Arizona · Glendale

Arizona's Golden Heart I.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 502-8524
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 24% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Glendale
A 10-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Sep 2025
Last citation
Sep 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Arizona's Golden Heart I

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Arizona's Golden Heart I
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
68th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
60th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: SEP 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
SEP 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2025-09-15
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-819.A.4 · 1 finding

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Arizona's Golden Heart I, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-819.A.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan.   Findings include: 1. A documentation review of the facility’s "Employee Disaster Drill Sheet” revealed that the last disaster drill was completed on December 10, 2024 for both shifts.   2. A review of the personnel schedule documented two shifts: 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM and 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM.   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented.

2024-10-01
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that for one of two sampled residents who were unable to ambulate even with assistance, the residents' primary care provider (PCP) or other medical practitioner signed a determination stating that the residents' needs were being met. This determination was to be completed at the time of acceptance or onset and at least once every six months throughout the duration of the residents' condition to determine if the resident's needs could be met based upon a current resident examination and the assisted living facility's scope of services, which posed a health and safety risk. The facility is licensed to provided directed care services. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's medical record revealed a documented determination dated January 30, 2024. Based on the date of acceptance there was no documentation to demonstrate the paperwork was updated at least every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition. The determination should have been based on a resident's current examination and the facility's scope of services that the resident's needs could be met. R2 required directed care services. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged there was no other documentation of the required determinations available for review.

2024-06-27
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.