Brookdale Vancouver Stonebridge.
Brookdale Vancouver Stonebridge is Ranked in the top 17% of Washington memory care with 3 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Brookdale Vancouver Stonebridge has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Brookdale Vancouver Stonebridge's record and state requirements.
DSHS records show 6 deficiencies across 4 inspection reports through July 2025 — can you walk me through the corrective action plans the facility submitted for those deficiencies, and show documentation that each has been resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints were filed with DSHS during the inspection period on file — were either of those complaints substantiated, and what specific changes did the facility make in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that describes how staff are trained to support residents with memory loss, and confirm that training applies to all shifts?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-10-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“Facility investigated a resident-to-resident altercation but failed to report the incident to DSHS for 20 days, violating reporting requirements.”
“Facility investigated a resident-to-resident altercation but failed to notify the state of the incident for 13 days, violating timely reporting requirements.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility investigated a resident-to-resident altercation but failed to report the incident to DSHS for 20 days, violating reporting requirements. —: Facility investigated a resident-to-resident altercation but failed to notify the state of the incident for 13 days, violating timely reporting requirements.
2024-02-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Brookdale Vancouver Stonebridge found that a resident received hot chocolate that was not cooled to a safe temperature, spilled on the resident's lap, and caused a burn to the inner thigh that developed into a blister. The facility's policy required hot liquids to be cooled to between 135 and 140 degrees Fahrenheit before serving to residents, and staff were required to provide direct supervision during meals, but staff failed to cool the beverage and left the resident unattended. A deficiency was cited for failure to provide for the resident's safety and well-being.
“The facility failed to provide for the safety and well-being of a resident by not implementing preventative measures for hot beverage service. A resident was given hot chocolate at an unsafe temperature without proper monitoring, resulting in a burn to the resident's inner thigh when the beverage spilled.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2170: The facility failed to provide for the safety and well-being of a resident by not implementing preventative measures for hot beverage service. A resident was given hot chocolate at an unsafe temperature without proper monitoring, resulting in a burn to the resident's inner thigh when the beverage spilled.
2023-10-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Clark County.
Other memory care facilities in Clark County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.