Golden Springs Senior Living, LLC.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2024-09-24Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 6 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of the individual's skills and knowledge applicable to the individual's job duties, for two of three sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee did not possess the skills and knowledge to meet the needs of residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E2's and E3's personnel record revealed documentation of verification of skills and knowledge was not available for review at the time of inspection. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E2's and E3's personnel record did not include documented verification of E2's and E3's skills and knowledge at the time of the inspection.”
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee or volunteer included documentation of evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), if required for the individual according to subsection (A)(8), for one of three sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113(B)(1)(a)(i) states: "B. A health care institution's chief administrative officer shall: 1. For an individual for whom baseline screening and documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis is required by an Article in this Chapter...obtain one of the following as evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis: a. Documentation of a negative Mantoux skin test or other tuberculosis screening test that: i. Is recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)." 2. A review of E3's personnel record revealed documentation of a negative TB skin test. However, documentation of a second TB skin test and TB screening was not available for review at the time of inspection. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E3's personnel records did not contain documentation of a second TB skin test and TB screening at the time of the inspection.”
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if staff were unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an alert and control on the front door and an alert on the door leading to the backyard. However, the alerts were not turned on, and the control was not locked. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the front and back door had no functioning control or alert. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance inspection conducted on July 18, 2023.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper medication administration. Findings include: 1. In an interview, E1 reported all residents receive medication administration. 2. A review of R1's medical record at approximately 10:30 AM revealed signed medication orders for the following medications: -Levetiracetam 500 MG 1 tablet by mouth twice a day; -Gabapentin 800 MG 1 tablet by mouth three times a day; and -Midodrine 5 MG 1 tablet by mouth three times a day. However, a review of R1's Medication Administration Record (MARs) for September 2024 revealed the following medications marked as administered: -Levetiracetam on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM ; -Gabapentin on September 24, 2024 at 12:00 PM and 5:00 PM ; and -Midodrine on September 24, 2024 at 12:00 PM and 5:00 PM. 3. A review of R2's medical record at approximately 10:30 AM revealed signed medication orders for the following medications: -Levetiracetam 500 MG 1 tablet by mouth twice a day; -Gabapentin 800 MG 1 tablet by mouth three times a day; -Elequis 5 MG 1 tablet by mouth twice a day; -Amitriptyline 10 MG 1 1/2 tablets at bedtime; -Tamsulosin .4 MG 1 cap by mouth daily; -Simvastatin 10 MG 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime; and -Mitrazapine 45 MG 1/2 tablet by mouth at bedtime. However, a review of R1's Medication Administration Record (MARs) for September 2024 revealed the following medications marked as administered: -Levetiracetam on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM; -Gabapentin on September 24, 2024 at 12:00 PM and 5:00 PM; -Elequis on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM; -Amitriptyline on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM; -Tamsulosin on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM; -Simvastatin on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM; and -Mitrazapine on September 24, 2024 at 8:00 PM. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged medication was not administered to residents in compliance with a medication order.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident received orientation to the exits from the assisted living facility and the route to be used when evacuating the assisted living facility within 24 hours after acceptance, for one of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed an orientation form signed on February 2, 2024. However, neither date was within 24 hours after acceptance. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation was not completed showing R1 was oriented to the facility's evacuation routes and plans 24 hours after acceptance.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents with access to the materials. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a container of "Comet" bleach cleaning powder and a container of "Ultimate Clean" dishwasher packets in an unlocked cabinet under the sink. The Compliance Officer also observed a can of "Lysol" disinfectant spray on the countertop in the master bedroom. 2. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a door leading to the garage. The control for the door was not locked, and the door had a stopper which was able to be disengaged. When the door was opened, the Compliance Officer observed multiple cans of "Lysol" disinfectant spray, "Resolve" urine destroyer, and "Odoban" disinfectant spray sitting on a shelf. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the aforementioned poisonous or toxic materials were not stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents at the time of the inspection. This is a repeat citation from the compliance inspection conducted on July 18, 2023.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Surprise.
Other memory care facilities near Surprise with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
A Loving Heart Assisted Living LLC
Surprise
About Seniors Assisted Living Home, LLC
Surprise
Vip Assisted Living LLC
Surprise
Desert Hills Heart of Gold Assisted Living
Surprise
Hope Assisted Living
Surprise
The Oasis at Fellowship Square Surprise
Surprise
Cozy Home Care LLC
Surprise
Care First - Group Home
Surprise


