Russellville Park Memory Care.
Russellville Park Memory Care is Grade C−, ranked in the bottom 48% of Oregon memory care with 8 OR DHS citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 81 Oregon facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Russellville Park Memory Care has 8 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
8 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
8 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Russellville Park Memory Care's record and state requirements.
Oregon DHS records show 14 inspection reports on file with 10 deficiencies — can you walk us through the most common themes in those deficiencies and show us the written corrective action plans the facility submitted to DHS?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection on July 31, 2025 is part of a record with 10 complaints on file — were any of those complaints substantiated by Oregon DHS, and what changes did the facility make in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This community holds an Oregon DHS Memory Care Endorsement — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that DHS reviewed for the endorsement, and explain how it differs from standard assisted living care?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every OR-DHS visit, verbatim.
10 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-10-11Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to report potential or suspected abuse as required by state law. This is a licensing violation under Oregon's residential care regulations. The facility's failure to make a timely report to the appropriate authorities meant that potential harm to a resident was not documented through proper channels.
“Failed to report potential or suspected abuse”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
2025-08-17Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to maintain a safe physical environment. No further details regarding the specific nature of the safety deficiency were provided in the inspection record.
“Failed to maintain a safe physical environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to maintain a safe physical environment
2025-08-11Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a safe environment. The investigation did not substantiate the complaint. No licensing violation was found.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2025-07-31Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-07-17Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a safe environment. No violation was found.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2025-01-08Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels as required by the Assisted Behavioral Support Team standards. No further details about the specific staffing deficit or its impact were documented in this summary.
“Failed to staff as indicated by ABST”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
2024-11-09Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to maintain staffing levels as required by the Adult and Senior Care Programs rules. The investigation substantiated the staffing violation based on records reviewed during the complaint inspection.
“Failed to staff as indicated by ABST”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
2024-05-21Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2023-12-07Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding failure to provide inservice training. No outcome was specified in the inspection record, so the status of this finding is unclear from the available information.
“Failed to provide inservice”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide inservice
2023-12-04Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan. No further details about the specific care plan deficiency or corrective actions are provided in the available information.
“Failed to follow care plan”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to follow care plan
4 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
4 older inspections (2022–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Multnomah County.
Other memory care facilities in Multnomah County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.