Oak Ridge Assisted Living of H.
Oak Ridge Assisted Living of H is Grade C, ranked in the top 48% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Dec 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 142 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Oak Ridge Assisted Living of H has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Oak Ridge Assisted Living of H's record and state requirements.
The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection was on December 17, 2025, and no deficiencies were cited — can you walk us through how the facility prepared for that inspection and what documentation MDH reviewed during the visit?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
One complaint was filed with MDH during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the facility's written response or corrective action plan if any remediation was required?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statutes chapter 144G — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program and explain how staff competency in dementia care is documented and maintained?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-12-17Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A standard inspection of Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings was completed on December 17, 2025, and resulted in correction orders for fire protection and physical environment deficiencies and background study requirements. The facility was assessed a total fine of $1,500.00 — $500 for the fire protection and physical environment violation and $1,000 for the background studies violation — and must document corrective actions taken within specified timeframes.
Full inspector notes
correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement; Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISE D09/13/2021 Oak Ridge Assisted Living Of Hastings January 21, 2026 Page 2 pursuant to this survey: 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment - $500.00 1290 - 144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required - $1,000.00 The refor e, in accor danc e wit h Minn. Sta t. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.999 9, the total amount you are assessed is $1,500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accorda nce with Min n. Stat. § 144G.30, Sub d. 5(c), th e lic ens ee mus t docum ent ac tions taken t o comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the · resident( s)/ employee( s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s · resident( s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with · the specific statute( s). CORRECTIO NORDER RECONSIDERATIO PNROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order( s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn.us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm REQUESTIN GA HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn. us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm Oak Ridge Assisted Living Of Hastings January 21, 2026 Page 3 To appe al fi nes via re cons iderat ion , pl ease follow the procedu r e outl ined abo ve. Plea se no te tha t you may re que st a rec onside rati on or a hearing, bu t not bot h. If you wish to cont est ta gs with out fine s in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. INFORMA LCONFERENCE In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 20, the Commissioner of Health is authorized to hold a conference to exchange information, clarify issues, or resolve issues. The Department of Health staff would like to schedule a conference call with Oak Ridge Assisted Living Of Hastings. Please contact Jodi Johnson at 507-344-2730 on or before Monday, January 26, 2026, to schedule the conference call. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/ or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your conv enien ce at thi s link: https: / / forms. office.com/ g/ Bm5uQEpHVa. Your inpu t is import ant to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan. winkelmann@state. mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jodi Johnson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: jodi.johnson@ state. mn.us Telephone: 507-344-2730 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 JMD PRINTED: 01/ 21/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30750 12/ 17/ 2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1128 BAHLS DRIVE OAK RIDGE ASST LVG OF HASTINGS HASTINGS, MN 55033 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER( S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G. 08 to 144G. 95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag. "The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL30750016- 0 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On December 15, 2025, through December 17, STATES, "PROVIDER' S PLAN OF 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health CORRECTION. " THIS APPLIES TO conducted a full survey at the above provider and FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS the following correction orders are issued. At the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. time of the survey, there were 62 residents; 60 receiving services under the Assisted Living THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Facility with Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. 1290: An immediate correction order was issued on December 16, 2025, at a level 3/Widespread THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS (I). USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND The licensee took immediate action; however, the REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL scope and level remains at I. ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G. 31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 100 144G.
2024-02-26Complaint Investigation1 · Substantiated Finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that an assisted living staff member consumed alcohol throughout his evening shift until his blood alcohol content was close to four times the legal limit, resulting in neglect of 20 residents in his care, with at least four residents receiving incorrect medications and documentation of medication administration falsified. The staff member was found intoxicated in a resident's room nearly two hours after his shift ended, and law enforcement recovered whiskey in his possession. Although residents did not suffer documented ill effects from the medication errors, the full extent of errors could not be determined due to the falsified records.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Full inspector notes
Finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) neglected residents when he consumed alcohol while working and became intoxicated. As a result, multiple residents did not receive their medications, or received the wrong medications. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP neglected 20 residents when he consumed alcohol before and throughout his evening shift to the point his blood alcohol content was close to four times the legal limit. The AP was responsible for the care and services of 20 residents on the assisted living unit of the facility. The facility had staff in the memory care unit, however, memory care staff are not allowed to leave a memory care unattended and they were unaware of the AP’s incapacitation. Although the residents did not suffer ill effects from medication errors, the extent of errors could not be determined because the AP falsified documentation. An equal opportunity employer. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted law enforcement. The investigation included review of resident records, court documentation, and employee files. Also, the investigator toured the facility and observed staff members administer medications. The AP provided medication services for 20 residents at the time of the incident during the evening shift (2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.). All residents lived in the assisted living area of the facility. Specifically, nursing staff affirmed resident #1, resident #2, resident #3, and resident #4 received incorrect medications after the AP’s shift. Two other unlicensed personnel (ULP) were also scheduled on the evening shift; however, they worked in the memory care unit of the facility. Resident #1’s diagnoses included heart disease, asthma, and a history of back problems. Resident #1’s service plan indicated she required assistance with medications. Resident #1’s nursing assessment indicated she was alert, but forgetful. Resident #1’s was at risk for falls and wandered when she was confused. Resident #2’s diagnoses included diabetes (high blood sugar levels), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), and arthritis. Resident #2’s service plan indicated she required assistance with bathing, toileting, and medications. Resident #2’s nursing assessment indicated she was alert and could walk, but she had balance problems and required a cane. Resident #3’s diagnoses included heart failure, anxiety, osteopenia (bone loss), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Resident #3’s service plan indicated she required assistance with dressing and medications. Resident #3’s nursing assessment indicated she was alert, but forgetful. Resident #3 was able to walk with supervision but used a wheelchair without assistance. Resident #4’s diagnoses included diabetes, chronic pain, and asthma. Resident #4’s service plan indicated he received assistance with bathing, dressing, and medications. Resident #4’s nursing assessment indicated he was alert and walked without assistance. The facility’s internal investigation indicated the facility nurse received a call from the night shift ULP who reported she found the AP at 11:30 p.m. in resident #1’s room. The night shift ULP reported the AP seemed drunk and smelt like alcohol. Recalling the narcotic count at the start of her shift around 10:00 p.m., he kept covering his mouth. Five minutes later, another ULP called the nurse to report she went to check on the AP after the night shift ULP reported her concerns and found the AP passed out on resident #1’s couch. The nurse contacted 911 to report the AP was found intoxicated in a resident’s room, nearly two hours after the end of his shift. Law enforcement arrived and found whiskey in the AP’s cup and more alcohol in his car. The AP said throughout his shift he continued to go out to his car and fill up his cup with alcohol. There were eight residents involved in suspected medication errors. During an interview, a manager said facility staff told him they found the AP “passed out” in a resident’s room. The manager said the staff member told him the AP smelled of alcohol, so he told her to call emergency assistance (911). The manager said it was difficult to decipher which residents received their medications and which residents did not receive their medications because the AP’s documentation was inaccurate. The manager said there were other staff members working at the time of the incident, however they did not see the AP during their shift. The manager said it would not be unusual for other staff members not to see him, because the AP worked on a floor by himself. The manager said the nurse contacted the residents’ medical providers and monitored the residents for ill effects from medication errors. The manager said the facility notified family members about the incident. During an interview, resident # 1 said she saw the AP throughout the shift, and he seemed “pretty happy”, but he kept disappearing. Resident #1 said she had back problems and was supposed to receive narcotic medication for pain. She asked the AP for the pain medication, but was unsure if she received the medication, and could not recall what medications the AP gave her. Resident #1 said the AP entered her room in the evening and told her he needed to go to sleep. Resident #1 asked the AP if he had been drinking and he responded, “yeah”. Resident #1 said the AP sat on her couch and then fell asleep. Resident #1 said the AP slept there until another staff member entered her room and saw him, then the police came to her room and woke him up. Resident #1 said she was concerned about the incident and was fearful the facility would kick her out because the AP slept on her couch, however she did not know what to do in the situation. Resident #1’s medication administration record (MAR) indicated the AP gave her all her medications for the evening. The AP documented he gave the medication to her late, outside the time frame she was supposed to receive them. Also, the MAR lacked indication the AP gave her narcotic (pain) medication during his shift. Resident #2’s MAR indicated she required insulin. Documentation indicated the AP administered the insulin to the resident, along with another medication. The AP documented he gave the medications late, outside the time frame allotted for their administration. Resident #3’s MAR indicated the AP gave her all her scheduled evening medications within the allotted time frame including her blood thinning medication. Resident #4’s MAR indicated the AP gave him all his medications for the evening, but gave them late, outside the time frame allotted for their administration. Resident # 4’s medications included an insulin injection, narcotic (pain), cardiac (heart), and psychoactive (affects mental process) medications. During an interview, a nurse said she went to the facility at the time of the incident and looked though the medication cart with law enforcement. The nurse said they could tell the AP made multiple medication errors during his shift. The nurse said she spoke to resident #1 who told her she took medications given to her by the AP, but there was a different room number written on the medication cup he gave to her. The nurse said resident #2 told her she did not receive her insulin. The nurse said resident #3 did not receive her blood thinning medication. Although the AP documented he administered the medication, he could not have administered the medication because the tracking system for the medication indicated he did not remove the medication from the package. The nurse said resident #4 did not receive his medications because those were the medications the AP gave to resident #1. District court documentation indicated the AP was charged with criminal neglect (intentional neglect). The AP’s job duties included every two-hour safety checks on 20 residents and medication administration. Law enforcement observed the AP sleeping on a resident’s couch. Law enforcement woke the AP and detected a strong odor of alcohol coming from him and noticed his eyes were red and watery. The AP’s movements were slow and uncoordinated, and he slurred his speech.
2023-07-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A standard licensing survey was conducted at Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings from July 10–12, 2023, and correction orders were issued for violations of Minnesota statutes. The facility was found not in compliance with food preparation and service requirements under Minnesota Statute 144G.41. No immediate fines were assessed, and the facility must document corrective actions taken within the time period specified on the state form.
Full inspector notes
CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. The MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines and enforcement actions based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Oak Ridge Assisted Living Of Hastings July 31, 2023 Page 2 CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by the MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. A state correction order under Minn. Stat. § 144G.91, Subd. 8, Free from Maltreatment is associated with a maltreatment determination by the Office of Health Facility Complaints. If maltreatment is substantiated, you will receive a separate letter with the reconsideration process under Minn. Stat. § 626.557. Please email reconsideration requests to: Health.HRD.Appeals@state.mn.us. Please attach this letter as part of your reconsideration request. Please clearly indicate which tag(s) you are contesting and submit information supporting your position(s). Please address your cover letter for reconsideration requests to: Reconsideration Unit 85 East Seventh Place St. Paul, MN 55164-0970 You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jonathan Hill, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: jonathan.hill@state.mn.us Telephone: 651-201-3993 Fax: 6 51-281-9796 JMD PRINTED: 07/31/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30750 07/12/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1128 BAHLS DRIVE OAK RIDGE ASST LVG OF HASTINGS HASTINGS, MN 55033 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Licensing ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Correction Orders using federal software. CORRECTION ORDER(S) Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section Living License Providers. The assigned 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are tag number appears in the far left column issued pursuant to a survey. entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute out of compliance is listed in requires compliance with all requirements the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" provided at the Statute number indicated below. column. This column also includes the When Minnesota Statute contains several items, findings which are in violation of the state failure to comply with any of the items will be requirement after the statement, "This considered lack of compliance. Minnesota requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the surveyors' INITIAL COMMENTS: findings is the Time Period for Correction. SL30750015 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF On July 10, 2023, through July 12, 2023, the THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH survey at the above provider, and the following CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO correction orders are issued. At the time of the FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS survey, there were 60 active residents receiving WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. services under the Assisted Living with Dementia Care license. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level pursuant to 144G.31 Subd. 1, 2 and 3. 0 480 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements (13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 EP8311 If continuation sheet 1 of 12 PRINTED: 07/31/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30750 07/12/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1128 BAHLS DRIVE OAK RIDGE ASST LVG OF HASTINGS HASTINGS, MN 55033 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents). The findings include: Please refer to the included document titled, Food and Beverage Establishment Inspection Report dated July 10, 2023, for the specific Minnesota Food Code deficiencies. TIME PERIOD FOR CORRECTION: Twenty-one (21) days 0 660 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and 0 660 SS=D control (a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, as published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The program must STATE FORM 6899 EP8311 If continuation sheet 2 of 12 PRINTED: 07/31/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30750 07/12/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1128 BAHLS DRIVE OAK RIDGE ASST LVG OF HASTINGS HASTINGS, MN 55033 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 660 Continued From page 2 0 660 include a tuberculosis infection control plan that covers all paid and unpaid employees, contractors, students, and regularly scheduled volunteers. The commissioner shall provide technical assistance regarding implementation of the guidelines. (b) The facility must maintain written evidence of compliance with this subdivision.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.