Khadi Care Center LLC.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-05-20Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-807.D.5 · 4 findings
“Based on record review and interview, for two of two sampled residents, the documented residency agreement did not include whether the manager or a caregiver would be awake during nighttime hours. Findings include: A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed each resident had a residency agreement. The agreements included a section to mark whether the manager or a caregiver would be awake during nighttime hours. However, this section had not been filled out on both agreements. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident requiring behavioral care included the psychosocial interactions or behaviors for which the resident requires assistance, psychotropic medications ordered for the resident, planned strategies and actions for changing the resident’s psychosocial interactions or behaviors, and goals for changes in the resident’s psychosocial interactions or behaviors, for one of two sampled residents. Findings include: A review of R1's medical record revealed a list of medical diagnoses, including "Schizophrenia" and "Bipolar." A review of R1's medical record revealed a list of medication orders, dated April 15, 2026, which included "Risperidone," "Olanzapine," and "Hydroxyzine." A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan, dated April 3, 2026, for directed care services. The service plan included the service "Schizophrenia: Symptoms: hitting staff when assisting with needs. 1) Make sure [R1] takes their medication for schizophrenia as prescribed. 2) If delusional don't argue with [R1]. 3) Encourage [R1] by telling them their strengths and complimenting them on any achievements. 4) If [R1] acts out, communicate clearly using simple, direct statements." The service plan also included the service "Bipolar. Symptoms: yelling and hitting staff when they are assisting with his needs. 1) Notify [R1's medical practitioner] who's prescribing psychiatric medications if [R1] refuses to take any of those medications or if [R1] becomes more hyper (active) or less active (depressed) as this may mean a change in their bipolar disease. 2) Monitor each shift for: mood changes 3) Interventions that work: Talking to [R1] in calm voice and letting him know why you are assisting him." However, R1's service plan did not include the psychotropic medications ordered for R1 or the goals for changes in R1's psychosocial interactions or behaviors. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident who required behavioral care was reviewed by a medical practitioner or behavioral health professional, for one of two sampled residents. Findings include: A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan, updated April 3, 2026, for directed care services including behavioral health services. However, the service plan was not reviewed by a medical practitioner or behavioral health professional. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two sampled residents. Findings include: A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan, updated January 26, 2026, for personal care services, including medication administration A review of R2's medical record revealed a signed list of medication orders, dated April 15, 2026, which included the order "Amlodipine 10MG tablet, take 1 tablet by mouth once a day for HTN. Hold for SBP <100." A review of R2's medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated April 2026. The MAR indicated "Amlodipine Besylate 10 MG, Take 1 tablet by mouth once a day for HTN, Hold for SBP < 100" had been administered to R2 on each day in April 2026. However, documentation of R2's systolic blood pressure had not been documented prior to the administration of Amlodipine on any day in April 2026. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.”
2025-04-22Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-806.A.8 · 3 findings
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee or volunteer included documentation of evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two personnel sampled. R9-10-113. A states: "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page, located at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5417a1.htm, titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." This guideline states: "If TST (Mantoux Skin Test) is used for baseline testing, two-step testing is recommended for HCWs (Health Care Workers) whose initial TST results are negative. If the first-step TST result is negative, the second-step TST should be administered 1-3 weeks after the first TST result was read." A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page, located at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5417a1.htm, titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." This guideline states: Baseline Testing for M. tuberculosis Infection After TST Within the Previous 12 Months: "A second TST is not needed if the HCW has a documented TST result from any time during the previous 12 months. If a newly employed HCW has had a documented negative TST result within the previous 12 months, a single TST can be administered in the new setting (Box 1). This additional TST represents the second stage of two-step testing. The second test decreases the possibility that boosting on later testing will lead to incorrect suspicion of transmission of M. tuberculosis in the setting." A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page, located at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5417a1.htm, titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." This guideline states: Findings include: 1. A review of E2's personnel record revealed documentation of a baseline screening including a single step negative TB skin test, dated 50 days after E2's date of hire. However, documentation of a second step negative TB skin test was not available for review at the time of inspection. E2's personnel record also included a negative single-step TB test dated in 2023, more than twelve months prior to E2's date of hire. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E2's personnel record did not contain complete documentation of TB requirements at the time of the inspection.”
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate a currently licensed manager in writing. The deficient practice posed a risk as the assisted living facility did not have a licensed manager for approximately 80 days. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed an application submitted October 5, 2024, designating E1 as the manager of the facility. 2. The Compliance Officer observed E1's managers license posted in the facility. 3 . Online verification of E1's manager's license at https://aznciab.portalus.thentiacloud.net/webs/portal/#/ revealed E1's license had expired on January 31, 2025. 4. In an interview, E1 reported being unaware that E1's managers license had expired and thinking licenses expired in June every other year. E1 reported E1 would contact the Arizona Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers board immediately and if E1's license had expired, E1 would immediately designate another manager. 5. A review of department records revealed E1 notified the Department on April 22, 2025, the day of the on-site inspection, of the appointment of a new manager, E3.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure, for one of two sampled residents, a residency agreement was signed and dated by the manager before or at the time of a resident's acceptance by the assisted living facility. Findings include: A review of R1's medical record revealed a residency agreement which was signed and dated by the governing authority. However, the governing authority had signed the residency agreement twelve days after R1's time of acceptance. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's residency agreement had not been signed before or at the time of R1's time of acceptance.”
2024-09-27Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-04-26Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-02-22Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Tucson.
Other memory care facilities near Tucson with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



