Anastasia Assisted Living Home, LLC.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-04-18Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 5 findings
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution developed a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, including initial training and continued competency training. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a program or policy regarding when initial training and competency training is conducted for all staff members was not available for review at the time of inspection. 2. In an interview, E4 acknowledged documentation of a fall prevention and fall recovery program or policy regarding initial and competency training was not available for review.”
“Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to designate in writing a caregiver who is present on the assisted living facility's premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager is not present on the assisted living facility premises. Findings include: 1 . When the Compliance Officer arrived at the facility at approximately 9:30 AM, the Compliance Officer observed only E2 and E3 working on the premises. 2 . A review of facility documentation revealed a "Delegation of Authority." However, E2 was not listed on the delegation. E3 signed the document, but was not listed as a designee, and is an assistant caregiver. 3 . In an interview, E4 acknowledged that there was no documented designee on site while the manager was not on site.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record for one of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1 . A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan dated March 16, 2025. The service plan reported R2 was to receive two showers a week. However, a review of R2's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) sheet for the month of April 2025 revealed no documentation of a shower provided to R2 from April 10, 2025 to April 17, 2025. 2 . In an interview, E4 reported R2 had refused to take a shower multiple times; however, it was not documented on the ADL sheet. E4 acknowledged R2 had no documentation of showers being provided from April 10, 2025 to April 17, 2025.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that provides access to an outside area that controls or alerts employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an alert on the front door of the facility leading to the front yard. However, the alert was turned off, and the door had no control. 2 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a door leading to the garage which provided access to the front yard and the back yard. However, the door had no control or alert. 3 . In an interview, E4 acknowledged the front door alert was turned off, and the garage door had no control or alert.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility are inaccessible to residents. Findings include: 1 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a magnetic key attached to the dishwasher next to a cabinet underneath the sink. The cabinet underneath the sink was locked with magnetic locks. The Compliance Officer detached the magnetic key from the dishwasher and was able to disengage the magnetic locks on the cabinet and access a bottle of "Cascade" dishwasher detergent. 2 . In an interview, E4 acknowledged the magnetic key was left in a space which allowed the magnetic lock to be disengaged, allowing the toxins to be accessible.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Surprise.
Other memory care facilities near Surprise with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
A Loving Heart Assisted Living LLC
Surprise
About Seniors Assisted Living Home, LLC
Surprise
Vip Assisted Living LLC
Surprise
Desert Hills Heart of Gold Assisted Living
Surprise
Hope Assisted Living
Surprise
The Oasis at Fellowship Square Surprise
Surprise
Cozy Home Care LLC
Surprise
Care First - Group Home
Surprise