Cedar Creek Alzheimer's & Dementia Care Center.
Cedar Creek Alzheimer's & Dementia Care Center is Ranked in the top 1% of California memory care with no CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 26 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Be first to know if Cedar Creek Alzheimer's & Dementia Care Center's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Cedar Creek Alzheimer's & Dementia Care Center's record and state requirements.
One complaint is on file with CDSS — was it substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility has 58 licensed beds and is designated for memory care — can you provide the written dementia-care program required by Title 22 §87705?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection on September 16, 2025 reported zero deficiencies — can you show families the deficiency notice or inspection report from that visit?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-08Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff do not serve residents food of good quality: The allegation is that the facility meal food was not served hot, milk was not hot to serve to residents, and milk was not filled full in the cup/glass to residents. On 01/15/2026, LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM) Michelle White. ADM stated every resident receives plenty of food for the meals. ADM stated the kitchen staff prepare food/meals for resident based on their order/preference. ADM stated meals are placed on the plates, and caregivers deliver to dining table in the dining room for residents. ADM stated some residents have special diets, and the kitchen staff prepare the special diet the for the residents. ADM stated caregivers do not push or hurry residents to finish the meals, and some residents take up to one hour or one and half hours to finish meals. ADM stated the facility has the food temperature log for the meal food when meals are ready to deliver to residents to make sure meals are warm/hot to deliver to residents. ADM provided the meal temperature log. ADM stated milk is served around 40 degree F as around the same as in the refrigerator temperature. ADM stated that is the usual way people drink milk. ADM stated residents can request to heat the milk if they prefer hot milk. ADM stated usually the milk or beverage is not served full of the cup/glass because residents may spill out if not carefully. ADM stated resident can request more milk or beverage if needed. LPA interviewed two kitchen staff (S1, S2). Both stated resident meals are prepared based on residents' order/preference and are placed on plates, and caregivers deliver meals to residents. Both stated residents' meals are put in oven before delivered to residents. Both stated the kitchen staff keep meal temperature log. LPA interviewed 2 caregivers (S3, S4). Both stated milk is not served as hot milk and residents can request to heat the milk. Both stated milk is not served as full glass/cup because resident may spill out. Both stated they deliver meals from kitchen to residents. Based on the review of the meal temperature log, the meals were kept warm/hot and milk and beverage were kept around 40 degree F before delivered to residents. Based on the review of the facility food menu, protein, Carbohydrates , and vegetables are provided everyday to residents. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 2 of 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care: The allegation is that family member (FM) was not aware of resident R1 uses wheelchair due to facility staff did not notify FM.. On 01/15/2026, LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM). ADM stated resident R1 already used walker and wheelchair when the new management team took over the facility. ADM stated R1 prefers to sit because R1 has pain knees. ADM stated the facility encourages R1 to walk with walker for exercise. ADM stated R1 has physical therapy treatment. ADM stated based on R1's plan of care dated 05/22/2025, R1 was able to ambulate with 4-wheeled walker and after 05/16/2025, R1 used a wheelchair all the time and had not been ambulating in the facility. ADM stated R1's family member visits R1 very often and should be aware of R1 used wheelchair before October 2025. LPA interviewed 2 caregivers (S3, S4). Both stated R1 used walker and wheelchair before October 2025 and needs staff assistance. Based on the review of R1's Physical Therapy Plan of Care approval for R1 dated 05/22/2025, R1 used a wheelchair all the time and had not been ambulating in the facility since 05/16/2025. Staff do not provide responsible party with facility policies and procedures: The allegation is that staff did not respond to family member (FM) the request of facility's policies, procedures and plan of operation. On 01/15/2026, LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM). ADM stated he/she did not receive any request for facility policies and procedures from FM but he/she helped Community Outreach (CO) to prepare the document of the facility Plan of Operation, the facility emergency plan, the facility policy and procedures. LPA interviewed Community Outreach (CO). CO stated he/she received a request for application package from FM. CO stated he/she gave a whole package of documents including but not limited to, application procedures, admission agreement, plan of operation. CO stated after he/she provided the whole package of document to FM, FM did not complain and did not request any more document. CO provided a copy of the application package. LPA interviewed a Med Tech (S5). S5 stated FM requested Medication Administration Records (MARs). S5 stated he/she provided the MARs to FM. Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 3 of 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on the investigation, observation, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegation is UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with CO. This report was provided to review and for signature. A copy of this report was provided to CO. Page 4 of 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed: The allegation is that facility staff did not distribute resident R1's medication M1 on 12/03/2025 for PM shift. On 01/15/2026, LPA interviewed a Med Tech (S5). S5 stated one day in December 2025. R1's family member (FM) took R1 for doctor appointment. FM requested R1's MAR. S5 stated he/she provided R1's MARs to FM and FM found on 12/03/2025, PM shift, the item of R1's medication M1 without staff initial. S5 stated he/she knew R1's M1 was administered for 12/03/2025 PM shift but just the Med Tech (S6) forgot to initiate it. S5 stated he/she explained it to FM. On 01/17/2026, 11:20AM, LPA interviewed Med Tech(S6). S6 stated he/she did administer medication M1 to R1 on 12/03/2025, at bedtime but he/she forgot to initiate it. S6 stated he/she initiated it at another day. Based on the review of R1's December 2025 MARS, on 12/03/2025, the medication M1 PM shift was observed with staff initial. The department has investigated the above allegation. Based on the records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur. No deficiencies or citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with CO. A copy of this report was provided to CO. Page 2 of 2.
2025-09-16Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced annual inspection was conducted of this 45-resident facility, which included a tour of all common areas, bedrooms, and bathrooms, plus a review of resident and staff files. The inspector found the facility to be in compliance with licensing requirements, including adequate food storage, proper medication and chemical storage security, working safety systems, and appropriate temperature controls for food and hot water. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Debbie Cota. ADM informed that 45 residents and 20 staff in the facility. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. LPA toured the facility with ADM. Lobby, common area, activity room, kitchen, dining room, laundry room, salon room, break room, storage room, and restrooms were inspected. 29 shared resident bedrooms were inspected. 2 bedrooms shared with one restroom and 1 single room with restroom, 3 common shower rooms and common restrooms were inspected. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. The temperature of refrigerator was observed at 40 degree F and the temperature of the freezer was observed at -5 degree F. Medication room was observed locked. Cleaning product room was observed locked. Room temperature was at 73 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 106 degree F in facility. The fall prevention alarm system was tested and was working. First aid boxes were observed in the facility. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 9/24/2024. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. carbon monoxide detector were tested and were observed working. The courtyard and backyard were toured. The last time the facility conducted the fire drill was on 6/12/2025. ADM stated the facility conducts fire drill every quarter. No citation were noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of the reports was provided to ADM.
2025-07-10Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A licensing analyst visited the facility to evaluate two residents for a total care exception request. One resident was able to communicate their needs through speech and gestures, so no exception was needed at this time; the other resident showed no ability to communicate their needs, so the facility will be allowed to proceed with a total care exception request for that resident. No violations were found during the visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve conducted a case management visit to assess resident R1 and R2 for total care exception request. LPA met with Administrator Debbie Cota (ADM) and stated the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit, LPA met resident R1. Resident R1 is dependent on staff to care and supervise R1's activity's of daily living (ADLs). LPA introduced self to R1. LPA asked R1's name but R1 did not reply. ADM asked if R1 wants to eat something and R1 replied yes. ADM gave a spoon of pudding to R1 to eat and asked if R1 likes it. R1 replied yes. ADM asked R1 if R1 needs more pudding and R1 replied yes. ADM gave more spoons of pudding to R1 and asked R1 if R1 likes it. R1 replied yes. ADM asked R1 if R1 is happy and R1 answered yes. ADM asked R1 if R1 needs some water and R1 shook his head no. LPA asked R1 if R1 is happy. R1 smiled and replied yes. Based on the observation, R1 is able to communicate his/her needs/likes by verbal communication and shaking head. Based on the observation, total care exception is not needed at the time for R1. The facility staff shall continue to document R1’s condition and care provided should be kept in R1's files. Any changes in R1’s condition should be reported immediately to R1's primary care physician, responsible party and licensing agency. Facility staff will monitor R1's health care needs and collaborate with R1's primary physician regarding care. Facility staff shall ensure R1's Appraisal Needs and Services Plan is updated annually or as needed if the resident experiences significant physical or mental changes. Facility shall provide ongoing annual staff training specific to the needs of resident and shall be documented in facility records. Continue on LIC809-C, page 1 of 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Administrator shall notify the Department if there are any changes to R1 wherein R1 is not able to communication his/her needs and Administrator can submit total care exception to retain resident at the facility at that time. LPA met resident R2. Resident R2 is dependent on staff to care and supervise R2's activity's of daily living (ADLs). LPA introduced self to R2 and asked R2 question. R2 had no response. ADM asked R2 if R2 needs anything to eat. R2 had no response. ADM asked if R2 wants to eat pudding and R2 had no response. ADM gave couple spoons of pudding to R2 and R2 ate it. ADM asked if R2 likes it. R2 had no response. A caregiver S1 asked R2 if R2 wants to eat anything. R2 had no response. S1 gave spoons of pudding to R2 and R2 ate it. S1 asked if R2 needs to drink some water. R2 had no response. S1 gave R2 some water to sip. S1 asked if R1 likes it. R1 had no response. Based on the observation, R2 is unable to communicate his/her needs. Based on the observation, total care exception is needed at the time for R2. The Department will proceed to process the total care exception request for R2. ADM will provide documents if needed. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was reviewed with ADM and a copy of the report was provided.
2024-10-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On October 22, 2024, one resident slapped another resident at the front desk after the second resident became upset and began pushing computer monitors; staff were present and separated the residents immediately, and no physical injury was noted. During a follow-up visit in October 2024, the investigator interviewed staff and the administrator, who confirmed the residents had no prior history of fighting and both have memory-related cognitive disorders. The investigator determined no further action was needed.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management visit in regards an incident report, which stated a resident had struck another resident. LPA's met with Administrator Administrator Debbie Cota. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. On October 23, 2024, the Department received an incident report, regarding resident R1. The incident report stated on October 22, 2024, at approximately 7:15pm, resident R2 was upset at the front desk. R2 was pushing the front desk computer and was aggressive with staff when re-direction was attempted. Resident R1 was nearby and saw what was happening and became upset. R1 got up and slapped R2 in the face. Both residents were separated. No physical harm was note on R2's face. The incident report states that staff S1 and S2 were present during the alleged slap. On October 25, 2024, LPA Manuel Monter interviewed resident R1 and R2. Resident R1 was asleep and could not be interviewed during LPA's visit. Resident R2 stated he/she does not remember the slapping incident that occurred on October 22, 2024. LPA interviewed staff S1. S1 stated he/she was getting ready to clocked out and was at the front desk, while staff S2, was working at the front desk. S1 stated resident R1 was sitting on a grey chair, 5 feet away from the front desk. S1 stated he/she observed resident R2 walk from the dinning room towards the front desk, and was upset. S1 stated R2 began to make a commotion and was pushing the monitors. S1 stated he/she attempted to de-escalate R2. S1 stated R1 then suddenly stood up and slapped R2. S1 stated after being slapped, R2 calmed down and S2 escorted R2 towards his/her bedroom. Staff S1 stated resident R1 and R2 did not have an argument or altercation earlier that day. Haven't seen any physical altercations between them in the past. Page 1 Out of 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA interviewed ADM. ADM stated R1 and R2 do not have a history of fighting with each other. ADM stated R1 likes to sit in the front desk area, away from the other residents. ADM stated R1 does not enjoy R2's company due to being intrusive, such as trying to helpful. ADM stated she submitted updated care plans for both residents to CCL. Based on record review, Residents R1 and R2 have Neurocognitive disorder. LPA determined that the above incident does not require further investigation. This report was reviewed with Administrator Debbie Cota and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 Out of 2. END OF REPORT.
2024-09-20Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced annual inspection on this date found the facility in compliance with state requirements. The inspector reviewed resident and staff files, toured all areas including bedrooms and common spaces, and verified that food storage, medication security, emergency call systems, and fire safety equipment were in place; the facility replaced expired fire extinguishers during the inspection. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Director of Community relations Diana (DCR) Jane Gutierrez. DCR informed that 50 residents and 29 staff in the facility. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. LPA toured the facility with DCR. Lobby, common area, activity room, kitchen, dining room, laundry room, Salon room, break room, storage room, and restrooms were inspected. 28 shared resident bedrooms were inspected. 2 bedrooms shared with one restrooms and 1 single room with restroom, 3 common shower rooms and common restrooms were observed. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. The temperature of refrigerator was observed at 40 degree F and the temperature of the freezer was observed at -10 degree F. Medication room was observed locked. Cleaning product room was observed locked. Room temperature was at 70 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 106 degree F in facility. The emergency call in the resident room was tested and staff came within 1 minute. First aid boxes were observed in the facility. Fire extinguisher was found expired. The bought new Fire extinguishers and installed them before LPA finished the annual inspection. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors were tested and were observed working. The courtyard and backyard were toured. The last time the facility conducted the fire drill was on 6/18/2024. No citation were noted today. Exit interview was conducted with DCR. This report was provided to DCR for signature. A copy of the reports was provided to DCR.
2 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.
2 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.
Other facilities in Santa Clara County.
Other memory care facilities in Santa Clara County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
