Arizona · Glendale

Apollo Residential Assisted Living.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 670-9326
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 30% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Glendale
A 10-bed Care Facility with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jun 2026
Last citation
Apr 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Apollo Residential Assisted Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Apollo Residential Assisted Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
48th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
61st%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

5 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D5
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2026-06-29
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Apollo Residential Assisted Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-04-24
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-113.A.2 · 3 findings
R9-10-113.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2

Based on record review and interview, the health care institution’s chief administrative officer failed to ensure training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) was provided annually to individuals employed to the health care institution, for two of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E1's, E2's, and E3's personnel record did not include documentation of initial and annual training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that E1's, E2’s, and E3’s records did not contain the training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB). E1 reported that he was not aware of the annual staff training for signs and symptoms of TB.

R9-10-818.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-818.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-818.A.2

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed that the Disaster Plan was last reviewed in 2023. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the Disaster plan was not reviewed at least once every 12 months.

R9-10-819.A.11A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.11
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.11

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility are maintained in labeled containers in a locked area separate from food preparation and storage, dining areas, and medications and are inaccessible to residents. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed a cabinet under the kitchen sink that contained poisonous and toxic materials. The lock on the cabinet did not prevent a resident from opening the cabinet which contained the following items: Cascade dish soap Can of Comet Bleach 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that poisonous or toxic materials were not stored in an area that was locked and inaccessible to residents.

2023-10-05
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in a bedroom. The deficient practice posed a risk if residents were unable to summon help from personnel members Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed no bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies in three resident bedrooms. 3. In an interview, E2 reported no bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in several resident's bedroom due to the residents having dementia. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E1 failed to ensure a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in a bedroom.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a disaster plan review conducted on August 10, 2020, and June 19, 2021. However, documentation of a disaster plan reviews in 2022 and 2023 were not available for review. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E1 failed to ensure the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.