Channel Point Village.
Channel Point Village is Ranked in the top 33% of Washington memory care with 5 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jan 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Channel Point Village has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Channel Point Village's record and state requirements.
Channel Point Village holds a Washington DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that describes how staff are trained to support residents with memory loss, and confirm which policies are specific to the contract requirements?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show four deficiencies across four inspection reports, with the most recent inspection dated January 1, 2026 — can you walk us through the corrective action plans submitted to DSHS for those deficiencies and show documentation that each deficiency has been resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Three complaints were filed with DSHS during the inspection period on record — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what changes did the facility make in response to the findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-01-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine unannounced inspection on December 16–19, 2025 found that Channel Point Village's hot water in the memory care unit exceeded the safe maximum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit in five areas (dining room, three resident bathrooms, and a public shower), with temperatures reaching as high as 122.6 degrees, creating a risk of skin burns for residents and staff. The facility did not implement an immediate safety plan to protect residents while the problem was being addressed, and staff responsible for temperature monitoring were not properly trained on the requirements. The facility was cited for this deficiency and required to submit a plan of correction.
“The facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit in 5 areas (Memory Care Unit dining room, Resident 1, 2, and 11's sinks, and Memory Care Unit public shower/bathroom). Measured temperatures ranged from 120.5°F to 122.6°F, creating a risk of skin burns to residents and staff.”
“The facility failed to complete and document a preadmission assessment for Resident 3 upon their readmission to the facility. This placed the resident at risk for improper placement and unmet care needs.”
“The facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and well-maintained environment in 3 areas (Kitchen, second floor ledge, and Resident 10's room) and failed to keep exterior grounds and equipment in good repair. These conditions placed residents at direct risk and diminished quality of life.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2950: The facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit in 5 areas (Memory Care Unit dining room, Resident 1, 2, and 11's sinks, and Memory Care Unit public shower/bathroom). Measured temperatures ranged from 120.5°F to 122.6°F, creating a risk of skin burns to residents and staff. WAC 388-78A-2070: The facility failed to complete and document a preadmission assessment for Resident 3 upon their readmission to the facility. This placed the resident at risk for improper placement and unmet care needs. WAC 388-78A-3090: The facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and well-maintained environment in 3 areas (Kitchen, second floor ledge, and Resident 10's room) and failed to keep exterior grounds and equipment in good repair. These conditions placed residents at direct risk and diminished quality of life.
2024-12-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed to ensure staff members removed Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) prior to exiting residents' rooms to prevent the spread of infection.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to ensure staff members removed Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) prior to exiting residents' rooms to prevent the spread of infection.
2024-05-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“One staff member failed to have three positive reference checks completed as required in personnel files.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: One staff member failed to have three positive reference checks completed as required in personnel files.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Grays Harbor County.
Other memory care facilities in Grays Harbor County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience