A Place for Your Loved Ones.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-09-15Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-817.F.1 · 1 finding
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure when medication was stored by an assisted living facility, medication was stored in a self-contained unit used only for medication storage. Findings include: 1 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an unlocked refrigerator. Inside the refrigerator was an black metal container with a combination lock. When the Compliance Officer removed the container and turned the latch to unlock the container without changing the numbers on the combination lock, the container opened, and medication was accessible. 2 . In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E4 and no additional information was provided.”
2025-06-02Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-09-13Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 6 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical records revealed documentation dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant to include whether R1 was expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care services, or directed care services, or required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, was completed on December 8, 2022. However, the documentation was not completed 90 calendar days before R1 was accepted by the assisted living facility. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation was not dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility for R1.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113(B)(2)(a-b) states: "B. A health care institution's chief administrative officer shall: 2. As part of the annual assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (A)(2)(d), ensure that documentation is obtained for each individual required to be screened for infectious tuberculosis that: a. Indicates the individual's freedom from symptoms of infectious tuberculosis; and b. Is signed by a medical practitioner, occupation health provider, as defined in A.A.C. R9-6-801, or local health agency, as defined in A.A.C. R9-6-101." 2. A review of R1's medical records revealed documentation of freedom from TB. However, documentation of TB screening was not available for review at the time of inspection. 3. In an interview, E2 acknowledged failure to ensure R1's medical record contained documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis.”
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility to the outside area allowing the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed a door in the master bedroom leading to the back porch allowed a resident to be at least 30 ft away from the facility. However, the door did not control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. 3. In an interview, E2 acknowledged E1 failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility to the outside area allowing the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident received orientation to the exits from the assisted living facility and the route to be used when evacuating the assisted living facility within 24 hours after acceptance, for two of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed an orientation form signed on February 17, 2022 by the manager and February 24, 2022 by the resident representative. However, neither date was within 24 hours after acceptance. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed an orientation form signed on February 15, 2024 by the manager and February 29, 2024 by the resident representative. However, neither date was within 24 hours after acceptance. 2. In an interview, E2 acknowledged documentation was not completed showing R1 and R2 was oriented to the facility's evacuation routes and plans 24 hours after acceptance.”
“Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents with access to the poisonous or toxic materials. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a cabinet under the sink in the hallway bathroom. The door to the cabinet was hanging from one hinge, and falling off. Inside the cabinet was a bottle of "Oxi Clean" bathroom cleaner. 2. In an interview, E2 acknowledged the "Oxi Clean" bathroom clean was not stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure equipment used at the assisted living facility was maintained in working order. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a cabinet under the sink in the hallway bathroom. The door to the cabinet was hanging from one hinge, and falling off. 2. In an interview, E2 acknowledged the cabinet door under the sink in the hallway bathroom was not maintained in a working order.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Surprise.
Other memory care facilities near Surprise with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
A Loving Heart Assisted Living LLC
Surprise
A Parent's Paradise and Care LLC
Surprise
A Parent's Paradise LLC
Surprise
A Place for Your Loved Ones II
Surprise
Aa Love Care Home LLC
Surprise
Abigail's Assisted Living Home LLC
Surprise
About Seniors Assisted Living Home, LLC
Surprise
A Golden Retreat Care Home, LLC
Surprise


