Washington · Camas

Lacamas Heights Memory Care.

ALF36 bedsDementia-trained staff(360) 210-5171
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 43% of Washington memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Camas
A 36-bed ALF with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
36
Last inspection
Dec 2025
Last citation
Dec 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Lacamas Heights Memory Care

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Lacamas Heights Memory Care
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 21 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.

ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.

Severity rank
30th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
40th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: DEC 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
DEC 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G2
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2025-12-01
Annual Compliance Visit
Type A · 2 findings

Plain-language summary

A routine inspection was conducted in December 2025. The report does not provide specific findings, deficiencies, or enforcement actions in the narrative provided. To obtain details about this facility's inspection results, families should request the full inspection report from Washington DSHS.

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Lacamas Heights Memory Care, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

Read full citation text (2)
Type AWAC §WAC 388-78A-2310(2)(f) and WAC 246-840-930
Verbatim citation text · WAC §WAC 388-78A-2310(2)(f) and WAC 246-840-930

The facility failed to verify that 3 of 3 delegated Medication Technicians (Staff C, F, and G) had completed nurse delegation core training before being delegated tasks. The facility failed to obtain written consent from the resident or representative prior to implementing nurse delegation for 1 sampled resident. The facility failed to re-evaluate delegation for the resident every 90 days as required.

Type AWAC §WAC 388-78A-24701 and WAC 388-113-0060
Verbatim citation text · WAC §WAC 388-78A-24701 and WAC 388-113-0060

The facility failed to complete a character, competence, and suitability (CCS) determination when Staff F's background check came back with a 'review required' result, placing residents and staff at risk by possibly employing staff with disqualifying criminal convictions or pending charges.

Read raw inspector notes

WAC 388-78A-2310(2)(f) and WAC 246-840-930: The facility failed to verify that 3 of 3 delegated Medication Technicians (Staff C, F, and G) had completed nurse delegation core training before being delegated tasks. The facility failed to obtain written consent from the resident or representative prior to implementing nurse delegation for 1 sampled resident. The facility failed to re-evaluate delegation for the resident every 90 days as required. WAC 388-78A-24701 and WAC 388-113-0060: The facility failed to complete a character, competence, and suitability (CCS) determination when Staff F's background check came back with a 'review required' result, placing residents and staff at risk by possibly employing staff with disqualifying criminal convictions or pending charges.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.