Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care.
Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care is Ranked in the top 43% of Utah memory care with 6 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Apr 2025.




A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Rocky Mountain Care - Spring Hollow Assisted Living and Memory Care has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-04-28Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-03-20Complaint InvestigationModerate · 4 findings
Plain-language summary
During this routine inspection, the facility was found in noncompliance with multiple regulations related to resident protection and reporting requirements. Inspectors reviewed employee files and found facility corrective action forms documenting allegations of mistreatment and neglect by staff members from November 2024 and January 2025, but discovered that these incidents were not reported to Adult Protective Services as required, were not submitted as critical incidents to the state within one business day, and lacked documented corrective actions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure quarterly review of 21 incident reports by the Administrator and was found to have one resident subjected to physical restraint.
“The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from mistreatment. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident.”
“The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected abuse in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. There was no documentation indicating that the incident was reported to Adult Protective Services.”
“The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in a format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system.”
“The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(5)(c) by not ensuring that residents were free of chemical and physical restraint. During the inspection, 1 resident was not protected from physical restraint.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-80-4(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from mistreatment. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. [R380-80-4(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from neglect. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated January 14, 2025, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful. [R380-80-4(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from neglect. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which included allegations of the employee being neglectful. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected abuse in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. There was no documentation indicating that the incident was reported to Adult Protective Services. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated January 14, 2025, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful, which had not been reported in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(k) by not reporting any suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful, and was not reported in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. [R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(1)(g) by not ensuring that the Administrator reviewed at least quarterly every injury, accident, and incident to a resident or employee and they did not document appropriate corrective action. During the inspection, 21 incident reports were reviewed and an appropriate corrective action was not included. [R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in a format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee mistreating a resident. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system. [R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated January 14, 2025, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system. [R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not ensuring that the licensee submitted a report of critical incident to the office in format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee’s file and observed a facility corrective action form, dated November 18, 2024, which had allegations of the employee being neglectful. The corresponding critical incident was not found in the department’s system. The licensee did not submit a report of a critical incident to the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. [R432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(5)(c) by not ensuring that residents were free of chemical and physical restraint. During the inspection, 1 resident was not protected from physical restraint.
2024-12-19Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-02Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During the annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with emergency preparedness requirements because it did not have emergency heating equipment and an emergency radio on-site. This same violation was previously cited on August 7, 2024 and October 8, 2024, indicating the facility has not corrected the deficiency across multiple inspection cycles.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the provider had in-house equipment and supplies required in an emergency including: emergency heating equipment and an emergency radio. During the inspection, the aforementioned items were not supplied in-house. This non-compliance was previously cited on 8/7/2024 and 10/8/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-26(10)(a)-(g)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the provider had in-house equipment and supplies required in an emergency including: emergency heating equipment and an emergency radio. During the inspection, the aforementioned items were not supplied in-house. This non-compliance was previously cited on 8/7/2024 and 10/8/2024.
2024-11-27Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-10-08Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found to lack a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care on file for one hospice resident, in violation of state licensing rules. This same noncompliance had been cited twice before, on January 29, 2024 and August 7, 2024, indicating the facility had not corrected the issue from prior inspections.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not retaining a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care for all hospice residents. During the inspection, 1 hospice resident did not have a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care on file. This noncompliance was previously cited on 1/29/2024 and 8/7/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-11(10)(a)-(c)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not retaining a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care for all hospice residents. During the inspection, 1 hospice resident did not have a copy of the physician's diagnosis and orders for care on file. This noncompliance was previously cited on 1/29/2024 and 8/7/2024.
2024-08-07Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-06-11Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Orem.
Other memory care facilities near Orem with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

