California · Saratoga

Saratoga Retirement Community.

CCRC418 bedsDementia-trained staff
Facility · Saratoga
A 418-bed CCRC with no citations on file.
Licensed beds
418
Last inspection
Jul 2025
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Odd Fellows Home of Ca; Grand Lodge; Prs Mgmt Inc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 23 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

CCRC · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
100th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
100th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Be first to know if Saratoga Retirement Community's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

Peer median 2 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jul 2024as of Jun 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Saratoga Retirement Community's record and state requirements.

01 /

Four complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

The facility holds 418 licensed beds but is not designated as a memory-care facility by CDSS — does the RCFE offer dementia care, and if so, can you provide the written dementia-care program required by Title 22 §87705?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The July 9, 2025 inspection recorded zero deficiencies — can you provide families with a copy of that inspection report and confirm the facility's license status remains current?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

6
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2025-07-09
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

During a routine annual inspection, the facility was found to meet all requirements across all areas reviewed, including safe water temperatures in bathrooms, adequate food supplies, complete first aid and medication records, and up-to-date emergency systems and evacuation drills. The inspector toured resident apartments in both the assisted living and memory care sections and confirmed each had working lights and proper storage for clothing and bedding. No violations were found.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year Visit and met with Sangeetha Narasinhan, Health Services Director. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility inside and out. LPA Marrufo toured the kitchen area and observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. The first aid kit was reviewed and found to be complete. LPA toured 12 assisted living resident apartments and 4 memory care apartments. Each apartment had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. The water in the resident bathrooms were between 105 F to 117 F. LPA toured bathrooms in the facility hallway and their water temperatures were between 106 F to 116 F. LPA toured the outside area and found it to be clear of obstructions. Facility records indicate the emergency fire sprinkler system was tested on 06/24/2025 and the fire alarm system was tested on 12/03/2024. The Emergency Evacuation and Disaster Drill Log indicates the last drill was conducted on 06/19/2025. LPA reviewed 7 resident records, including Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records, and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed 7 staff records and found them to be complete. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Sangeetha Narasinhan, Health Services Director, and a copy of this report was provided.

2025-04-11
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On April 9, 2025, a resident died at the facility; the cause of death is unknown at this time. A licensing analyst visited on April 11, 2025, to investigate the death and reviewed medical records and facility documentation with the administrator. No violations were found during this visit, though the case remains under investigation.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident report, regarding a death report for a resident referred to as R1. LPA met with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) Sangeetha Narasimhan and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 11, 2025, the Department received an incident report stating on April 9, 2025, which stated resident R1 had passed away. The incident report stated R2 had left R1 in the bedroom, while R1 was taking a nap at 12:45pm. R2 returned and went straight to the couch and rested for 15 minutes. R2 then went to check on R1 and saw that R1 had passed away. The cause of death is unknown at this time. LPA requested R1's , R1's Identification and Emergency Information, house keeping schedule, admission record, physician's report, pre admission appraisal, medication list. LPA also requested a copy of R2's physicians report and pre admission appraisal. LPA requested a copy of resident R1's death certificate once it becomes available. LPAs determined this case management needs further investigation. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Nursing home Administrator Sangeetha Narasimhan and a copy of the report was provided.

2024-11-15
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Grace Donato

Plain-language summary

On October 28, 2024, a state inspector made an unannounced visit to deliver an amended report related to a previous complaint investigation. The inspector met with the clinical services supervisor to review and provide a copy of the amended report. No new violations or concerns were identified during this visit.

Read raw inspector notes

On 10/28/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an an unannounced case management visit to deliver a copy of amended report from 10/28/24. LPA met with Clinical Services Supervisor, Rubina Banwait and explained the purpose of the visit. An amended report was delivered in reference to complaint # 26-AS-20220110162643. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.

2024-10-28
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Grace Donato

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation into allegations that staff failed to respond appropriately to a resident's fall and hospital return, and that one staff member yelled at residents and was inattentive. The department interviewed eight staff members and three residents; staff and residents reported that care was appropriate and help was provided promptly, and investigators found no evidence to support the allegations.

Read raw inspector notes

Based on records review, on R1s progress notes, R1 just came back to the facility on 12/25/2021 after being sent to the hospital on 12/24/2021 for a fall. From 12/25/2021, there were several logs in the note about observation of resident. At 9:54am, R1 came back from hospital, alert and responsive. Encouraged to increase fluid intake. Alert charting initiated. At 4:58pm, R1 was observed to be in the sofa, alert and responsive, no respiratory distress noted, R1 stated no pain, no nausea or vomiting at this time. On 12/26/2021, at 6:34am, R1 was observed to be fine, shows confusions and stated that “something on his/her legs not normal” and denied pain. At 10:13am, a note was entered for feet treatment. At 11:46am, R1 is participating in activities, alert and responsive, no respiratory distress noted. R1 stated no pain, no nausea or vomiting at this time, mentioned having a slight headache. Care staff notified R1 is having difficulty walking. There is a weakness noted on the left leg. At 2:03pm, Care staff notified that they were trying to transfer R1 from wheelchair to bed. R1 is unable to stand and care staff. R1 was assessed, has hard time to move left leg due to weakness. There is some weakness on her left hand noted as well. 911 was called and R1 was sent to hospital. LPA was able to interview eight staff members. S1 stated that when R1 Complains of leg pain, they ask the doctor as to what medication can be given. S2 mentioned that there are no issues with care for R1, never complains but refuses care sometimes. 911 was called right away when incident happened. S3, S5 and S7 all mentioned that they call a nurse to assess when something happens. LPA is not able to confirm the date provided by the complainant since there is no form of contact provided. A co-complainant also called but the same information was provided. Regarding the allegation of staff speaks inappropriately to residents, the co-complainant (CC) stated that S1 does not help any of the residents, but instead spends time on his/her phone shopping online. The RP states that when residents call upon S1 for help, S1 yells at them. CC states that staff can hear S1 yelling at residents on the radio. The RP states that S1 does not care about the residents or their well being. page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 *** This is an amended report *** According to interviews of the 8 staff members, all mentioned of not being aware of any inappropriate treatment of residents by the staff. LPA was able to interview three residents and all mentioned that they are treated fine and are happy here in the facility. R2 mentioned that he/she is treated well by the staff, no one is inappropriate with him/her. R3 stated that they always come and help right away whenever he/she presses the pendant. R4 also mentioned that staff here are really nice and helps a lot when needed. Based on interviews, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. page 3 of 3

2024-07-27
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Simranjit Rai

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection of the facility's assisted living and memory care units. The inspector found the facility well-maintained, with adequate food supplies, proper temperatures in kitchen storage, clean bathrooms with functioning equipment, working fire safety systems, and staff and resident records in order. No violations were cited.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA met with Administrator (ADM) Sarah Stel and Health Care Administrator, Sangeetha Narasimhan stated the purpose of today's visit. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility to include the assisted living unit and memory care unit. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. LPA Rai observed the temperature of the freezer at 0 degrees F and the temperature of the fridge at 37 degrees F. LPA Rai randomly toured resident bedrooms and they had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. The facility bathrooms had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 110.9 degrees F - 116.6 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 09/14/2023. Facility is equipped with interconnected smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors. The last disaster drill was conducted on 06/14/2024 and 04/17/2024. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 10 staff and 10 residents. LPA Rai reviewed at random resident current medications and central stored medication records. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator (ADM) Sarah Stel and Health Care Administrator, Sangeetha Narasimhan a copy of the report was provided.

2024-05-02
Complaint Investigation
No findings
Inspector · Jennifer Walden

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility's policies for resident meetings with the provider board and resident communications were in compliance with state law. The investigator determined that allegations the facility was limiting residents' ability to communicate with the board or requiring them to go through the executive director were not supported by evidence.

Read raw inspector notes

Cont. HSC section 1771(d)(1) requires that “at least part of the meeting shall be conducted without the presence of continuing care retirement community personnel”, based on the times provided, part of the meeting was conducted without CCRC personnel. The statutes do not prohibit CCRC personnel being present and in this case the staff member was not asked to leave the meeting; therefore, this allegation is unfounded. Based upon the review and investigation into the third allegation (CCRC is Limiting and/or restricting the ability of residents to communicate with the Provider Board and informing them they must go through the Executive Director to communicate). AGPA reviewed Saratoga Retirement Communities Communications Policy and Residents’ Handbook, dated January 2023. Both address the communication policy and steps residents can take to address questions and issues. AGPA found that the policies are in compliance with HSC section 1771.7(c)(4). In addition, there is no evidence that the community, nor providers, failed to follow the channels of communication listed in the Communications Policy or Residents’ Handbook; therefore, this allegation is unfounded. The Department has investigated the above allegations, and has determined that the allegations are Unfounded, meaning that the allegations were not supported or proven by evidence. Findings were delivered via telephone with Sarah Stel, Executive Director. Signed copy emailed and saved in file.

4 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.

4 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.

Nearby

Other facilities in Santa Clara County.

Other memory care facilities in Santa Clara County with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.