Arizona · Surprise

Golden Senior Living.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 751-6938
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 26% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Surprise
A 10-bed Care Facility with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
Dec 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Golden Senior Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Golden Senior Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
48th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: DEC 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
DEC 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

5 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D5
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2025-12-05
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 5 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Golden Senior Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager did not ensure a standardized emergency responder patient information form as described in subsection A of this section, was completed and maintained for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practiced posed a risk as required patient information was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed a packet titled "Special Emergency Resident Medical Record" with documentation of a standardized emergency responder patient information form completed as required by Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1) through (9). However, the following were not included in the documentation: A standardized space to be filled in with the reason or reasons the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident; and A copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living center or assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the information required in A.R.S. § 36-420.04 was not prepared in a standardized emergency responder patient information form as required.

R9-10-807.AA.A.C. § RR9-10-807.A
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.A

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis before or within seven calendar days after the resident's date of occupancy, and as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed documentation of negative TB blood test from June 2025. However, documentation of a TB screening questionnaire was not available for review at the time of inspection. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was added.

R9-10-811.C.17A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C.17
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C.17

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza and pneumonia annually for two of two resident's sampled. Findings Include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation of offering the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations since October, 2024. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed no documentation of offering the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations was available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that there was no documentation of offering the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations to R1 and R2 annually.

R9-10-819.A.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's personnel schedule revealed the facility had two staff shifts.  2. A review of the facility's disaster drill documentation revealed a disaster drill conducted on the following dates and shifts: April 1, 2025 at 10:30AM indicated as the AM shift; and July 25, 2025 at 5:00PM. However, no documentation of disaster drills for each shift every three months was available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged a disaster drill for employees was not conducted at least once every three months on each shift and documented.

R9-10-819.A.5.aA.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.5.a
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.5.a

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted at least once every six months. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement the evacuation plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's evacuation drill documentation revealed documentation of evacuation drills conducted on two shifts April 30, 2025. However, documentation of additional drills was not available for review. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was provided.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.