Atria Park of Vintage Hills.
Atria Park of Vintage Hills is Ranked in the top 20% of California memory care with 1 CDSS citation on record; last inspected Apr 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Atria Park of Vintage Hills has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Atria Park of Vintage Hills's record and state requirements.
The facility has 1 serious citation on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Seven complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The October 25, 2025 inspection is the most recent visit on record — can you provide families with a copy of the deficiency notice from that inspection and explain what corrective actions were implemented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
7 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-23Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
LPA reviewed R1's medical assessment dated 04/06/2026, documenting R1 does not exhibit memory loss or disorientation, and has the capacity to manage, administer, and store their own medications. LPA also reviewed R1's admission agreement dated 04/06/2026 noting the resident is responsible for insuring and maintaining their own clothing, jewelry, and personal possessions. LPA reviewed a signed Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables (LIC 621) dated 04/06/2026 and the "Description" column states, "Nothing to declare at this time" and reflects a signature of R1's responsible person. BD Sutterman was interviewed and reported R1 physically moved into the facility on 04/10/2026 and has not received any visits from an outside agency since their admission. RSD Cortez was also interviewed and reported the facility does not safeguard any of the residents personal belongings or cash resources. RSD Cortez reported R1 has not receive any services from home health, hospice, or any outside agency since being admitted to the facility. BD and RSD reported no such alleged incident has occurred in the facility. LPA conducted an interview with R1 who reported the incident occurred in their private residence prior to being admitted into the facility. R1 reported facility staff had no involvement with the incident and the facility does not safeguard any of their personal belongings. LPA conducted an interview with R1's responsible person who corroborated the information provided by R1. R1's responsible person reported they do not have any concerns with the care and supervision R! has received in the facility. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Staff did not safeguard Resident 1's personal belongings". We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and Confidential Names list (LIC 811) was reviewed and provided to BD Sutterman.
2025-12-17Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff failed to check on a resident's safety after the resident missed meals for two days; the resident was found on the floor by family members who had to ask staff for help. Interviews revealed that the facility relied only on meal checks to monitor residents during the day, these checks were not being done properly, and staff made no effort to check on the resident despite knowing meals had been missed. The facility was cited for this violation.
“This deficiency is evidenced by the following:' R1 had not been seen for meals for three days and staff did not follow the policy of meal attendace and go check on resident resulting in R1 being found on the ground which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 06/17/2022, LPA Chinwe Nwogene toured the facility, interviewed staff 1-staff 4 (S1-S4), reviewed resident files, and collected pertinent documents. On 10/25/2025 LPA Gutierrez interviewed Executive Director by telephone, S5 by telephone, attempted phone interview with S6 and S7 in person, and residents 2- residents 10 (R2-R10). LPA obtained copies of the following documents: staff roster, resident roster, R1’s physicians reports, monthly responsibility personal care rate document, functional needs/service plan, identification information (LIC 601), and face sheet. During today’s visit LPA delivered findings. In regard to the allegation” Facility failed to check on the safety of resident”, It is alleged that after three days of calling R1 with no answer family went to facility and found R1 on floor and had to tell staff for help. During interview with Executive Director, staff three (3) out of seven (7) stated that R1 required no level of care and was independent. Executive director stated that meal checks are the only way to check on residents for the day and that the meal checks have not being done properly in the past. S3 stated that R1 was marked as refused on 06/09/2002 and 06/10/2022 because he/she did not see R1 at mealtime and assumed R1 did not want to eat. S4 stated they were responsible for verifying and signing off the meal attendance report but had not been doing that. During interviews with residents nine (9) out of ten (10) stated that staff comes and checks on them. R2 stated it may take them awhile, but they come eventually. Despite more than one staff knowing that R1 missed meals for 2 days there is no evidence that staff went to check on R1. Based on record review and conducted interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Crissy Pan
2025-10-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This routine inspection found that the facility failed to check on residents' safety regularly—a family member had to call three times without answer, then found a resident on the floor and had to alert staff for help. The facility relies only on meal checks to monitor residents during the day, but these checks have not been done properly, with staff sometimes marking residents as refusing meals without actually seeing them. A separate allegation that the resident was found covered in feces and urine could not be proven with the available evidence, though the failure to check on the resident was substantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
In regard to the allegation” Facility failed to check on the safety of resident”, It is alleged that after three days of calling R1 with no answer family went to facility and found R1 on floor and had to tell staff for help. During interview with Executive Director, staff three (3) out of seven (7) stated that R1 required no level of care and was independent. Executive director stated that meal checks are the only way to check on residents for the day and that the meal checks have not being done properly in the past. S3 stated that R1 was marked as refused on 06/09/2002 and 06/10/2022 because he/she did not see R1 at mealtime and assumed R1 did not want to eat. S4 stated they were responsible for verifying and signing off the meal attendance report but had not been doing that. During interviews with residents nine (9) out of ten (10) stated that staff comes and checks on them. R2 stated it may take them awhile but they come eventually. Based on record review and conducted interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Crissy Panganiban. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 In regard to the allegation “Resident was found on the floor in his room with feces and urine”, it is alleged that staff failed to check on R1 and was found by family covered in feces and urine on the floor. During interviews with Executive Director and staff three (3) out of seven (7) stated that they never observed feces or urine on R1. Three (3) staff did not see R1 at time of incident. During record review LPA did not obtain any document that could collaborate this allegation. During interviews with residents nine (9) out of ten (10) residents stated they have never been left in urine or feces, and staff helps them with their incontinence needs. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-05-15Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On May 15, 2025, inspectors conducted the annual required inspection and found the facility clean and well-maintained, with current resident assessments, properly stored medications, working emergency equipment, and adequate food supplies. A missing window screen in the laundry room was replaced during the visit, and no violations were issued. All staff files reviewed showed required clearances and certifications were in order.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 05/15/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a 1 year required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Mariano Hernandez, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed with an approved fire clearance to serve 81 non ambulatory and 62 bedridden. There is a delayed egress in Building A (Life Guidance/memory care). The facility has an approved hospice waiver for (21) with (19) residents currently receiving hospice services. The facility currently has zero (0) bedridden residents. During today's visit LPA verified facility contact information and will update accordingly. Below is a summary of observations made during today's inspection of Assisted living census: (73) and Memory Care, census (28). In Assisted living the building consists of an Ice cream parlor, Nurse's station, library, kitchen, multi purpose room, beauty salon, art and crafts room and laundry room. LPA observed for there to be a missing screen on the window inside the laundry room located on the second floor. There was no citation issued as it was put back on during LPAs visit. In memory care (building A), consists of three wings (Wisteria court, Magnolia court and Rose court). LPA observed for there to be a dining area, salon, laundry room, and a kitchen- serves beverages and warms the food that is prepared in the main kitchen. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior areas of the facility. The facility was observed to be clean, clutter and odor free. The food supply was observed to be sufficient as there was a two day supply of perishable and a seven day supply of nonperishable food items. The facility does have a pool located on the independent living side/building. It is open to all residents for use however, it is rarely used. The facility 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 elevators were recently inspected February 2025. The facility has operable smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. LPA observed for there to be (4) fire extinguishers on each floor, that were last inspected on 12/22/24. Emergency disaster drills are being conducted on a quarterly basis, last drill was conducted on 2/26/25. In assisted living the medications were observed to be locked inside a medication cart that is stored inside the medication room located on the second floor. The facility utilizes an electronic Medication Authorization Record System. The same applies for memory care, as LPA observed to be locked inside a cart inside the medication room. The pull cords were tested in random resident rooms and were found to be operable. The hot water was tested in assisted living measuring at 111-113 degrees Fahrenheit. In memory care the water was tested and ranged from 116-120 degrees Fahrenheit. A file review was conducted and resident files were reviewed and were observed to have current resident assessments, and admission agreements. LPA reviewed random staff files and observed for the staff to have obtained criminal record clearance and to be associated to the facility. The staff files reviewed were observed to possess valid CPR certification, and training that is completed online and in person. In addition the Executive Director Mariano was observed to possess a valid administrator's certification that expires on 12/09/25. During today's visit LPA gave a reminder of the amount for the facility annual fees, that are due on or before 06/30/25, and provided PIN 809985, should the licensee wish to pay electronically. Based on today's inspection no citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and the LIC811-confidential names list was reviewed and provided to Mariano "Quinn" Hernandez, Executive Director.
2025-03-13Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff failed to address a resident's change in condition. The investigation found no violation: resident notes showed no undocumented symptoms, medication records were appropriate for the resident's diagnoses, and the resident denied the allegation and reported receiving care when needed.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Resident notes, and there is nothing noted regarding the symptoms noted that are related to the alleged change of condition, there was some preexisting conditions. In addition LPA conducted a review of R1s prescriptions and Medication Authorization Record for February and March 2025 that revealed R1 was prescribed medications associated with other medically related diagnoses. LPA conducted an interview with R1 whom denied the allegation, as they stated they were great and they have not recently experienced what was reported. R1 stated that they receive care when they need it, and stated that they do not have a problem as they let their needs be known to the staff. Based on observation, interviews and records review the allegation of staff are not addressing a change in resident's condition is unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC811-Confidential names list was reviewed and provided to Mariano Hernandez, Executive Director.
2024-06-07Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection on June 7, 2024, and no violations were found. The inspector checked the facility's physical condition, safety equipment, medication storage, food supply, staffing, and resident files, and found everything in compliance with regulations.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On June 07, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection and met with the Administrator, Mariano Hernandez. The facility file review was conducted in the Regional Office and additional forms were reviewed and requested on site. The facility is licensed for 143 ambulatory residents and is currently serving about 120 residents. LPA Mixson toured the facility and inspected the facility inside and outside, and there were no obstructions to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. The facility is a three floored facility located at 41780 Butterfield Stage RD. Temecula, CA. 92592. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is(951) 506-5555. The LPA observed a sampling of the residents’ living units, and they were equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. LPA Mixson inspected a sampling of the facility restrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The restrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. The LPA observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something" the "Personal Rights" and the Ombudsman postings. There was a designated storage space for the residents and staff files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care currently at the time of this visit. There was a pool and jacuzzi present which was fenced in meeting the height requirements, and has a key pad. Medications : were locked and inaccessible to residents in care and located in the "Nurse's Station." The overall facility is clean, the furniture is in good condition. The facility cooling system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit, and there were safety lights throughout the building. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Kitchen utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharps are locked. Care & Supervision : Facility has sufficient staff on site at the time of this visit. Records Review: The LPA reviewed resident and staff files, conducted staff and resident interviews. Previous Community Care Licensing forms were reviewed. There were no Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Mariano Hernandez.
2023-06-26Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced annual inspection, inspectors found the facility met requirements across all areas reviewed, including infection control, physical plant safety, food service, staffing, medication storage, and emergency preparedness. The facility was clean and well-maintained, with proper equipment, adequate supplies, and necessary safety measures in place such as secured medication storage, locked dangerous items, and a fenced pool area. No violations were identified.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Cheryl Goodrich made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection focused on the annual inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director, Quinn Hernandez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of visit there was 97 staff and 142 residents present. Infection Control: The LPA observed the hand washing signs in and handwashing stations the facility restrooms. LPA observed gloves and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and found all required infection control measures. LPA observed than a 30-day supply of PPE found in the basement. Physical Plant: LPA observed the client bedrooms. Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair were present. The outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards. LPA observed pool and a jacuzzi which was fenced in which met the height requirements. LPA observed the facility outdoor furniture available for the residents use. Laundry room was observed to be locked and was observed to be in good working condition. The sharp and dangerous objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to clients. The Backup generator has been inspected and in good condition with the next inspection date of 10/11/23. Buildings and Grounds: The facility consists of memory care facility and adult living facility. Memory Care consists of one floor for memory care with waiver in place. Each bedroom in memory care has community showers. The Adult Living consists of 3 floors for residential living with single and double bedroom with private showers. Food Service: LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Care & Supervision / Administration: Adequate staff are present for the supervision of clients. Emergency exiting plans, telephone numbers and personal rights were found posted in the facility. The listed administrator possesses a current administrator's certificate. Storage and Supplies: Medications are be stored in the medication rooms on the second floor, inaccessible to any unauthorized individuals. Secured areas are available for administrative facility files and client files are in the business office and medical files are available in the medication staff office. The first aid kit was observed to be available and complete. Cleaning supplies will be stored away in a secured closet, adjacent to kitchen, staff carts and maintenance office. Linens, and equipment appeared to be in good repair and sufficient for approved census. A Fire extinguisher was available and fully charged. Forms : The following signs were observed to be posted at the facility: Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC 610E), Personal Rights, and Facility Sketch (LIC 999). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Executive Director, Quinn Hernandez
6 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Riverside County.
Other memory care facilities in Riverside County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
