Vineyard Park of Bremerton.
Vineyard Park of Bremerton is Ranked in the bottom 14% on citation severity among Washington peers with 7 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Aug 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Vineyard Park of Bremerton has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Vineyard Park of Bremerton's record and state requirements.
The most recent DSHS inspection on November 1, 2024 found 4 deficiencies across 4 inspection reports — can you walk us through the corrective action plans you submitted for those findings and show documentation that each deficiency was resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Three complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the inspection period on file — can you tell us whether any of those complaints were substantiated, and if so, what changes the facility made in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of your written dementia care program and explain how staff competency in memory care is verified for all shifts?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-08-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Vineyard Park of Bremerton, conducted between September and November 2024, found that the facility discharged a resident without proper written notice and failed to ensure the resident received all necessary medications, including regular pain medications, before leaving. The resident had to return to the facility the next day to retrieve narcotic medications that were not provided at discharge. Citations were issued for violations of discharge notification and safe discharge preparation requirements.
“The facility failed to notify the resident of the discharge in writing and in a language and manner understood by the resident, and failed to provide the effective date of discharge. The resident was unaware of the discharge date and the discharge notice contained an incorrect address.”
“The facility failed to notify the resident of the discharge in writing and in a language and manner understood by the resident, and failed to provide the effective date of discharge.”
“The facility failed to provide sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2660(1): The facility failed to notify the resident of the discharge in writing and in a language and manner understood by the resident, and failed to provide the effective date of discharge. The resident was unaware of the discharge date and the discharge notice contained an incorrect address. RCW 74.129.110(3)(b)(5)(b): The facility failed to notify the resident of the discharge in writing and in a language and manner understood by the resident, and failed to provide the effective date of discharge. WAC 388-78A-2660(1): The facility failed to provide sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility. The resident was discharged without all ordered medications, including as-needed narcotic medications for chronic pain, requiring the resident to retrieve medications from the facility the following morning. RCW 74.129.110(6): The facility failed to provide sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility.
2025-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Vineyard Park of Bremerton in November 2024 found that the facility interfered with Long-Term Care Ombudsmen's ability to advocate for residents, including accusing them of abuse and making statements that intimidated ombuds staff members. The facility violated state law requiring that ombudsmen have unimpeded access to residents and protection from retaliation or interference in carrying out their advocacy duties. This citation affects the facility's compliance with state licensing requirements.
“The facility failed to comply with licensee responsibilities by interfering with three Long-Term Care Ombudsmen's ability to complete their duties as resident advocates. The management company's CEO sent intimidating emails accusing ombudsmen of elder abuse and illegal activism, causing distress to ombudsmen and impacting their ability to advocate for residents, which placed all 94 residents at risk for infringement of their rights.”
“The facility interfered with the State Ombudsman's access to residents and retaliated against ombudsmen by accusing them of elder abuse and illegal activism, violating the prohibition against discriminatory, disciplinary, or retaliatory action against ombudsmen carrying out their duties.”
“The facility management company failed to report suspected abuse to the department's Complaint Resolution Unit hotline as required when dealing with allegations and concerns raised during interactions with residents and ombudsmen.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2730: The facility failed to comply with licensee responsibilities by interfering with three Long-Term Care Ombudsmen's ability to complete their duties as resident advocates. The management company's CEO sent intimidating emails accusing ombudsmen of elder abuse and illegal activism, causing distress to ombudsmen and impacting their ability to advocate for residents, which placed all 94 residents at risk for infringement of their rights. RCW 70.129.090 / WAC 365-18-120: The facility interfered with the State Ombudsman's access to residents and retaliated against ombudsmen by accusing them of elder abuse and illegal activism, violating the prohibition against discriminatory, disciplinary, or retaliatory action against ombudsmen carrying out their duties. WAC 388-78A-2630: The facility management company failed to report suspected abuse to the department's Complaint Resolution Unit hotline as required when dealing with allegations and concerns raised during interactions with residents and ombudsmen.
2024-11-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-08-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation of Vineyard Park of Bremerton conducted on May 23, 2024 found that the facility failed to comply with fire safety requirements, including not rectifying violations noted by the State Fire Marshal during inspections on December 19, 2023, February 6, 2024, and May 8, 2024, and not providing documentation of required inspections for the fire sprinkler system, kitchen fire suppression system, and carbon monoxide detectors. The facility also had linen storage shelving within three feet of an electrical panel, which raised fire code concerns. A deficiency citation was written under Washington's assisted living facility regulations requiring compliance with all applicable state and local codes.
“Facility remained out of compliance with Fire Marshal inspections after two follow-up inspections. Multiple deficiencies were found including: clothing stored within three feet of electrical panel in linen closet, lack of documentation for fire sprinkler system inspection, lack of documentation for kitchen fire suppression system inspection, and lack of documentation for carbon monoxide detector inspection.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040-1: Facility remained out of compliance with Fire Marshal inspections after two follow-up inspections. Multiple deficiencies were found including: clothing stored within three feet of electrical panel in linen closet, lack of documentation for fire sprinkler system inspection, lack of documentation for kitchen fire suppression system inspection, and lack of documentation for carbon monoxide detector inspection.
Other facilities in Kitsap County.
Other memory care facilities in Kitsap County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.