Norbella Senior Living Savage.
Norbella Senior Living Savage is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Be first to know if Norbella Senior Living Savage's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Norbella Senior Living Savage's record and state requirements.
Minnesota Department of Health conducted an inspection on July 7, 2025, and found zero deficiencies — can you walk us through the written dementia care policies that MDH reviewed during that visit, and provide a copy of those policies for our records?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statute chapter 144G — what specific dementia care training and competency assessments are required under that designation, and can you show documentation of staff completion dates?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
One complaint was filed with MDH during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the facility's written response or corrective action plan that addressed the complaint?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-07Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
Norbella Senior Living in Savage had a standard inspection on July 11, 2025, and was found in violation of fire protection and physical environment requirements under Minnesota statute 144G.45. The facility received a correction order and was assessed a $500 fine; the facility must document corrective actions taken and has the right to request reconsideration or a hearing within 15 days of receiving this notice.
Full inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement; Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Norbella Senior Living Savage August 28, 2025 Page 2 § 144G.20; Level 5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addtion to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment - $500.00 Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, t he total amount you are assessed is $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm REQUESTING A HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. Norbella Senior Living Savage August 28, 2025 Page 3 To submit a hearing request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm To appeal fines via reconsideration, please follow the procedure outlined above. P lease note that you may request a reconsideration o r a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jodi Johnson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jodi.Johnson@state.mn.us Telephone: 507-344-2730 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 AH PRINTED: 08/28/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 37850 07/11/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14275 JOPPA AVENUE NORBELLA SENIOR LIVING SAVAGE SAVAGE, MN 55378 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER(S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL37850016 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On July 7, 2025, through July 11, 2025, the STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF survey at the above provider and the following FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS correction orders are issued. At the time of the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. survey, there were 36 residents; 36 receiving services under the Assisted Living Facility with THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 775 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical 0 775 SS=F environment LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 GNR211 If continuation sheet 1 of 16 PRINTED: 08/28/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 37850 07/11/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14275 JOPPA AVENUE NORBELLA SENIOR LIVING SAVAGE SAVAGE, MN 55378 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 775 Continued From page 1 0 775 Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the current State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors.
2023-12-27Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that facility staff failed to perform life-saving measures such as the Heimlich maneuver or CPR when a resident choked and died during breakfast in December 2023. The Minnesota Department of Health investigated and determined the allegation was not substantiated, finding that staff appropriately called 911 immediately when the resident began choking, stayed with him, and followed facility protocol; emergency personnel arrived and initiated life-saving measures until locating a do-not-resuscitate order. The resident's death certificate listed the cause as choking and the manner as accidental.
Full inspector notes
Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation: The facility neglected a resident when staff failed to start life saving measures such as a Heimlich maneuver (choking first aid) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for the resident who was choking and died. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The facility tended to the resident during an episode when he coughed on food while eating and became unresponsive. Staff stayed with the resident and called 911 to request emergency services. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including nursing staff and unlicensed staff. The investigation included review of the resident’s facility record as well as other resident records that resided in the memory care. Facility incidents, policies, and protocols regarding resident change in status and emergency aid were reviewed. The investigator observed staff supervision of residents during dining services. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included Alzheimer’s dementia and high blood pressure. The resident’s service plan included assistance with all activities of living, medication management, housekeeping, and meal preparation. The most recent nursing assessment indicated the resident had been hospitalized and returned back to the facility with an order for a mechanical soft diet for difficulty chewing food. The resident required staff assistance during meals. One morning the resident began choking during breakfast and a staff member began patting his back. The staff member witnessed the resident’s face turn red and head slouched down and 911 was called. Staff wheeled the resident in his wheelchair to the nursing station to be with the resident while on the phone with 911. Emergency personnel arrived and started living saving measures until a do not resuscitate order was located. The facility staff members did not attempt a Heimlich maneuver or initiate CPR for the resident. The 911 audio indicated the staff member told dispatch the resident seemed to be choking, had coughed up some food and was in and out of consciousness and needed emergency assistance. The facility Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services & Amenities (UDALSA) indicated the facility does not require unlicensed staff to be CPR trained stating staff would call 911 and follow operator instructions. The same document indicated a registered nurse was onsite “full time” but did indicate unlicensed staff were in the building at all times. The facility policy titled “Resident Emergencies/911 Calls,” indicated staff were to call the nurse for any emergency or, if no nurse was immediately available onsite, to call 911 promptly. The same document indicated if any doubt about the seriousness of the resident’s condition existed to defer to the judgement of the first responder’s evaluation. During an interview, the staff member stated she knew it was an emergency situation, which warranted a call to 911. She stated the nurse was not in the building so the protocol is to call 911. During interview, the director of nursing confirmed staff member(s) acted appropriately without delay in care during the incident. During interview, a family member stated the police department notified her that her father had passed away. She stated there was concern that staff had done nothing, like the Heimlich maneuver, for him. The resident’s death certificate lists the immediate cause of death as choking (on food) and manner of death as an accident. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, he was deceased. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Not Applicable. Action taken by facility: None. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 12/28/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 37850 12/06/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14275 JOPPA AVENUE NORBELLA SENIOR LIVING SAVAGE SAVAGE, MN 55378 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On December 6, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL378505750C/#HL378508485M. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 S2UH11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
1 older inspection (2022–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Scott County.
Other memory care facilities in Scott County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.


