 3 of 3 delegated Medication Technicians (Staff C, F, and G) had completed nurse delegation core training before being delegated tasks. The facility failed to obtain written consent from the resident or representative prior to implementing nurse delegation for 1 sampled resident. The facility failed to re-evaluate delegation for the resident every 90 days as required. WAC 388-78A-24701 and WAC 388-113-0060: The facility failed to complete a character, competence, and suitability (CCS) determination when Staff F's background check came back with a 'review required' result, placing residents and staff at risk by possibly employing staff with disqualifying criminal convictions or pending charges.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.