Brookdale East Arbor.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 75 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-10-09Other VisitNo findings
2025-02-12Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-09-11Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 4 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for two of four residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a current service plan listing the services required by R1. 2. A review of facility incident reports revealed R1 had been sent to the hospital on August 29, 2024 and had not returned to the facility as of the date of the on-site inspection, September 11, 2024. 3. A review of R1's medical record revealed a form titled, "Resident Personalized Service Plan Signature Sheet," dated July 2024 through September 2024. However, the form included the following errors: - On August 29, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on the Evening and Nights shift; - On August 30, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on all three shifts; - On August 31, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on all three shifts; - On September 1, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on the Days and Evening shifts; - On September 2, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on the Evening shift; - On September 8, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on the Days and Evening shifts; and - On September 9, 2024, the form indicated services had been provided to R1 on the Days and Evening shifts. However, R1 was not present in the facility on any of these days and times and could not have received the documented services. 4. A review of R3's medical record revealed a service plan was current at the time of R3's discharge on October 27, 2023 and listed all services required by R3. 5. A review of R3's medical record revealed a form titled, "Resident Personalized Service Plan Signature Sheet," dated October 2023 through December 2023. However, the form included the following errors: - On October 6,7,12,13,14,15 and October 21, 2023, R3 had not received any services on the Days shift, however, the form had been left blank and did not include a code or other explanation why services had not been provided; - On October 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,and October 21, 2023, R3 had not received any services on the Evening shift, however, the form had been left blank and did not include a code or other explanation why services had not been provided; - On October 9,10,11,12,22 and October 23, 2023, R3 had not received any services on the Nights shift, however, the form had been left blank and did not include a code or other explanation why services had not been provided; - On October 28, 2023, after R3 had discharged, the form indicated services had been provided to R3 on the Nights shift; - On October 29, 2023, after R3 had discharged, the form indicated services had been provided to R3 on all three shifts; - On October 30, 2023, after R3 had discharged, the form indicated services had been provided to R3 on the Evening shift, and a mark in the evening shift section had been written over, obscuring the original mark; - On October 31, 2023, after R3 had discharged, the form indicated services had been provided to R3 on the Days shift, and a mark in the Evening shift section had been written over, obscuring the original mark; - On November 1, 2023, after R3 had discharged, the form indicated services had been provided to R3 on the Days shift. 4. In an interview, E1, E2, and E3 acknowledged the services provided to R1 and R3 had not been accurately documented in each resident's medical record.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication, and false or misleading information was provided to the department. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a service plan dated September 22, 2023 for Personal Care services including medication administration. 2. A review of R3's medical record revealed a list of medication orders, dated October 16, 2023 , which included: - "Start 09/22/2023, Hydralazine HCL Oral Tablet 25 MG. Dose: 2 Tab(s), Frequency: BID Instructions: Take two tabs by mouth two times a day for hypertension - hold for SBP below 140." 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed an electronic medication administration record (MAR) dated October 2023. The MAR indicated the following: - On October 6, 2023, at 0800, R3's blood pressure was documented to be 133/88, however, Hydralazine was administered to R3; - On October 8, 2023, at 0800, R3's blood pressure was documented to be 132/88, however, Hydralazine was administered to R3; - On October 9, 2023, at 0800, R3's blood pressure was documented to be 122/70, however, Hydralazine was administered to R3; - On October 27, 2023, at 0800, R3's blood pressure was documented to be 139/69, however, Hydralazine was administered to R3; - On October 8, 2023, at 1700, R3's blood pressure was documented to be 118/78, however, the Hydralazine was administered to R3; 4. In an interview, E1, E2, and E3 acknowledged medications had not been administered to R3 in compliance with a medication order.”
“Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication stored by the facility was stored in a separate locked area used only for medication storage. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan, updated July 19, 2024, for Personal care services including medication administration. 2. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a medicine cabinet in R2's private bathroom did not have a lock. Inside the medicine cabinet, the Compliance Officer observed containers of "Triple Antibiotic Ointment and Pain Relief" and, "Refresh Tears Lubricant Eye Drops." The medicine cabinet also included non-medication hygiene items, such as lotion, saline, and floss picks. 3. In an interview, E1, E2, and E3 acknowledged medication required to be stored by the facility was not stored in a separate locked area used only for medication storage.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the premises were free from a situation that may cause a resident to suffer physical injury. Findings include: 1. During an environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed the door to R4's room had been left unlocked and the room was not occupied at the time of the inspection. In an unlocked cabinet in the R4's private bathroom, the Compliance Officer observed a bottle of toilet bowl cleaner. In an unlocked closet in R4's bedroom, the Compliance Officer observed two containers of , "Swiffer Wet Jet" floor cleaner. 2. In an interview, E1 reported R4 received directed care services. E1, E2, and E3 acknowledged the premises were not free from a situation that may cause a resident to suffer physical injury.”
2024-05-15Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Other facilities in Mesa.
Other memory care facilities near Mesa with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



