Washington · University Place

The Cottages at University Place.

ALF · Memory Care60 bedsDementia-trained staff(253) 301-3817
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
DSHS SDCP
Peer rank
Top 23% of Washington memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · University Place
A 60-bed ALF · Memory Care with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
60
Last inspection
Jul 2024
Last citation
Jul 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 38 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.

Severity rank
57th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
73rd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

The Cottages at University Place has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Aug 2024as of Jul 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G2
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to The Cottages at University Place's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent inspection on July 1, 2024 resulted in 2 deficiencies — can you walk us through what those deficiencies were, and show us the corrective action plans the facility submitted to DSHS in response?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

One complaint was filed with DSHS during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and what steps did the facility take to address any issues identified in the complaint investigation?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The facility holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you explain what specific supports, programming, and staff training requirements that contract obligates you to maintain, and show us documentation of how those requirements are met?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

1
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2024-07-01
Annual Compliance Visit
Type A · 2 findings

Plain-language summary

During a routine inspection on May 20, 2024, the facility was cited for a deficiency under Washington Administrative Code for failing to ensure that three of five staff members had completed CPR or first-aid training that included hands-on skills demonstration as required by OSHA guidelines; the staff had instead completed computer-based trainings without the required demonstration component. This failure placed all 50 residents at risk of receiving emergency care from staff without proper training. The facility has committed to correcting this deficiency and implementing a monitoring system to ensure continued compliance.

Type AWAC §WAC 388-112A-0710
Verbatim citation text · WAC §WAC 388-112A-0710

The facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 staff (Staff C, E, and F) had taken a CPR or first-aid class that required hands-on demonstration of skills. Staff completed computer-based trainings that did not include skills demonstration, placing all 50 residents at risk during potential emergencies.

Type AWAC §WAC 388-112A-0720
Verbatim citation text · WAC §WAC 388-112A-0720

The facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 staff (Staff C and E) had valid CPR and first-aid cards or certificates within 30 days of their date of hire. Staff C was hired on 02/20/2024 and Staff E on 04/18/2022, neither had first-aid cards on file, placing all 50 residents at risk.

Read raw inspector notes

WAC 388-112A-0710: The facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 staff (Staff C, E, and F) had taken a CPR or first-aid class that required hands-on demonstration of skills. Staff completed computer-based trainings that did not include skills demonstration, placing all 50 residents at risk during potential emergencies. WAC 388-112A-0720: The facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 staff (Staff C and E) had valid CPR and first-aid cards or certificates within 30 days of their date of hire. Staff C was hired on 02/20/2024 and Staff E on 04/18/2022, neither had first-aid cards on file, placing all 50 residents at risk.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Nearby

Other facilities in Pierce County.

Other memory care facilities in Pierce County with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.