StarlynnCare

California · Saratoga

Saratoga Retirement Community

CCRC

A Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) offers multiple levels of care on a single campus — typically independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing. Residents often enter under a long-term contract and can transition between care levels as their needs change. CCRCs in California are regulated by the California Department of Social Services.

14500 Fruitvale Avenue · Saratoga, 95070

Quick facts

Licensed beds418
Memory careNot listed
Last inspectionJul 2025
Last citationNone on record
Operated byOdd Fellows Home of Ca; Grand Lodge; Prs Mgmt Inc
Map showing location of Saratoga Retirement Community

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 19 California CCRC facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
100th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
100th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Saratoga Retirement Community scores A. Better than 100% of comparable California RCFE-CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY facilities. Severity: top 0%. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: top 0%.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / ccrc / xl beds (19 facilities).

Citation severity over time

stable

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

0

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.

What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411

All direct-care staff must complete:

  • 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
  • 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
  • Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.

Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 418 licensed beds:

3 awake caregivers on duty overnight, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.

State law adds one awake caregiver for each 100 residents above 200.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
435201057
License type
RCFE-CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
418
Operator
Odd Fellows Home of Ca; Grand Lodge; Prs Mgmt Inc

Inspections & citations

10

reports on file

0

total deficiencies

Other visitJuly 9, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

During a routine annual inspection, the facility was found to meet all requirements across all areas reviewed, including safe water temperatures in bathrooms, adequate food supplies, complete first aid and medication records, and up-to-date emergency systems and evacuation drills. The inspector toured resident apartments in both the assisted living and memory care sections and confirmed each had working lights and proper storage for clothing and bedding. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year Visit and met with Sangeetha Narasinhan, Health Services Director. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility inside and out. LPA Marrufo toured the kitchen area and observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. The first aid kit was reviewed and found to be complete. LPA toured 12 assisted living resident apartments and 4 memory care apartments. Each apartment had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. The water in the resident bathrooms were between 105 F to 117 F. LPA toured bathrooms in the facility hallway and their water temperatures were between 106 F to 116 F. LPA toured the outside area and found it to be clear of obstructions. Facility records indicate the emergency fire sprinkler system was tested on 06/24/2025 and the fire alarm system was tested on 12/03/2024. The Emergency Evacuation and Disaster Drill Log indicates the last drill was conducted on 06/19/2025. LPA reviewed 7 resident records, including Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records, and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed 7 staff records and found them to be complete. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Sangeetha Narasinhan, Health Services Director, and a copy of this report was provided.

Other visitApril 11, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On April 9, 2025, a resident died at the facility; the cause of death is unknown at this time. A licensing analyst visited on April 11, 2025, to investigate the death and reviewed medical records and facility documentation with the administrator. No violations were found during this visit, though the case remains under investigation.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident report, regarding a death report for a resident referred to as R1. LPA met with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) Sangeetha Narasimhan and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 11, 2025, the Department received an incident report stating on April 9, 2025, which stated resident R1 had passed away. The incident report stated R2 had left R1 in the bedroom, while R1 was taking a nap at 12:45pm. R2 returned and went straight to the couch and rested for 15 minutes. R2 then went to check on R1 and saw that R1 had passed away. The cause of death is unknown at this time. LPA requested R1's , R1's Identification and Emergency Information, house keeping schedule, admission record, physician's report, pre admission appraisal, medication list. LPA also requested a copy of R2's physicians report and pre admission appraisal. LPA requested a copy of resident R1's death certificate once it becomes available. LPAs determined this case management needs further investigation. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Nursing home Administrator Sangeetha Narasimhan and a copy of the report was provided.

InspectionNovember 15, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Grace Donato

Plain-language summary

On October 28, 2024, a state inspector made an unannounced visit to deliver an amended report related to a previous complaint investigation. The inspector met with the clinical services supervisor to review and provide a copy of the amended report. No new violations or concerns were identified during this visit.

View full inspector notes

On 10/28/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an an unannounced case management visit to deliver a copy of amended report from 10/28/24. LPA met with Clinical Services Supervisor, Rubina Banwait and explained the purpose of the visit. An amended report was delivered in reference to complaint # 26-AS-20220110162643. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.

ComplaintOctober 28, 2024· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Grace Donato

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation into allegations that staff failed to respond appropriately to a resident's fall and hospital return, and that one staff member yelled at residents and was inattentive. The department interviewed eight staff members and three residents; staff and residents reported that care was appropriate and help was provided promptly, and investigators found no evidence to support the allegations.

View full inspector notes

Based on records review, on R1s progress notes, R1 just came back to the facility on 12/25/2021 after being sent to the hospital on 12/24/2021 for a fall. From 12/25/2021, there were several logs in the note about observation of resident. At 9:54am, R1 came back from hospital, alert and responsive. Encouraged to increase fluid intake. Alert charting initiated. At 4:58pm, R1 was observed to be in the sofa, alert and responsive, no respiratory distress noted, R1 stated no pain, no nausea or vomiting at this time. On 12/26/2021, at 6:34am, R1 was observed to be fine, shows confusions and stated that “something on his/her legs not normal” and denied pain. At 10:13am, a note was entered for feet treatment. At 11:46am, R1 is participating in activities, alert and responsive, no respiratory distress noted. R1 stated no pain, no nausea or vomiting at this time, mentioned having a slight headache. Care staff notified R1 is having difficulty walking. There is a weakness noted on the left leg. At 2:03pm, Care staff notified that they were trying to transfer R1 from wheelchair to bed. R1 is unable to stand and care staff. R1 was assessed, has hard time to move left leg due to weakness. There is some weakness on her left hand noted as well. 911 was called and R1 was sent to hospital. LPA was able to interview eight staff members. S1 stated that when R1 Complains of leg pain, they ask the doctor as to what medication can be given. S2 mentioned that there are no issues with care for R1, never complains but refuses care sometimes. 911 was called right away when incident happened. S3, S5 and S7 all mentioned that they call a nurse to assess when something happens. LPA is not able to confirm the date provided by the complainant since there is no form of contact provided. A co-complainant also called but the same information was provided. Regarding the allegation of staff speaks inappropriately to residents, the co-complainant (CC) stated that S1 does not help any of the residents, but instead spends time on his/her phone shopping online. The RP states that when residents call upon S1 for help, S1 yells at them. CC states that staff can hear S1 yelling at residents on the radio. The RP states that S1 does not care about the residents or their well being. page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 *** This is an amended report *** According to interviews of the 8 staff members, all mentioned of not being aware of any inappropriate treatment of residents by the staff. LPA was able to interview three residents and all mentioned that they are treated fine and are happy here in the facility. R2 mentioned that he/she is treated well by the staff, no one is inappropriate with him/her. R3 stated that they always come and help right away whenever he/she presses the pendant. R4 also mentioned that staff here are really nice and helps a lot when needed. Based on interviews, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. page 3 of 3

Other visitJuly 27, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Simranjit Rai

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection of the facility's assisted living and memory care units. The inspector found the facility well-maintained, with adequate food supplies, proper temperatures in kitchen storage, clean bathrooms with functioning equipment, working fire safety systems, and staff and resident records in order. No violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA met with Administrator (ADM) Sarah Stel and Health Care Administrator, Sangeetha Narasimhan stated the purpose of today's visit. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility to include the assisted living unit and memory care unit. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. LPA Rai observed the temperature of the freezer at 0 degrees F and the temperature of the fridge at 37 degrees F. LPA Rai randomly toured resident bedrooms and they had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. The facility bathrooms had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 110.9 degrees F - 116.6 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 09/14/2023. Facility is equipped with interconnected smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors. The last disaster drill was conducted on 06/14/2024 and 04/17/2024. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 10 staff and 10 residents. LPA Rai reviewed at random resident current medications and central stored medication records. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator (ADM) Sarah Stel and Health Care Administrator, Sangeetha Narasimhan a copy of the report was provided.

ComplaintMay 2, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jennifer Walden

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility's policies for resident meetings with the provider board and resident communications were in compliance with state law. The investigator determined that allegations the facility was limiting residents' ability to communicate with the board or requiring them to go through the executive director were not supported by evidence.

View full inspector notes

Cont. HSC section 1771(d)(1) requires that “at least part of the meeting shall be conducted without the presence of continuing care retirement community personnel”, based on the times provided, part of the meeting was conducted without CCRC personnel. The statutes do not prohibit CCRC personnel being present and in this case the staff member was not asked to leave the meeting; therefore, this allegation is unfounded. Based upon the review and investigation into the third allegation (CCRC is Limiting and/or restricting the ability of residents to communicate with the Provider Board and informing them they must go through the Executive Director to communicate). AGPA reviewed Saratoga Retirement Communities Communications Policy and Residents’ Handbook, dated January 2023. Both address the communication policy and steps residents can take to address questions and issues. AGPA found that the policies are in compliance with HSC section 1771.7(c)(4). In addition, there is no evidence that the community, nor providers, failed to follow the channels of communication listed in the Communications Policy or Residents’ Handbook; therefore, this allegation is unfounded. The Department has investigated the above allegations, and has determined that the allegations are Unfounded, meaning that the allegations were not supported or proven by evidence. Findings were delivered via telephone with Sarah Stel, Executive Director. Signed copy emailed and saved in file.

InspectionApril 21, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Christine Dolores

Plain-language summary

An inspector conducted a follow-up visit on April 19, 2023, after a resident in the independent living section passed away from possible carbon monoxide poisoning; the resident was found by a family member who called 911. The inspector reviewed records, interviewed staff, and observed the cottage where the death occurred. The investigation is pending.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - incident visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Sarah Stel. The purpose of the visit was to follow-up on an incident and death report received for resident (R1) who resided in the independent living section. On 04/19/2023, R1 passed away by possible carbon monoxide poisoning. R1 was found by a family member who called 911. Upon arrival of the paramedics, R1 was pronounced deceased. During visit, LPA was accompanied by ED and another staff to observe the exterior part of the cottage where R1 passed away. LPA interviewed 2 staff members (S1 - S2). LPA obtained documents to include the resident roster, staff roster, R1's face sheet (admission record), reported incident, and physician's report. Based on record review, R1 was diagnosed with a chronic degenerative disease. This case management - incident visit will be pending investigation. This report was reviewed with Executive Director (ED) Sarah Stel and a copy of the report was provided.

ComplaintSeptember 6, 2022· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: David Marrufo

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint was investigated that a resident's air conditioning system was not maintaining consistent room temperatures. The facility had already replaced the air conditioning unit, and while the resident reported temperature variations of 4-5 degrees, inspectors found that other residents' units worked properly, that the thermostat was within manufacturer specifications (within 2 degrees), and that factors like an open door and raised blinds in the resident's unit may have affected temperature readings. The complaint was not substantiated and no violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

LPA Marrufo also obtained copies of the following documents: handwritten notes on R1’s living unit temperature readings taken every 15 minutes, graph of R1’s room temperature reading, Staff Thermostat Check Log taken 08/15/2022, Resident Roster, Invoice for Air Conditioning Unit Replacement dated 02/24/2022, Invoice for Air Conditioning Service dated 06/25/2021, Data Log for temperature in R1’s living unit, photograph of the living room thermostat in R1’s living unit, R1’s Physician Report, and R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. During interview, R1 stated that temperature of the room would not match the temperature set by the thermostat. R1 stated that the temperature would be as much as 4 or 5 degrees warmer or colder at times compared to the temperature set by the thermostat. R1 stated to measure the temperature using both the temperature reading on the thermostat and another thermometer in R1’s possession. During visit, LPA Marrufo observed R1’s thermostat to be set at 73 degrees Fahrenheit with a measurement of the room at 75 Fahrenheit. LPA Marrufo took multiple temperature readings in various locations within R1’s living room, and the temperatures ranged from 90.1 Fahrenheit to 64.4 Fahrenheit. Administrator Sarah Stel stated during interviews that R1 had previously complained to facility staff regarding the air conditioning unit. Administrator Stel stated that the facility has replaced the air conditioning unit in R1’s living unit to meet R1’s requests. S1 stated during interview that the air conditioning unit had previously been replaced to address R1’s problems with the noise of the prior unit. S1 stated that the noise levels had been measured at 40 decibels and was measured with a decibel meter. S1 stated that after the new air conditioner unit was installed, there were still variations of the temperature. S1 also stated that a device was placed in the room to measure and record the room temperatures. S1 stated that the recordings during sleeping hours would show no variation in the temperature, and S1 stated that that implied that R1 was adjusting the temperature throughout the day. Witness W1 stated during interview that the thermostat in R1’s living unit gives a temperature reading within 2 degrees of the set temperature. W1 stated that a 2-degree range is within the manufacture’s specifications. W1 stated that the air conditioning unit is designed to be kept at a constant temperature and is not meant to be regularly adjusted. See LIC909-C for more information. Page 2 of 3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During telephone interviews, 4 out of 4 interviewed residents stated that their air conditioner worked properly. During tour of resident rooms and interviews with residents, LPA Marrufo observed that residents R6-R14 had thermostats had a temperature reading the same as the temperature to which the thermostat was set. R6-R14 stated to have had no problems with their thermostats or air conditioning units. Resident R1 stated to have had problems with the room temperature varying 4-5 degrees hotter or cooler than the temperature set by the thermostat. During visit on 09/06/2022, LPA Marrufo observed R1’s apartment. LPA Marrufo observed that R1’s thermostat at 3:06 PM was set to 71 Fahrenheit and the temperature was 74 Fahrenheit. LPA Marrufo observed that R1’s living unit front door was open, so R1 shut the door. During interview, R1 stated to have two thermostats, one in the living room and one in the bedroom. R1 stated to not use the thermostat in the bedroom and leaves it off. LPA Marrufo observed that the bedroom thermostat Air Conditioning fan was set to Off, the temperature was set to 73 Fahrenheit, and the thermostat measured the temperature at 77 Fahrenheit. LPA Marrufo observed that both bedroom window blinds were lifted up and sunlight was entering the bedroom. LPA Marrufo then requested R1 to turn on the bedroom thermostat Air Conditioner fan to full power and set the temperature to 71 Fahrenheit. LPA Marrufo requested R1 to lower the blinds on the bedroom windows. Both the living room and bedroom temperatures then had the same settings. At 3:47 PM, LPA Marrufo observed the living room thermostat to measure the room temperature at 73 Fahrenheit and the temperature set to 71 Fahrenheit. The bedroom thermometer was set to 72 Fahrenheit and set to 71 Fahrenheit. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegation listed above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 This report was reviewed with Sandy Narasimhan and a copy of the report was provided. Page 3 of 3.

InspectionJuly 28, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Ryker Heberle

Plain-language summary

An unannounced annual inspection on July 28, 2022 found the facility to be clean and well-maintained, with all emergency exits clear, adequate food and supplies on hand, working safety equipment, and proper infection control measures in place including staff vaccination. Staff were observed wearing masks, hand sanitizer and soap were available throughout, and cleaning supplies were properly stored. No deficiencies were cited.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst Ryker Heberle (LPA) conducted an unannounced annual inspection on 07/28/2022 at 01:12pm. LPA met with facility Administrator Sarah Stel (Admin). LPA toured the facility, including activity room, kitchen, dining room, library, 10 bedrooms, 12 bathrooms, and 2 offices. All staff members observed to be wearing masks. Admin confirmed that all staff and residents have been vaccinated. Facility infectious control plan has already been submitted. No prohibited items noted in resident rooms. All emergency exits noted to be clear of obstruction. All rooms in facility noted to be clean and well maintained. Hand sanitizers, soap, and paper supplies were observed to be available. At least 2 days' supply of perishable food and at least 1 week's supply of non-perishable food was observed on the premises. Fire extinguisher observed to be last inspected in September of 2021. All cleaning supplies and chemicals noted to be in locked cabinets and closets. Smoke/carbon monoxide detectors observed. Facility temperature noted to be 73*F. Facility observed to have designated entry point. Staff took LPAs' temperature and screened for symptoms. 30 days supply of PPE was observed. Hand washing signs were observed in all facility bathrooms. Paper towels were observed in all facility bathrooms. Water temperature observed to be 109.7 *F in facility bathroom. Social distancing signs observed to be posted in all public areas. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Sarah Stel and a copy of the signed report was provided.

ComplaintJune 17, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Anna Bui

Plain-language summary

A state inspector conducted a routine annual inspection on June 17, 2021, and found no violations. The facility had proper COVID-19 safety measures in place, including temperature screening at the entrance, hand sanitizer and soap, masks, social distancing signage, and adequate personal protective equipment supplies.

View full inspector notes

On 06/17/2021 at 11:07 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bui conducted an unannounced Annual Required 1 Year visit. LPA met with Executive Director Sarah Stel, Clinical Services Supervisor Rubina Banwait, and Assisted Living Director Bettylou Hidalgo. LPA toured the facility beginning with the main entrance. The entrance had a thermometer, hand sanitizer, and sign-in log to document temperature and screening questions. Universal precautions, COVID-19 protocols, and social distancing guidelines were posted throughout the facility. Restrooms had hand soap and paper towels readily available. Hand washing sign was posted at all hand washing stations. Common areas had signs posted on the seats to promote social distancing. Staff and residents were observed wearing a mask and following COVID-19 protocols. Facility observed to have adequate supply of PPE. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Executive Director Sarah Stel and a copy was provided to Executive Director Sarah Stel.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Saratoga