Arizona · Tucson

Rosa's Chante Assisted Living Home.

Care Facility9 bedsDementia-trained staff(520) 751-1998
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 27% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 9-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
9
Last inspection
Mar 2024
Last citation
Dec 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Rosa's Chante Assisted Living Home

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Rosa's Chante Assisted Living Home
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
60th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
60th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: DEC 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
DEC 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2025-12-23
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 2 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Rosa's Chante Assisted Living Home, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident which included the information prescribed in subsection A of this section, and failed to periodically update the form as necessary. The deficient practice posed a risk to resident health as an out of date list of medications was provided to emergency responders. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed an incident report, dated December 20, 2025 at 12:35 PM. The incident report form stated, "pt coughing at table...called 911, difficulty breathing- presented DNR, pt had a pulse, EMS placed on floor patio, begin CPR then stopped. TPD responded / OME responded, OME took body." 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a copy of an emergency responder packet for R2 which consisted of a face sheet, a DNR form, and a medication list. However, the document did not include the reason for contacting emergency medical services, and did not include the pharmacy address or a statement whether R2 required medication services. Additionally, the attached list of medications was dated June 12, 2024 and included the following medications: "Zyprexa 5 MG PO BID, Lisinopril 20 MG PO QD, Buspirone 10 MG PO BID, Eliquis 2.5 MG PO BID, and Tylenlol, 325 MG PO 4HRS/PRN." 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed a list of medication orders, dated September 30, 2025, which included the following medications, "Olanzapine 7.5 MG PO BID, Lisinopril 20 MG PO BID, Buspirone 10 MG PO TID, Low Dose Aspirin 81 MG, PO QD, Tylenol 325 MG PO 4 HRS/PRN, Mirtazapine 30 MG PO QD, and Depakote 125 MG PO BID." 4. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-811.CA.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of the resident’s needs required in R9-10-807(B), documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis as required in R9-10-807(A), or documentation of the determination in R9-10-812(3), for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs and false or misleading information was provided to the Department. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a baseline screening for Tuberculosis form. The form was dated one day prior to R1's date of acceptance. However, the form had a photocopied signature of a medical practitioner, and the rest of the form, including the date of the medical practitioner's signature, was filled out with a blue pen. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a form titled "Determination for Admission," which covered R9-10-807(B). The form was dated one day prior to R1's date of acceptance. However, the form had a photocopied signature of a medical practitioner, and the rest of the form, including the date of the medical practitioner's signature, was filled out with a blue pen. 3. A review of R1's medical record revealed a form titled "Approval for Behavioral Care," which covered R9-10-812(3). The form was dated one day prior to R1's date of acceptance. However, the form had a photocopied signature of a medical practitioner, and the rest of the form, including the date of the medical practitioner's signature, was filled out with a blue pen. Additionally, the date the medical practitioner had allegedly examined R1 had been left blank. 4. A review of R1's medical record revealed a second set of all three aforementioned documents which appeared to have an original signature and date by the same medical practitioner, except for the Determination for Admission, which was signed but not dated. However, all three documents were dated 14 days after R1's date of acceptance. 5. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

2024-03-28
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.