Covington Senior Living.
Covington Senior Living is Ranked in the bottom 18% of Utah memory care with 8 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.




A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 38 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Covington Senior Living has 8 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
8 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
8 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
11 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-17Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-06-04Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During this annual inspection, inspectors found that the facility was not maintaining safe conditions in compliance with state rules, specifically noting that carbon dioxide tanks in the kitchen were unsecured and posed a safety hazard. This same maintenance issue had been cited previously during a relicensure inspection on March 31, 2025, and was not corrected. The facility was cited for noncompliance with the requirement to ensure facility spaces and grounds are safe and well-maintained.
“The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(1) by not ensuring that maintenance was conducted to ensure that the facility spaces and grounds were safe and in compliance with Rule R432-6. During the Inspection, an environmental tour of the kitchen was conducted and Co2 tanks were observed to be unsecured. This non-compliance was previously cited during the relicensure inspection, dated 3/31/2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-25(1)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(1) by not ensuring that maintenance was conducted to ensure that the facility spaces and grounds were safe and in compliance with Rule R432-6. During the Inspection, an environmental tour of the kitchen was conducted and Co2 tanks were observed to be unsecured. This non-compliance was previously cited during the relicensure inspection, dated 3/31/2025.
2025-03-31Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-30Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-04Complaint InvestigationModerate · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During this inspection, the facility was found to be out of compliance with medication administration rules, with two residents not receiving their medications as prescribed by their doctors. This same violation had been cited in previous inspections on February 14, 2024 and April 9, 2024, indicating the facility had not corrected the problem. Families should be aware that medication administration errors represent a significant safety issue in memory care settings.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing order. During the inspection, 2 residents did not receive their medication according to the prescribing order. <br/><br/>This noncompliance was previously written on the 2/14/2024 and 4/9/2024 inspections.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing order. During the inspection, 2 residents did not receive their medication according to the prescribing order. <br/><br/>This noncompliance was previously written on the 2/14/2024 and 4/9/2024 inspections.
2024-11-13Annual Compliance VisitModerate · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, inspectors reviewed critical incident reporting and found that the facility failed to report an incident that occurred on November 2, 2024 until November 11, 2024—nine days later instead of within one business day as required by state rule. This noncompliance with critical incident reporting requirements was cited.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During review of critical incidents it was identified that the incident occurred on 11/02/2024 and was not reported until 11/11/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During review of critical incidents it was identified that the incident occurred on 11/02/2024 and was not reported until 11/11/2024.
2024-08-05Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-05-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-04-09Annual Compliance VisitSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, noncompliance was cited for medication administration errors. Two residents were found not receiving their medications according to the prescribed orders. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as directed by the prescribing physician.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribed order. During the inspection, 2 residents were identified not to receive their medications according to the prescribed order.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribed order. During the inspection, 2 residents were identified not to receive their medications according to the prescribed order.
2024-02-14Complaint InvestigationSerious · 4 findings
Plain-language summary
During this routine inspection, the facility was found out of compliance in multiple areas: incident reports lacked documented corrective actions, a suspected neglect case was not properly investigated or reported as required, a hospice resident did not receive prescribed narcotic pain medication during end-of-life care, a resident's service plan was not updated after a significant change in condition, and staff failed to perform required two-hour wellness checks on a resident, leaving one resident without checks for approximately six and a half hours. These noncompliance findings indicate gaps in documentation, medication administration, care planning, and direct care oversight.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the administrator documented appropriate corrective action on incident reports quarterly, completed an investigation when there was reason to believe a resident had been subjected to neglect, and reported suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. During the inspection, 3 incident reports were reviewed and were not observed to contain documented appropriate corrective action. Additionally, a review of facility neglect investigations was conducted and identified that the administrator failed to document a complete investigation and failed to report the suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribed order. During the inspection, 1 hospice resident was not administered narcotic pain medication, according to the prescribed order, to assist with the alleviation of pain during the dying process.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the resident's service plan was updated to reflect a significant change in condition. During the inspection, 1 resident had a significant change in condition and the service plan was not updated to reflect those changes.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring staff performed services in accordance with a resident's written service plan. During the inspection, staff were not observed to have performed services in accordance with 1 resident's written service plan, which included safety and wellness checks every two (2) hours. One (1) resident was not provided wellness checks for approximately 6 1/2 hours.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the administrator documented appropriate corrective action on incident reports quarterly, completed an investigation when there was reason to believe a resident had been subjected to neglect, and reported suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. During the inspection, 3 incident reports were reviewed and were not observed to contain documented appropriate corrective action. Additionally, a review of facility neglect investigations was conducted and identified that the administrator failed to document a complete investigation and failed to report the suspected neglect in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. [R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribed order. During the inspection, 1 hospice resident was not administered narcotic pain medication, according to the prescribed order, to assist with the alleviation of pain during the dying process. [R432-270-13(5)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the resident's service plan was updated to reflect a significant change in condition. During the inspection, 1 resident had a significant change in condition and the service plan was not updated to reflect those changes. [R432-270-9(2)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring staff performed services in accordance with a resident's written service plan. During the inspection, staff were not observed to have performed services in accordance with 1 resident's written service plan, which included safety and wellness checks every two (2) hours. One (1) resident was not provided wellness checks for approximately 6 1/2 hours.
Other facilities in Orem.
Other memory care facilities near Orem with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

