Arizona · Tucson

Sedona Springs Assisted Living.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(520) 971-2539
Peer rank
Top 34% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 10-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jan 2026
Last citation
Jan 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Sedona Springs Assisted Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Sedona Springs Assisted Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
54th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
43rd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: JAN 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
JAN 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

4
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2026-01-27
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-113.A · 1 finding

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Sedona Springs Assisted Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-113.AA.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A

Based on record review and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, which included an annual assessment of the health care institution’s risk of exposure to infectious TB.       Findings include:       1. A review of facility documentation revealed an annual assessment of the facility's risk of exposure to infectious TB, dated July 22, 2024. However, evidence of documentation of an assessment conducted since July 2024 was unavailable for review.        2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

2024-07-16
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-02-01
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2023-09-26
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 3 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation required by this Article was provided to the Department within two hours after a Department request. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance as the licensee did not provide the Department with the requested documentation required by this Article. Findings include: 1. On September 26, 2023, the Compliance Officer requested the following documents during the on-site inspection: - Disaster drills for employees; and - Evacuation drills with employees and residents. 2. In an interview, E1, and E2 acknowledged this information was not provided to the Compliance Officer within two hours after a Department request.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's staffing schedule revealed two shifts: - 7:00 am - 7:00 pm (First Shift), and - 7:00 pm - 7:00 am (Second Shift). 2. A review of documentation titled, "Disaster Drill" revealed the following information: - April 27, 2023, time: 2:00 pm to 2:30 pm (first shift), - January 10, 2023, time: 9:00 am to 9:20 am (first shift), - January 10, 2023, time: 8:00 pm to 8:25 pm (second shift), There was no additional documentation or evidence to indicate a disaster drill was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. This documentation was not provided to the Compliance Officer within two hours after a Department request. 3. In an interview, E1, and E2 reported doing the drills, however, the documentation was unavailable for review.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted at least once every six months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a way to exit the facility in the event of an emergency was not posted. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's documentation revealed an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted on the following days; - April 27, 2023, at 9:00 am to 9:30 am; and - April 27, 2023, at 8:00 pm to 8:30 pm. There was no additional documentation or evidence to indicate an evacuation drill was conducted at least once every six months. This documentation was not provided to the Compliance Officer within two hours after a Department request. 2. In an interview, E1, and E2 reported doing the evacuation drills, however, the documentation was unavailable for review.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.