California · Cupertino

Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the.

CCRC817 bedsDementia-trained staff
Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the
Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the — photo 2
Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the — photo 3
Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the — photo 4
© Google · The Forum at Rancho San Antonio, Gretchen Sand, Katherine Holtz
Facility · Cupertino
A 817-bed CCRC with one citation on file.
Licensed beds
817
Last inspection
Dec 2025
Last citation
Jul 2024
Operated by
Rsarhc, Rsars Inc. & Life Care Services Llc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 23 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

CCRC · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
59th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
64th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 2 · dashed
Last citation: JUL 2024. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
JUL 2024
Jul 2024as of Jun 2026

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D1
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Forum at Rancho San Antonio, the's record and state requirements.

01 /

Two complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

The December 23, 2025 inspection cited one deficiency — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The facility holds 817 licensed beds but is not designated as a memory-care community in state records — does the facility currently serve residents with dementia diagnoses, and if so, what documentation can you provide showing compliance with Title 22 dementia-care requirements?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

4
reports on file
1
total deficiencies
2026-03-05
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

A resident died on March 3, 2026, after facility staff found them unresponsive in their room following a call from family. The state conducted an unannounced visit to review the incident and gathered medical and administrative records; no violations were cited during this review. The investigation remains ongoing and the state may conduct a follow-up visit.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident report, regarding a death report for a resident referred to as R1. LPA met with Administrator Rosalie B Zbasnik-Hulog and explained the purpose of the visit. On March 4, 2026, the Department received an incident report stating on March 3, 2026, stating resident R1 had passed away. The incident report stated on March 3, 2026 at 6:10pm, Wellness staff received a phone call from R1's family member, stating he/she has been calling R1, but no answer. Wellness staff went to the room and found R1 unresponsive. LPA requested R1's Identification and Emergency Information, house keeping schedule, physician's report, pre admission appraisal, medication list. LPA requested a copy of resident R1's death certificate once it becomes available. At this time, this case in under review and Department will conduct a follow visit , if warranted. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Rosalie B Zbasnik-Hulog and a copy of the report was provided.

2025-12-23
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Chihhsien Chang

Plain-language summary

On September 22, 2025, a resident was found on the floor in their bedroom and staff called 911 without moving them, assessed the resident's condition, and documented vital signs before paramedics arrived. An inspection found the facility followed its policy of not moving residents found on the floor until emergency responders evaluate them, and staff training confirmed this procedure was in place. No violation was found.

Read raw inspector notes

Resident is not being assessed for injuries after fall: Facility staff left resident on the floor after calling 911: On 10/01/2025, LPA interviewed Director of Health Service (DHS) Rosalie Hulog and Memory Care Manager. Both stated the facility policy is that caregivers are not allowed to move residents when they find residents were on the floor. The caregivers need to call nurses first (if nurse is busy, caregivers need to call Med Tech to come). Both stated the nurses check/evaluate resident on the floor and call 911 immediately. Both stated nurses check resident visually only. Both stated nurses cannot move the residents on the floor until paramedics come on site to evaluate the residents. Both stated nurses check if resident on the floor painful, bleeding, and check the vital signs. Both stated the nurses need to prepare the resident's document and to answer the questions from paramedics to help residents to be sent to hospitals. Both stated the policy was instructed to staff during the staff training. ON 10/01/2025, LPA interviewed the facility staff LVN (S1). S1 stated on 9/22/2025, he/she was notified by a caregiver that memory care unit resident R1 was found on the floor in R1's bedroom. S1 stated he/she went on site of R1's bedroom. S1 stated he/she called 911, evaluated R1 and prepared R1's document to be sent to hospital. S1 stated the facility's policy is not to move residents who are found on the floor. S1 stated another caregiver S2 was with him/her on site to take care and monitor R1. LPA interviewed caregiver S2. S2 stated he/she was notified on the floor in R1's room by another caregiver. S2 stated when he/she was on site at R1's room, S1 already there. S2 stated he/she observed S1 assessed R1 and prepared R1's document for the emergency room. S2 stated R1 stated he/she was fine but legs were numbed. S2 stated the facility policy is not to move residents who are found on the floor. Based on the review of the incident report dated 9/2325, R1's vital signs were 120/57 for blood pressure, 98.2 for temperature, 80 for pulse, 18 for respiratory rate, and 98% for oxygen. Based on the review of the facility policy of fall, it specifies do not move or lift an individual off the ground until it's verbalized that there's no pain and able to get up with minimum support and able to bear weight and ambulate. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 2 of 3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on the interview and record reviewed, the Department found that the above allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No citation noted today. Exit interview was conducted with DHS. The report was provided to DHS for signature. A copy of the report was provided to DHS. Page 3 of 3.

2025-07-25
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

This was a required annual unannounced inspection conducted in April 2026. The facility passed inspection with no violations found—exits were clear, food supplies were adequate, medications and hazardous materials were properly secured, resident rooms had necessary furnishings and functioning utilities, bathrooms were stocked with supplies, and fire safety equipment was in working order with current inspections and drills on file.

Read raw inspector notes

L icensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Assistant Executive Director, Mark Nelson and Administrator, Rosalie Zbasnik/Hulog and stated the purpose of today's visit. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. LPA Rai toured the facility to include at random 10 resident rooms. 10 Out of 10 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights.  The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The hot water temperature in the bathroom sink ranged from 109.9 - 118.1 degrees F. Facility smoke detectors and sprinklers were in working condition and inspected by a third party vendor on 4/23/2024 and 5/8/2025. The last disaster drills were conducted on 7/4/2025 and 7/22/2025. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 10 staff and 10 residents. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Page 2 of 2. During visit, LPA Rai discussed a 90-day Eviction Notice for resident (R1). Administrator, Rosalie stated the family has been issued the letter on 07/16/2025 and the family is working with the facility's social worker as R1 requires higher level of care. LPA Rai reviewed the 90-day Eviction Notice and the letter is compliant with CCR 87224 Eviction Procedures. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Assistant Executive Director, Mark Nelson and Administrator, Rosalie Zbasnik/Hulog and a copy of the report was provided. LIC 858 and LIC 859 were provided.

2024-07-23
Annual Compliance Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Simranjit Rai

Plain-language summary

This was a required annual inspection of the facility's assisted living and memory care units. Inspectors found that the building's safety systems, food storage, bedrooms, and bathrooms met standards, but cited deficiencies because six out of eleven resident care plans and one individual service plan were not properly signed by residents or their representatives, and a technical violation was noted in medication records.

Type B22 CCR §87463(b)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87463(b)

Based on record review and interview, 6 out of 11 resident files did not contain Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan and Individual Service Plan signed by resident and/or responsible party which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA met with Administrator (ADM) Rosalie Zbasnik/Hulog and stated the purpose of today's visit. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility to include the assisted living unit and memory care unit. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. LPA Rai observed the temperature of the freezer at 0 degrees F and the temperature of the fridge at 37 degrees F. LPA Rai observed storage unit for emergency food supply and two back-up generators on the premise. LPA Rai randomly toured 10 resident bedrooms. 10 Out of 10 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. The facility bathrooms had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 108.7 degrees F - 119.7 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 10/17/2023. Facility smoke detectors and sprinklers were in working condition and inspected by a third party vendor on 5/1/2024 and 7/19/2024. The last disaster drill was conducted on 03/18/2024 and 6/21/2024. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 10 staff and 11 residents. LPA Rai observed 6 out of 11 Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan was not signed by resident and/or responsible party. LPA Rai observed the facility Individual Service Plan was not signed by resident and/or responsible party. LPA Rai reviewed at random 10 resident current and PRN medications and central stored medication records. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Technical Violation was provided. This report was reviewed with Administrator (ADM) Rosalie Zbasnik/Hulog and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights were provided.

3 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.

3 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.