Caleo Bay Alzheimer's Special Care Center.

On July 10, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection and met with Executive Director, Maria Arriaga. The facility file review was conducted at the Regional Office and additional records were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for 66 Adults and is currently operating at a capacity of 46 Adults (740). The facility has a dementia program and approval for locked perimeters with an alarm and signal system. The facility does not have any bodies of water. The facility is approved for 20 hospice residents; currently the facility has 15 residents receiving hospice services. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with Maria Arriaga and made observations pertaining to the annual visit. LPA inspected the facility inside and outside. There were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. The facility is a Community type facility located at 47805 Caleo Bay Drive La Quinta, CA. 92253. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760) 771-6100 and it is operable. LPA Mixson observed a sampling of the residents’ living units, and each was equipped with required furniture as per Title 22 at the time of this annual inspection. LPA Mixson inspected a sample of the facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. LPA Mixson observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something,” the "Personal Rights," and the PUB 475. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the residents and staff files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care currently at the time of this visit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Medications : Were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. There were a sufficient supply of medication for each resident. Overall facility is clean, furniture is in good condition, the Community Facility is free of odors. Facility's cooling system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Licensee informed LPA there were night lights for safety throughout the facility, for night. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharp items are locked. Care & Supervision / Administration: Adequate staff are present for the supervision of resident in care, and floor plans, telephone numbers and personal rights were found posted throughout the facility. Listed Administrator possesses a current administrator’s certificate with an expiration date of 11/07/2026, Maria Arriaga. LPA observed it is posted in the facility. Records Reviewed and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed staff files and reviewed the staff schedule. Staff files reviewed have criminal clearance and updated training along with First Aid Certification. Resident files reviewed possessed requested documentation and current weight records. Disaster preparedness: LPA Mixson reviewed facility's emergency and disaster plan as well as disaster training binder. LPA observed the last fire drill was conducted on 06/19/2025, was facilitated by Licensee, and met regulations. Infection Control: LPA Mixson observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms, PPE equipment, and cleaning supplies. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and found required infection control measures. There were no observable deficiencies noted or cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations at the time of this annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed and given to Executive Director, Maria Arriaga.

party made the request for S1 not take care of Resident #2 (R2), as they felt S1 was rough and upsets R2. On 11/30/23, Further documentation revealed that Resident #3 (R3) made the statement while being in the hallway and observing S1 and stating "hey that's the one had pulled my hair". Per Executive Director Maria a body check was conducted and there were no visible marks or bruises observed. In addition S1 denied the allegation, and handling any residents in a rough manner and pulling their hair. S1 stated that most residents require Per an interview conducted with R1, R1 could not identify S1 when shown a picture or recall the incident. R2 and R3 were unable to be qualified as a witnesses due to their medical diagnosis. On 12/01/23 the facility called and self reported the incident, and explained the actions that were taken as well as there was an active investigation pending and the staff was suspended and unable to return to work until the conclusion of the investigation, which will lead to termination of employment. Therefore based on observations, interviews and records review the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of report was reviewed and provided to Maria Arriaga, Executive Director.

with feeding as indicated or needed. Per interviews with multiple facility staff revealed corroborated what was documented in R1s progress notes. Which was R1 would eat some days, and would not eat others, but the attempts were made. There is insufficient evidence to corroborate or refute the allegation of facility staff did not assist resident with meals as needed , therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report was reviewed and provided along with the 9099C, and appeal rights were given to Executive Director Maria Arriaga.