Spring Gardens North Ogden.
Spring Gardens North Ogden is Ranked in the top 41% of Utah memory care with 4 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Aug 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 38 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Spring Gardens North Ogden has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-08-18Annual Compliance VisitSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found to be out of compliance with resident protection requirements because it failed to properly train staff on residents' rights to be free from abuse, neglect, and physical restraints. The inspector reviewed documentation of an alleged abuse incident that the facility had substantiated, along with the training records for the staff member involved, and determined the training was inadequate. The facility did not demonstrate that it had instructed staff to protect residents from mistreatment.
“The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not protecting all residents from mistreatment through acts or omissions and not instructing others to do the same. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed documentation of alleged abuse, that was substantiated by the licensee, as well as the corresponding trainings for the alleged perpetrator; and found that the facility failed to properly train the alleged perpetrator regarding all the residents rights to be free of abuse, neglect and physical restraints.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-80-5(4)] The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not protecting all residents from mistreatment through acts or omissions and not instructing others to do the same. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed documentation of alleged abuse, that was substantiated by the licensee, as well as the corresponding trainings for the alleged perpetrator; and found that the facility failed to properly train the alleged perpetrator regarding all the residents rights to be free of abuse, neglect and physical restraints.
2025-06-25Complaint InvestigationStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During this routine inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with assessment requirements: signed and dated resident assessments were not completed before admission as required, with three residents' assessments reviewed showing completion up to a month after they had already moved in. This was a repeat noncompliance, having been cited previously on April 28, 2025. Assessments completed after admission delay the facility's ability to establish individualized care plans based on each resident's needs from the start.
“The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-13(1) by not ensuring a signed and dated assessment was completed for each resident before admission. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed the assessments of three residents and observed that they were completed up to a month after admission.<br/><br/>This is a repeat noncompliance as noted on April 28, 2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-13(1)] The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-13(1) by not ensuring a signed and dated assessment was completed for each resident before admission. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed the assessments of three residents and observed that they were completed up to a month after admission.<br/><br/>This is a repeat noncompliance as noted on April 28, 2025.
2025-03-26Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During the annual inspection, noncompliance was cited under R432-35-3(3) because two newly hired employees were not entered into the Direct Access Clearance System within the required five working days of hire. This violation was a repeat of a prior noncompliance identified on February 20, 2025. The facility was required to correct the failure to timely register employees in the background clearance system.
“The licensee was out of compliance with R432-35-3(3) by not ensuring current employees were reflected in the Direct Access Clearance System within five working days of engagement. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed the new employee records and the Direct Access Clearance System and observed the two employees were reflected in the system after five working days. This was a repeat noncompliance as noted on 02/20/2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-35-3(3)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-35-3(3) by not ensuring current employees were reflected in the Direct Access Clearance System within five working days of engagement. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed the new employee records and the Direct Access Clearance System and observed the two employees were reflected in the system after five working days. This was a repeat noncompliance as noted on 02/20/2025.
2025-02-20Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During the annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with fingerprint submission requirements for staff background checks. One staff member's fingerprints were not submitted to the state system within the required 15 working days of being hired, and this was a repeat violation the facility had previously been cited for. The facility must ensure all new staff complete fingerprint clearance within the required timeframe going forward.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring all engaged covered individuals submitted fingerprints within 15 working days of engagement. During the inspection, the licensor observed in the Direct Access Clearance System that one individual did not have their fingerprints submitted within 15 working days of engagement. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-35-3(2)(a)-(b)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring all engaged covered individuals submitted fingerprints within 15 working days of engagement. During the inspection, the licensor observed in the Direct Access Clearance System that one individual did not have their fingerprints submitted within 15 working days of engagement. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
2024-12-24Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Ogden.
Other memory care facilities near Ogden with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience