Helping Hands 2.

A small home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-07-31Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-817.F.1 · 3 findings
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage. Findings include: 1. During a tour of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed a kitchen cabinet, which was not secured. Inside the cabinet, the Compliance Officers observed a box marked “Thereflu Severe Cold Relief, Acetaminophen, Dextromethorphan HBR.” Inside the box, the Compliance Officers observed three blue and white capsules, enclosed in a blister pack. The back of the packaging read “Rosel, Amantadina, Clorfenamina, Paracetamol, Capsula 50 mg/3 mg/300 mg.” 2. In an interview, E1 advised the Rose medication was from Mexico and was used for treating flu symptoms. E1 agreed the medications stored at the facility were not in a locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit as required.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift, at least once every three months, and documented. Findings include: 1. A review of facility staffing schedules revealed the facility operated three shifts: days, 7:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m., swing shift, 3:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m., and nights, 11:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed evidence of documentation of an employee disaster drill conducted during the day shift on September 3, 2024 and December 9, 2024, on the swing shift on October 5, 2024, and January 5, 2025, and the night shift on August 4, 2024, and January 5 and February 5, 2025. However, evidence of documentation of any additional employee disaster drills conducted on any shift, after February 5, 2025, was unavailable for review.. 3. In an interview, E1 agreed disaster drills were not being conducted on each shift, at least once every three months, and documented.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the premises and equipment used at the assisted living facility were free from a condition or situation which may cause a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury. Findings include: 1. During a tour of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed exposed electrical wiring, dangling within arm's reach, outside a resident’s bedroom. The exposed wiring was attached to a metal plate, possibly from a lighting fixture. The wiring ends were capped; however, the insulation had been stripped, and exposed copper wire was observed. 2. In an interview, E1 agreed the exposed wire presented a hazardous condition which may cause an individual harm due to electric shock.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Tucson.
Other memory care facilities near Tucson with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



