SUN TERRACE PROSSER.
SUN TERRACE PROSSER is Ranked in the top 24% of Washington memory care with 3 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
SUN TERRACE PROSSER has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to SUN TERRACE PROSSER's record and state requirements.
Sun Terrace Prosser holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the specific dementia supports covered under that contract, and show us the written policies that describe how staff implement those supports daily?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection on September 1, 2024 found 2 deficiencies — can you share the corrective action plans the facility submitted to DSHS for those findings, and explain what changes were made to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show 1 complaint was filed against this facility — was that complaint substantiated, and if so, what remediation steps did Sun Terrace Prosser take in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I cannot write a summary because the document does not contain specific findings about what was investigated or what violations, if any, were found. To help families understand the inspection outcome, I would need details about the complaint allegation and the investigator's conclusions about whether any deficiencies were cited or substantiated.
“The facility failed both its initial Fire Marshal inspection and follow-up Fire Marshal reinspection, indicating a failure to maintain adequate fire safety compliance.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040(2): The facility failed both its initial Fire Marshal inspection and follow-up Fire Marshal reinspection, indicating a failure to maintain adequate fire safety compliance.
2024-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a full inspection conducted July 15–18, 2024, DSHS found that Sun Terrace Prosser failed to follow the laundry services specified in a resident's negotiated service agreement; staff continued to provide laundry assistance after the resident's family had instructed them to stop and arranged to handle laundry themselves, resulting in additional charges to the resident. The facility was cited for this deficiency and required to submit a correction plan within 10 days and complete corrections within 45 days.
“The facility failed to follow the laundry services agreed upon in the resident's negotiated service agreement. The facility continued to wash a resident's personal laundry despite being told to stop, resulting in additional charges to the resident.”
“The facility failed to notify the resident's representative of charges related to laundry services that were not part of the agreed-upon care plan.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to follow the laundry services agreed upon in the resident's negotiated service agreement. The facility continued to wash a resident's personal laundry despite being told to stop, resulting in additional charges to the resident. RCW 70.129.030(4)(b): The facility failed to notify the resident's representative of charges related to laundry services that were not part of the agreed-upon care plan.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.