Riverside Place.
Riverside Place is Ranked in the top 38% of Washington memory care with 3 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Sep 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 38 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Riverside Place has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Riverside Place's record and state requirements.
Riverside Place holds a Washington DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that supports that designation, and explain how it differs from the standard assisted living services offered here?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS conducted an inspection on September 1, 2025, and cited 3 deficiencies — can you walk us through each deficiency, explain what corrective actions were taken, and show us the documentation you submitted to DSHS to close those findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and if so, what specific changes did the facility make in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced follow-up inspection on July 29, 2025, inspectors found that a medication aide employed by Riverside Place administered delegated nursing tasks to three memory care residents on 12 separate days without proper nurse delegation authorization from the facility's registered nurse. The facility's delegation records did not list this staff member as authorized to perform medication administration for any of the residents, and the delegating nurse confirmed during interview that the staff member lacked required documentation and had not been properly delegated to perform these tasks. This violation of Washington's nurse delegation requirements was cited as a deficiency.
“Staff C was administered medications to three residents (R1, R2, R3) for delegated nursing tasks on 12 of 28 days despite not being listed on their delegation assessments and not having required documentation for delegation by the RN. This represents unauthorized medication administration by non-delegated staff.”
“The facility failed to provide care agreed upon in the negotiated service agreement for Resident 3, who required showers on Tuesday and Saturday mornings but only received showers on two Wednesdays during the review period, with no evidence of attempts to provide the second weekly shower.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2050: Staff C was administered medications to three residents (R1, R2, R3) for delegated nursing tasks on 12 of 28 days despite not being listed on their delegation assessments and not having required documentation for delegation by the RN. This represents unauthorized medication administration by non-delegated staff. WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to provide care agreed upon in the negotiated service agreement for Resident 3, who required showers on Tuesday and Saturday mornings but only received showers on two Wednesdays during the review period, with no evidence of attempts to provide the second weekly shower. WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to provide care agreed upon in the negotiated service agreement for Resident 7. The NSA incorrectly listed medication services as self-assisted when staff actually administered crushed medications to the resident twice daily, creating a discrepancy between documented services and actual care provided.
2024-08-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough detail in this document to write an accurate summary. The form shows a complaint investigation occurred, but the narrative section is blank and the outcome is marked "N/A," making it unclear whether a violation was found or substantiated. To provide families with reliable information about this facility's inspection results, I would need the actual findings from the investigation report.
“Facility delayed reporting 2 of 2 incidents reviewed to CRU (Complaint Resolution Unit), failing to meet timely reporting requirements.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2630: Facility delayed reporting 2 of 2 incidents reviewed to CRU (Complaint Resolution Unit), failing to meet timely reporting requirements.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Grays Harbor County.
Other memory care facilities in Grays Harbor County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience