Autumn Park Assisted Living.
Autumn Park Assisted Living is Ranked in the bottom 46% of Utah memory care with 7 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Autumn Park Assisted Living has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-07Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-06-02Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 4 findings
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with four separate regulations, all of which had been cited previously in April 2025. Noncompliances included: cleaning agents and bleaches stored in unlocked cabinets in the laundry room and dining area rather than in a locked area; two direct care employees not wearing required name badges; two employees lacking completion of required annual training in multiple subject areas; and an emergency response plan missing critical information about personnel assignments, recruitment of additional resources, delivery of services under reduced staffing, and other emergency procedures. All four violations represent repeated findings from the prior inspection visit.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with this R432-270-23(5) by not ensuring that cleaning agents and bleaches were stored in a locked area to prevent unauthorized access. During the inspection, multiple chemicals with warning labels were found in the laundry room cabinet and the cabinet under the sink in the dining area. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025.”
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-1-4(1)(a) by not ensuring employees who provided direct care to residents were wearing name badges. During the inspection, 2 direct care employees were not observed to be wearing a name badge. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025.”
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-9(9)(c)(e)(g)(h)(i)(k)(l) by not ensuring employees were trained. During the inspection, 2 employee’s annual in-services were reviewed. They did not receive all the required in-services. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025.”
“The Licensee was out of compliance with this R432-270-26(6)(e)(g)(h)(i)(j) by not ensuring that the emergency and disaster response plan addressed the following: assignment of personnel to specific tasks during an emergency; instructions on how to recruit additional help, supplies, and equipment to meet the residents' needs after an emergency or disaster; delivery of essential care and services to facility occupants by alternate means; delivery of essential care and services if additional persons are housed in the facility during an emergency and delivery of essential care and services to facility occupants if personnel are reduced by an emergency. During the inspection, the emergency and response plan did not include the aforementioned information. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-23(5)] The Licensee was out of compliance with this R432-270-23(5) by not ensuring that cleaning agents and bleaches were stored in a locked area to prevent unauthorized access. During the inspection, multiple chemicals with warning labels were found in the laundry room cabinet and the cabinet under the sink in the dining area. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025. [R432-1-4(1)(a)-(b)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-1-4(1)(a) by not ensuring employees who provided direct care to residents were wearing name badges. During the inspection, 2 direct care employees were not observed to be wearing a name badge. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025. [R432-270-9(9)(a)-(l)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-9(9)(c)(e)(g)(h)(i)(k)(l) by not ensuring employees were trained. During the inspection, 2 employee’s annual in-services were reviewed. They did not receive all the required in-services. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025. [R432-270-26(6)(a)-(j)] The Licensee was out of compliance with this R432-270-26(6)(e)(g)(h)(i)(j) by not ensuring that the emergency and disaster response plan addressed the following: assignment of personnel to specific tasks during an emergency; instructions on how to recruit additional help, supplies, and equipment to meet the residents' needs after an emergency or disaster; delivery of essential care and services to facility occupants by alternate means; delivery of essential care and services if additional persons are housed in the facility during an emergency and delivery of essential care and services to facility occupants if personnel are reduced by an emergency. During the inspection, the emergency and response plan did not include the aforementioned information. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 22, 2025.
2025-04-22Annual Compliance VisitModerate · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with hot water temperature requirements because water in two hand sinks exceeded the allowed maximum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, reading 124.7 degrees in the dining room sink and 121.5 degrees in a resident restroom sink. The facility is required to maintain hot water temperatures between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit to prevent scalding injuries.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(5) by not ensuring hot water temperatures were maintained between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the water temperature in the hand sink in the public dining room and the hand sink in a residents restroom was checked. They read 124.7 degrees Fahrenheit and 121.5 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-25(5)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(5) by not ensuring hot water temperatures were maintained between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the water temperature in the hand sink in the public dining room and the hand sink in a residents restroom was checked. They read 124.7 degrees Fahrenheit and 121.5 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively.
2024-10-28Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-08-28Complaint InvestigationSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection, the facility was found to not have qualified staff present 24 hours a day to meet residents' needs as required by state rule, with inspectors directly observing an absence of staff during the visit. This same violation had been cited previously on July 10, 2024, indicating the facility had not corrected the deficiency. The facility was cited for noncompliance with staffing requirements.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that qualified direct-care personnel were on the premises 24 hours a day to meet residents' needs as determined by the residents' assessment and service plans. During the inspection, the licensor observed the assisted living unit did not have a staff present 24 hours a day to meet the resident's needs.<br/><br/>This noncompliance was previously cited on 7/10/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-9(1)(a)-(e)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that qualified direct-care personnel were on the premises 24 hours a day to meet residents' needs as determined by the residents' assessment and service plans. During the inspection, the licensor observed the assisted living unit did not have a staff present 24 hours a day to meet the resident's needs.<br/><br/>This noncompliance was previously cited on 7/10/2024.
2024-07-10Complaint InvestigationSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an inspection, the facility was found to be out of compliance with staffing requirements because qualified direct-care personnel were not present on the premises 24 hours a day to meet residents' needs as specified in their individual service plans. The inspector observed that the assisted living unit did not have staff available around the clock during the inspection visit. This violation relates to Rule R432-270-9(1)(a)-(e).
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that qualified direct-care personnel were on the premises 24 hours a day to meet residents' needs as determined by the residents' assessment and service plans. During the inspection, the licensor observed the assisted living unit did not have staff present 24 hours a day to meet the resident's needs.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-9(1)(a)-(e)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that qualified direct-care personnel were on the premises 24 hours a day to meet residents' needs as determined by the residents' assessment and service plans. During the inspection, the licensor observed the assisted living unit did not have staff present 24 hours a day to meet the resident's needs.
Other facilities in Washington.
Other memory care facilities near Washington with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience