Autumn Grace Ii.
Autumn Grace Ii is Grade C−, ranked in the bottom 40% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Dec 2024.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 85 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Autumn Grace Ii has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Autumn Grace Ii's record and state requirements.
MDH records show 1 complaint on file and a recent inspection on December 20, 2024 — was that complaint substantiated, and can you walk us through any corrective actions or policy changes the facility made in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minn. Stat. ch. 144G with 16 licensed beds — can you share the written dementia care program and explain how it addresses the specific needs of residents with memory loss?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 2 inspections on file and 0 deficiencies cited by MDH, what documentation does Autumn Grace II maintain to demonstrate ongoing compliance with Minnesota's dementia care standards, and can families review those records during a tour?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2024-12-20Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A follow-up survey on July 22, 2025, found that the facility had not corrected three violations from a prior December 2024 inspection involving licensing requirements, prescription drug handling, and staff training, and also identified two additional violations related to medication documentation and care services. The Minnesota Department of Health assessed fines totaling $1,500.00 for these violations. The facility has the right to request reconsideration or a hearing within 15 days of receiving this order.
Full inspector notes
correction orders issued pursuant to the Decembe r23, 2024 survey. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1 Subd .4 (a), state correction orders issued pursuant to the last survey ,completed on Decembe r23, 2024, found not corrected at the time of the July 22, 2025, follow-up survey and/or subject to penalty assessmen at re as follows: 0100-License Required-144g.10 Subdivision 1 - $500.00 1890-Prescription Drugs-144g.71 Subd. 20 - $500.00 2140-Supervising Staff Training-144g.83 Subd. 3 - $500.00 The details of the violations noted at the time of this follow-up survey completed on July 22, 2025 (listed above), are on the attached State Form. Brackets around the ID Prefix Tag in the left hand column, e.g., {2 ----} will identify the uncorrected tags. Also, at the time of this follow-up survey completed on July 22, 2025, we identified the following violation(s): 1770-Documentation Of Medication Setup-144g.71 Subd. 9 2310-Appropriate Care And Services-144g.91 Subd. 4 (a) The details of the violation(s) noted at the time of this follow-up survey are delineated on the attached State Form. Only the ID Prefix Tag in the left hand column without brackets will identify these state correction orders. It is not necessar yto develop a plan of correction. Therefore ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the total amount you are assesse dis $1,500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject . to appeal An equal opportunity employer . Letter ID: 8GKP Revised 04/14/2023 Autumn Grace II October 17, 2025 Page 2 DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 0, Subd .5(c), t he licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Leve l1: no fines or enforcement; Leve l2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0. CORRECTIO ONRDER RECONSIDERATI OPRNOCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 2, Subd .2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope ,and any fine assesse dthrough the correction order reconsideration process .The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm REQUESTIN AG HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assesse da fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuan tto Minn. Stat. § 144G2. 0, Subd .14 and Subd .18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm To appea lfines via reconsideration ,please follow the procedure outlined above. Please note that you may request a reconsideration or a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at Autumn Grace II October 17, 2025 Page 3 the website listed above. INFORMA LCONFERENCE In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144A.475, Subd .8 OR Minn. Stat. § 144G2. 0, Subd .20, the Commissione or f Health is authorized to hold a conference to exchange information, clarify issues ,or resolve issues .The Department of Health staff would like to schedule a conference call with Autumn Grace II. Please contact odi Johnson at 507-344-2730 on or before Wednesday ,October 22,2025, to schedule the conference call. We urge you to review these orders carefully. If you have questions ,please contact Jod iJohnson at You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and/or state form with your organizations’ Governing Body. Sincerely, Jod iJohnson ,Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jodi.Johnson@state.mn.us Telephone :507-344-2730 Fax :1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 10/17/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 23858 07/22/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 110 RAVEN COURT AUTUMN GRACE II MANKATO, MN 56001 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 000} Initial Comments {0 000} ******ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER FOLLOW UP using federal software. Tag numbers have SURVEY WITH RE-ISSUE OF ORDERS been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The INITIAL COMMENTS assigned tag number appears in the SL23858016-1 far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state Statute number and the On July 21, 2025, through July 22, 2025, the corresponding text of the state Statute out follow-up survey at the above provider to Statement of Deficiencies" column. This follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey column also includes the findings which completed on December 23, 2024. At the time of are in violation of the state requirement the survey, there were thirteen (13) residents after the statement, "This Minnesota receiving services under the Assisted Living requirement is not met as evidenced by." Facility with Dementia Care license. As a result Following the evaluators ' findings is the of the follow-up survey, the following orders were Time Period for Correction. reissued and/or issued. PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. {0 100} 144G.10 Subdivision 1 License required {0 100} SS=F LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 2QH012 If continuation sheet 1 of 18 PRINTED: 10/17/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 23858 07/22/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 110 RAVEN COURT AUTUMN GRACE II MANKATO, MN 56001 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 100} Continued From page 1 {0 100} (a)(1) Beginning August 1, 2021, no assisted living facility may operate in Minnesota unless it is licensed under this chapter. (2) No facility or building on a campus may provide assisted living services until obtaining the required license under paragraphs (c) to (e). (b) The licensee is legally responsible for the management, control, and operation of the facility, regardless of the existence of a management agreement or subcontract. Nothing in this chapter shall in any way affect the rights and remedies available under other law. (c) Upon approving an application for an assisted living facility license, the commissioner shall issue a single license for each building that is operated by the licensee as an assisted living facility and is located at a separate address, except as provided under paragraph (d) or (e).
2024-01-30Complaint Investigation1 · Substantiated Finding
Plain-language summary
MDH investigated a complaint and substantiated that an unlicensed caregiver financially exploited a resident by using the resident's debit card information saved on her phone to make unauthorized purchases totaling approximately $680 from vendors including Amazon, Shein, and Temu from February through May, and by accepting $200 in cash from the resident that was never repaid. The caregiver initially claimed the card use was accidental but text messages showed she had solicited the $200 cash from the resident and suggested the resident lie about offering it. The caregiver admitted to the unauthorized card use during the investigation and promised repayment, but the resident was never reimbursed.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Full inspector notes
Finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility Nature of the Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) financially exploited a resident by using the resident’s credit card to purchase personal items from February to May and also requested $200 in cash from the resident. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP, who was an unlicensed caregiver, was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP used the resident’s saved credit card information on her phone to make personal purchases totaling approximately $680 from vendors such as Amazon. Additionally, the AP accepted $200 in cash from the resident. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted the resident. The investigation included review of resident's records, the AP’s personnel record, facility's policies and procedures, and incident An equal opportunity employer. reports. The investigation included an onsite visit, observations, and interactions between residents and facility staff. The resident resided in an assisted living unit. The resident’s diagnoses included diabetes and history of traumatic brain injury. The resident’s service plan included assistance with showers and medication administration. An internal facility investigation indicated the resident asked a staff member to help her figure out some unexplained charges to her account. The same documents indicated it was determined the charges were made by the AP using the resident’s debit card. When the matter was discussed with the AP, she stated she had helped the resident with a purchase using her personal phone and did not realize the card information remained there. The AP later provided a list of purchases which she said were made on behalf of the resident and other purchases which were for the AP made in error. The document indicated the AP claimed she apologized to the resident, offered to pay her back, and acknowledged she should not take gifts that are offered by residents. During the investigation text messages were obtained shared between the AP and the resident regarding a separate transaction between them. These texts indicated the AP wrote she needed to “figure out how I’m gonna get” $200. The resident replied she could cover the $200 but needed a way to get the money. Later in the exchange the AP offered to take the resident to a location where the money could be withdrawn. During the same exchange, the AP wrote “this is between [you] and I right.” The texts indicated the AP suggested the resident could say she offered the AP money, but the AP did not take it. This text ended with “idk [I don’t’ know] hate for u [you] to lie.” During an interview, the resident stated she the AP's assistance in ordering a book and provided her debit card information for the transaction. Later when the resident received her bank statement, the resident discovered unauthorized purchases, including clothing, movie theater expenses, and fast food, totaling around $680. The resident recalled the AP coming to her in tears, claimed she did not know about using her card, and insisted it was accidental. The AP promised to repay the amount but did not. In another instance, the AP asked to borrow $200, and the resident gave her $200 cash, which was also not repaid. During an interview, the AP admitted using the resident's debit card without authorization. According to her, the resident had asked her to make an Amazon purchase, and unknowingly, the AP ended up using the resident's card, which was saved on her Google account. She remained unaware of the error until the resident brought it to her attention. The AP claimed to have immediately communicated with the resident, expressing her intention to reimburse the amount. However, the resident told her she did not have to repay. The AP could not recall the exact amount charged on the debit card. The AP stated she mentioned financial issues to the resident and the resident offered the money without her asking for it. She stated the resident gave her the money voluntarily. During an interview, the staff member stated the resident presented her with bank statements displaying unfamiliar charges. Upon calling the Amazon number listed on the statements, they discovered the purchases were made by the AP. The unauthorized purchases totaled more than $600 from vendors such as Shein, Temu, Door Dash, and Amazon. When the staff member reached out to the AP, she asserted it was accidental and promised to reimburse the resident. Later, the resident told the staff member the AP had not paid her back, plus the AP had taken an additional $200 from the resident. The staff member promptly reported the situation to the manager. During an interview, the management staff stated the staff member assisted the resident in contacting Amazon about unauthorized purchases, and it was revealed the purchases were made by the AP. A staff member brought it up to the AP and who admitted to accidentally saving the resident's card in her phone and making the purchases without the resident's knowledge. The AP apologized and promised to repay, but the money was never returned. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. Substantiated: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 19. “Substantiated” means a preponderance of evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred. Financial exploitation: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 9 "Financial exploitation" means: (b) In the absence of legal authority a person: (1) willfully uses, withholds, or disposes of funds or property of a vulnerable adult; (2) obtains for the actor or another the performance of services by a third person for the wrongful profit or advantage of the actor or another to the detriment of the vulnerable adult; (3) acquires possession or control of, or an interest in, funds or property of a vulnerable adult through the use of undue influence, harassment, duress, deception, or fraud; or (4) forces, compels, coerces, or entices a vulnerable adult against the vulnerable adult's will to perform services for the profit or advantage of another. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: Yes. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: NA. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes. Action taken by facility: The facility initiated an internal investigation and the AP’s employment was terminated. In addition to reporting this to MDH, the facility contacted law enforcement. The facility provided education regarding this matter to its staff members. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult’s right to be free from maltreatment. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email. The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. If the maltreatment is substantiated against an identified employee, this report will be submitted to the nurse aide registry for possible inclusion of the finding on the abuse registry and/or to the Minnesota Department of Human Services for possible disqualification in accordance with the provisions of the background study requirements under Minnesota 245C. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Blue Earth County Attorney Mankato City Attorney Mankato Police Department PRINTED: 02/01/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 23858 12/11/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 110 RAVEN COURT AUTUMN GRACE II MANKATO, MN 56001 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On December 11, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint HL238587645M/HL238584303C. The following correction order is issued, tag identification 2360. 02360 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment 02360 Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.
Other facilities in Blue Earth County.
Other memory care facilities in Blue Earth County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.