Care Haven #1 Trejo, LLC.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-10-02Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-807.A · 4 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) within seven calendar days after the resident's date of occupancy and as specified in R9-10-113 for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings Include: 1. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a negative TB skin test; however, documentation of a baseline screening to include risk assessment and symptom screening was not available for review. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E3 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on record review and interview, for one of two residents sampled, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every three months. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a service plan, dated June 17, 2025, for directed care services. However, service plan updates dated on or before September 17, 2025, were unavailable for review. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E3. E3 acknowledged R1’s record did not include a written service plan update dated at least once every three months.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster plan was documented which included where residents would be relocated. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility’s documentation revealed an amended disaster and evacuation plan dated May 10, 2024; however, the disaster and evacuation plan did not provide an address as to where residents would be relocated and instead listed the same address as their facility. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E3 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility’s documentation revealed an amended disaster and evacuation plan dated June 22, 2020, last reviewed on May 10, 2024. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E3 and no additional information was provided.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Tucson.
Other memory care facilities near Tucson with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience