Primrose of Washington.
Primrose of Washington is Ranked in the top 33% of Utah memory care with 3 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Feb 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 35 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Primrose of Washington has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
9 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-02-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-01-30Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-19Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-11-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-10-28Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-09-23Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-08-28Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found in noncompliance with R380-80-4(1) for failure to protect a resident from neglect. One resident was not protected from neglect and died en route to the hospital. The facility failed to meet the requirement to protect each resident from neglect.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not protecting each resident from neglect. During the inspection, 1 resident was not protected from neglect and died en route to the hospital.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-80-4(1)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not protecting each resident from neglect. During the inspection, 1 resident was not protected from neglect and died en route to the hospital.
2024-03-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-01-09Complaint InvestigationSerious · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During this inspection, the facility was found to have noncompliance in two areas. First, one resident receiving hospice services did not have a physician's diagnosis and plan of care on file, and two hospice residents lacking the ability to evacuate independently did not have emergency evacuation plans developed. Second, hot water temperatures at five sinks near the private dining room measured between 123 and 125.6 degrees Fahrenheit, exceeding the required maximum of 120 degrees.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the licensee kept a copy of the physician's diagnosis and plan of care for a resident who received hospice services and did not develop an emergency evacuation plan for two residents who received hospice services and required more than limited assistance to evacuate the facility in the case of an emergency. During the inspection, 1 resident did not have hospice orders on file and 2 residents did not have an emergency evacuation plan developed.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring hot water temperatures delivered to public and resident care areas were maintained between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, hot water temperatures at 5 of the sinks located next to the private dining room were between 123 and 125.6 degrees Fahrenheit.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-11(10)(a)-(c)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the licensee kept a copy of the physician's diagnosis and plan of care for a resident who received hospice services and did not develop an emergency evacuation plan for two residents who received hospice services and required more than limited assistance to evacuate the facility in the case of an emergency. During the inspection, 1 resident did not have hospice orders on file and 2 residents did not have an emergency evacuation plan developed. [R432-270-25(5)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring hot water temperatures delivered to public and resident care areas were maintained between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, hot water temperatures at 5 of the sinks located next to the private dining room were between 123 and 125.6 degrees Fahrenheit.
Other facilities in Washington.
Other memory care facilities near Washington with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience