Arizona's Golden Heart I.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-09-15Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-819.A.4 · 1 finding
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A documentation review of the facility’s "Employee Disaster Drill Sheet” revealed that the last disaster drill was completed on December 10, 2024 for both shifts. 2. A review of the personnel schedule documented two shifts: 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM and 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented.”
2024-10-01Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 1 finding
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that for one of two sampled residents who were unable to ambulate even with assistance, the residents' primary care provider (PCP) or other medical practitioner signed a determination stating that the residents' needs were being met. This determination was to be completed at the time of acceptance or onset and at least once every six months throughout the duration of the residents' condition to determine if the resident's needs could be met based upon a current resident examination and the assisted living facility's scope of services, which posed a health and safety risk. The facility is licensed to provided directed care services. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's medical record revealed a documented determination dated January 30, 2024. Based on the date of acceptance there was no documentation to demonstrate the paperwork was updated at least every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition. The determination should have been based on a resident's current examination and the facility's scope of services that the resident's needs could be met. R2 required directed care services. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged there was no other documentation of the required determinations available for review.”
2024-06-27Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Other facilities in Glendale.
Other memory care facilities near Glendale with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



