Arizona · Scottsdale

Bell Adult Care Home.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 717-4097
Peer rank
Top 33% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Scottsdale
A 10-bed Care Facility with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jul 2025
Last citation
Oct 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Bell Adult Care Home

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Bell Adult Care Home
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
48th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
52nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2024. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2024
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

5 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D5
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

4
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2025-07-15
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Bell Adult Care Home, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2024-11-19
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-10-09
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a manager and caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification specific to adults for two of two managers or caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of E1's personnel record revealed documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification. However, the training certification expired on September 20, 2024. No more recent documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification was able for review for E1. 2. A review of E2's personnel record revealed documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification. However, the training certification expired on September 20, 2024. No more recent documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification was able for review for E2. 3. In an interview, E1 stated, "I have to renew it and I forgot to schedule the renewal training for myself and [E2]." E1 acknowledged E1's and E2's documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification had expired September 20, 2024.

2024-06-21
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 4 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before acceptance to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. Based on R1's acceptance date, this documentation was required. 2. A review of the facility's policy and procedures (revised June 2024) titled, "Scope of Services Provision of Assisted Living Services," revealed in section twelve, "The management will ensure that at the time of admission or earlier the resident or resident representative is required to provide the documentation no older than 90 days for the resident's need of continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, restraints, or behavior care. Documentation provided has to be signed appropriately. This documentation will be maintained in the resident records." 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1 did not provide documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza (flu) and pneumonia, according to A.R.S. \'a7 36-406(1)(d), to one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: A.R.S. \'a7 36-406(1)(d) The department shall: Require as a condition of licensure that nursing care institutions and assisted living facilities make vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia available to residents on site on a yearly basis. The department shall prescribe the manner by which the institutions and facilities shall document compliance with this subdivision, including documenting residents who refuse to be immunized. The department shall not impose a violation on a licensee for not making a vaccination available if there is a shortage of that vaccination in this state as determined by the director. 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed R1 refused the flu and pneumonia vaccinations May 2023. However, current documentation was not available that showed the flu and pneumonia vaccinations were received or refused. Based on R1's acceptance date, this documentation was required. 2. A review of the facility's policy and procedures (revised June 2024) titled, "Scope of Services Provision of Assisted Living Services," revealed in section twenty-four, "The facility will make influenza and pneumonia available on site to residents, on an annual basis, through ancillary services or primary care providers. The facility will document compliance with this requirement, including documentation for the residents who refused to be immunized." 3. In an interview, E2 acknowledged R1's medical record did not include current documentation that showed the flu and pneumonia vaccinations were received or refused.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort and provided access to an outside area which allowed the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed ambulatory residents in the facility. 3. The Compliance Officer observed two sliding glass doors exiting to the backyard did not have a device that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of the residents. 4. The Compliance Officer observed another accessible door leading out to the backyard did not have a device that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of the residents. 5. A review of the facility's policy and procedures (revised June 2024) titled, "Environmental and Physical Plant Safety" revealed in section four, "Exit doors and windows to the outside that a wandering resident may exit through will be alarmed to alert employees in the event a resident is wandering". 6. In an interview, E1 reported E1 was not aware doors leading outside needed to have a device that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of the residents.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed a door that had a deadbolt lock facing towards the interior hallway. However the Compliance Officer was able to unlock the door without the assistance of a key. Inside the room the following was observed: -A spray can of WD-40 was observed on top of a cabinet. Inside of a cabinet the following toxic materials were observed: - A 20 oz spray can of Raid bug spray - A spray can of Hot Shot Flying Insect Killer - A 32 oz spray bottle labeled, "Kills Ants" - A spray bottle of ArmorAll Protectant - A spray bottle of Cedarcide Scorpion Shield - A bottle of Instant Power Main Line Cleaner 2. The Compliance Officer observed a box of Polident Antibacterial Denture Cleanser (had a caution warning) on top of a toilet tank in a shared resident bathroom. In a different shared resident bathroom Clorox disinfectant wipes were stored in an unlocked cabinet below the sink. 3. The Compliance Officer observed the following toxic materials stored unlocked below the kitchen sink: - A spray can of Stainless Steel Polish & Cleaner - Magic Stainless Steel wipes 4. A review of the facility's Policy and Procedures (revised June 2024) revealed a policy titled, "Environmental and Physical Plant Safety" stated in section fifteen, "Poisonous and toxic materials will be in labeled containers and stored in a locked area separate from food preparation areas, dining areas, and medications and are inaccessible to residents." 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged toxic materials were stored unlocked.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.