Arizona · Tucson

Park Senior Villas at la Canada - Villa a.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 218-7627
Peer rank
Top 41% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 10-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Apr 2026
Last citation
Apr 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Park Senior Villas at la Canada - Villa a

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Park Senior Villas at la Canada - Villa a
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
13th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
64th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J2
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D1
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

4
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2026-04-23
Annual Compliance Visit
Enforcement · 2 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Park Senior Villas at la Canada - Villa a, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

EnforcementA.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.10
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.10

Based on observation, record review, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training before providing assisted living services for one of two personnel records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.   Findings include:   1. During a tour of the facility, the compliance officer observed E3 working as a caregiver during the inspection.   2. A review of E3's personnel record revealed documentation of CPR and first aid training which expired on December 6, 2025. 3. A review of the facility’s policy and procedure manual revealed a policy titled “CPR & First Aid Policy & Procedures”. The “PROCEDURE” stated, “1. Before providing personal or directed care services to a resident, a manager, caregiver, or volunteer provides documentation of CPR and First Aid training that: a. Is current at all times…” 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

EnforcementA.A.C. § RR9-10-817.B.3.b
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.B.3.b

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order for one of two resident records reviewed.  Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed R2 received personal care services and medication administration. 2. Further review of R2’s medical record revealed a signed list of medication orders dated January 14, 2026, for "MIDODRINE HCL 5 MG TABLET … TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH EVERY 8 HOURS FOR HYPOTENSION *HOLD FOR SBP OVER 130*”.   3. A review of R2’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated April 2026 revealed R2 was administered Midodrine 5 MG on the following dates when the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was above 130:   - On April 5, 2026, R2’s recorded SBP 136; - On April 11, 2026, at 6 am, R2’s recorded SBP 135; - On April 11, 2026, at 10 pm, R2’s recorded SBP 135; - On April 17, 2026, R2’s recorded SBP 136; and  - On April 23, 2026, R2’s recorded SBP 132. 4. Further review of R2’s MAR revealed R2 was not administered Midodrine 5 MG on April 7, 2026, when R2’s recorded SBP was 125. 5. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

2024-10-25
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-08-05
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a facility authorized to provide directed care services had a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort and provided access to an outside area which controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a potential elopement risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the Department's documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed when exiting from a back door leading to the backyard, no alarm sounded to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. Further inspection of the alert revealed it was switched to the off position. 3. In an interview E1 acknowledged the back door did not have a door alarm turned on, to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The Compliance Officer observed E1 switch the alert to the on position and verify it was operational.

2023-11-21
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.