Desert Orchid Assisted Living.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-05-08Complaint InvestigationR9-10-806.A.4 · 1 finding
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver’s or assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented: Before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provides physical health services or behavioral health services, and according to policies and procedures, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include 1. While on-site for the compliant investigation, the Compliance Officer requested documentation, including personnel files for E1 and E2, and policies and procedures at approximately 12:51 PM. 2. A review of E2’s personnel file, documentation was not available regarding E2’s verification of skills and knowledge. 3. In an interview, E2 stated that E1 had an emergency and was not able to send all of E2's file at the time of the inspection and that E1 will email all of the information as soon as E2 could. The Compliance Officer left at approximately 3:00 pm. The Compliance Officer did not receive an email. 4. The Compliance Officer observed E2 interacting with residents and providing services at the facility at the time of inspection. 5. In an interview, E2 reported that E2’s date of hire was September 1, 2025. 6. Documentation of policies and procedures was unavailable at the time of the inspection. 7. In an interview, E2 reported that the documentation provided to the Compliance Officer was all the documentation available at that time. 8. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was provided.”
2025-12-04Other VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Scottsdale.
Other memory care facilities near Scottsdale with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

