Utah · Orem

Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care.

Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care is Ranked in the top 43% of Utah memory care with 6 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Apr 2025.

Care Facility32 licensed beds · mediumDementia-trained staff
92 South 800 East · Orem, UT 84097
Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care
Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care — photo 2
Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care — photo 3
Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care — photo 4
© Google · Rocky Mountain Care- Spring Hollow, Jason Gatherum
Facility · Orem
A 32-bed Care Facility with 6 citations on file — most recent Mar 2025. Ranks in the 57th percentile among state peers.
Last inspection · Apr 2025 · cleanSource · DLBC
Licensed beds
32
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Apr 2025
Last citation
Mar 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.

Severity rank
32nd
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
39th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

14weighted score · 24 mo
0–100 scale · lower = better · peer median 10
Last citation: MAR 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
MAR 2025
Jun 2024as of May 2026

Finding distribution

6 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A2
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every DLBC visit, verbatim.

8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

8
reports on file
6
total deficiencies
2025-04-28
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2025-03-20
Complaint Investigation
Moderate · 4 findings

Plain-language summary

During this routine inspection, the facility was found in noncompliance with multiple regulations related to resident protection and reporting requirements. Inspectors reviewed employee files and found facility corrective action forms documenting allegations of mistreatment and neglect by staff members from November 2024 and January 2025, but discovered that these incidents were not reported to Adult Protective Services as required, were not submitted as critical incidents to the state within one business day, and lacked documented corrective actions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure quarterly review of 21 incident reports by the Administrator and was found to have one resident subjected to physical restraint.

ModerateR380-80-4(1)
Verbatim citation text · R380-80-4(1)

The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from mistreatment. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident.

ModerateR432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)Repeat
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)

The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected abuse in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. There was no documentation indicating that the incident was reported to Adult Protective Services.

ModerateR380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)
Verbatim citation text · R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)

The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in a format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system.

ModerateR432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)

The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(5)(c) by not ensuring that residents were free of chemical and physical restraint. During the inspection, 1 resident was not protected from physical restraint.

Read raw inspector notes

[R380-80-4(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from mistreatment. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. [R380-80-4(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from neglect. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated January 14, 2025, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful. [R380-80-4(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from neglect. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which included allegations of the employee being neglectful. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected abuse in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. There was no documentation indicating that the incident was reported to Adult Protective Services. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated January 14, 2025, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful, which had not been reported in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful, and was not reported in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(g) by not ensuring that the Administrator reviewed at least quarterly every injury, accident, and incident to a resident or employee and they did not document appropriate corrective action. During the inspection, 21 incident reports were reviewed and an appropriate corrective action was not included. [R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in a format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system. [R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated January 14, 2025, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system. [R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system. The licensee did not submit a report of a critical incident to the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. [R432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(5)(c) by not ensuring that residents were free of chemical and physical restraint. During the inspection, 1 resident was not protected from physical restraint.

2024-12-19
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2024-12-02
Annual Compliance Visit
Standard · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During the annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with emergency preparedness requirements because it did not have emergency heating equipment and an emergency radio on-site. This same violation was previously cited on August 7, 2024 and October 8, 2024, indicating the facility has not corrected the deficiency across multiple inspection cycles.

StandardR432-270-26(10)(a)-(g)
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-26(10)(a)-(g)

The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the provider had in-house equipment and supplies required in an emergency including: emergency heating equipment and an emergency radio. During the inspection, the aforementioned items were not supplied in-house. This non-compliance was previously cited on 8/7/2024 and 10/8/2024.

Read raw inspector notes

[R432-270-26(10)(a)-(g)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the provider had in-house equipment and supplies required in an emergency including: emergency heating equipment and an emergency radio. During the inspection, the aforementioned items were not supplied in-house. This non-compliance was previously cited on 8/7/2024 and 10/8/2024.

2024-11-27
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2024-10-08
Annual Compliance Visit
Standard · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During an annual inspection, the facility was found to lack a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care on file for one hospice resident, in violation of state licensing rules. This same noncompliance had been cited twice before, on January 29, 2024 and August 7, 2024, indicating the facility had not corrected the issue from prior inspections.

StandardR432-270-11(10)(a)-(c)
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-11(10)(a)-(c)

The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not retaining a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care for all hospice residents. During the inspection, 1 hospice resident did not have a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care on file. This noncompliance was previously cited on 1/29/2024 and 8/7/2024.

Read raw inspector notes

[R432-270-11(10)(a)-(c)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not retaining a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care for all hospice residents. During the inspection, 1 hospice resident did not have a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care on file. This noncompliance was previously cited on 1/29/2024 and 8/7/2024.

2024-08-07
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2024-06-11
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Nearby

Other facilities in Orem.

Other memory care facilities near Orem with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.