Ivy Park at Wood Ranch.
Ivy Park at Wood Ranch is Ranked in the top 41% of California memory care with 5 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 47 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Ivy Park at Wood Ranch has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Elopements, fires, epidemic outbreaks, and poisonings must be reported immediately. Abuse with serious bodily injury requires a 2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report to CDSS, Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement. Abuse without serious bodily injury must be reported within 24 hours. A resident death requires a phone call by the next working day and a written report within 7 days. Injuries requiring medical treatment beyond first aid, and bankruptcy/foreclosure/utility shutoff notices, must also be reported. Incidents not reported on time are a separate violation — families may file a complaint directly with CDSS.
Ask on tour
“When was the last incident report filed with CDSS, and may I see your incident log summary for the past 12 months?”
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-09Other VisitType A · 1 finding
“Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as staff continued to administer a medication to R1 that was discontinued by R1’s PCP which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from 9099 On 06/11/2025, medical records from Adventists Health – Simi Valley were reviewed. Between 07/07/25 and 09/15/25, The Department interviewed current and former facility staff, R1’s Responsible Party (RP) and other relevant parties. R1’s charting notes covering periods from 01/28/25 through 07/06/25 were also reviewed. On 11/26/2025 between 09:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., LPA Balisi conducted a subsequent complaint visit. At approx. 09:45 a.m. LPA conducted physical plant tour, interviewed staff and reviewed and obtained additional copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that due to neglect/ lack of care and supervision R1 had toxic levels of a prescribed medication identified by medical providers. Interviews conducted and records review revealed that R1 was transported to the hospital on 04/21/2025 for evaluation of a skin rash and blistering. During that hospitalization, medical staff identified toxic levels of the prescribed medication Depakote in R1’s system. Hospital discharge instructions directed that Depakote be held, pending follow-up with R1’s primary care provider. Upon R1’s return to the facility, the discharge instructions were provided to facility staff by R1’s family and private caregiver, and staff were verbally informed of the medication hold. On 05/14/2025, R1 was again transported to the hospital, at which time laboratory results showed Depakote levels that were higher than those recorded on 04/21/2025. A review of facility medication records indicated that on 04/28/2025, staff began administering a newly prescribed medication, Keppra, but did not discontinue Depakote as directed in the hospital discharge instructions. As a result, from 04/28/2025 through 05/14/2025, R1 received both Depakote and Keppra. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the allegation of neglect / lack of care and supervision, related to the continued administration of a medication that had been ordered to be held, has been deemed substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D.) Executive Director was informed that failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 It was reported that “Due to lack of supervision, resident fell resulting in a bruise” as It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained a bruise to the abdomen as a result of a fall. Interviews conducted and records reviewed reflected that that R1 experienced a fall on 04/27/2025. On 05/09/2025, staff observed a bruise on the right side of R1’s abdomen. No fall involving R1 was documented on 05/09/2025, and R1 was unable to identify how the bruise occurred. A review of facility records indicated that no additional falls involving R1 were documented between 04/27/2025 and 05/09/2025.LPA’s interview with Staff revealed that, based on the circumstances of the fall on 04/27/2025, the observed bruise did not appear consistent with that fall. Staff reported that following the fall, R1 were found lying on their back with their head on a pillow and were not positioned against or in contact with any object at the time they were found. It was further revealed that R1 uses a scooter and has been observed leaning forward onto the scooter handles. Staff also stated that the bruise may have resulted from contact with two exposed metal poles on an attachable bed rail when the rail is in the lowered position. Staff explained that the poles are exposed when the bed rail is lowered. A review of R1’s charting notes indicated that since 01/28/2025, R1 has experienced a total of five unwitnessed falls. No significant injuries were reported as a result of these falls. Following R1’s first three falls, charting notes dated 05/01/2025 indicated that Home Health recommended R1 receive assistance with all upright activities due to increased fall risk. Records further revealed that R1 experienced two additional unwitnessed falls on 06/05/2025 and 06/10/2025. Both incidents occurred in R1’s room. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Due to lack of supervision, resident fell resulting in a bruise” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that “Staff did not notify authorized representative of bruise on resident”, as It was alleged that R1’s responsible party was not notified in a timely manner of a bruise observed on R1. Interviews were conducted and records reviewed reflected that on 05/09/2025, Staff #1 (S1) observed a bruise on the right side of R1’s abdomen. According to charting notes, S1 informed R1’s private caregiver of the observed bruise. The private caregiver is listed in R1’s records as Emergency Contact #2. The charting notes further indicated that the private caregiver requested Tylenol for R1 and stated they would notify R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) of the bruise. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed, S1 stated that they asked R1’s private caregiver, who was present in R1’s room at the time, to send a text message to R1’s POA regarding the bruise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from 9099-C S1 further stated that after assessing R1, they also directly contacted R1’s POA to report the observed bruise. Interviews with R1’s POA and R1’s private caregiver revealed that both individuals stated they did not recall being notified of the bruise. Interviews were conducted with seven (7) facility staff. All seven staff stated that when a bruise or change in condition is observed, the med tech or appropriate staff are notified immediately, the resident is assessed, and notifications are made to the resident’s family or responsible party, the primary care physician, and any involved home health agencies. None of the staff interviewed reported concerns regarding untimely notification to required parties when a bruise or change in condition is observed. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not notify authorized representative of bruise on resident” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.
2026-04-09Complaint InvestigationType B · 2 findings
“Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as incident reports (LIC 624) for multiple falls for R1 were not sent to the RO in a timely manner which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.”
“Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as no updated reappraisals were observed in R1’s file after R1 experienced multiple falls, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit in conjunction with a complaint visit (Complaint Control # 29-AS-20250515145455). The purpose of the visit is to issue citations for deficiencies observed during the complaint investigation unrelated to the complaint. Upon arrival, LPA met with Executive Director Kellie Smith and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation between 07/07/25 and 09/15/25, The Department reviewed Resident #1(R1s) charting notes covering the period from 01/28/25 through 07/06/25. Charting notes revealed that since 01/28/25, R1 experienced a total of four (4) unwitnessed falls on 03/11/2025 at 11:00 a.m., and 01:59 p.m., on 04/12/2025 at 01:25 p.m., on 04/27/2025 at 04:42 p.m. On 05/01/25, Home Health recommended that R1 receive assistance with all upright activities due to fall risk. After Home health’s recommendation R1 experienced additional falls on 06/05/2025 at 04:22 a.m. and on 06/10/2025 at 04:10 p.m. LPA’s records review of incident reports (LIC 624) revealed the Regional Office (RO) only received an incident report for the fall on 06/10/2025. LPA’s records review of R1’s file revealed there was no reappraisal on file after home health’s recommendation that R1 receive assistance with all upright activities due to fall risk on 05/01/2025. The following deficiencies were cited from the Title 22 California Code of Regulations. (See LIC 809-D). The Executive Director was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report was provided
2026-02-12Other VisitType A · 2 findings
“Based on interviews and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above cited section in that R1 did not receive adequate care and supervision resulting in bodily injuries which poses/posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above cited section in CCLD and R1's family were not adequately notified of R1's incidents in a timely manner which poses/posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit in conjunction with Complaint #29-AS-20250514091509. The LPA arrived at 9:57AM and met with Executive Director (ED) Kellie Smith. Entrance interview conducted. On 09/10/2025, the Complaint investigation was referred to Community Care Licensing Division’s (CCLD) Program Clinical Consultant (PCC) and assigned to Lorena Kho. PCC Kho reviewed documents including facility files, hospice records, and hospital records. During today’s visit, LPA Huynh and the ED conducted a physical plant tour at 10:03AM and no immediate concerns were observed. The following was revealed during the Complaint investigation: Between 05/05/2025 and 05/12/2025, Resident #1 (R1) sustained three (3) falls resulting in wrist fractures, a skin laceration, and significant physical pain. On the morning of 05/06/2025, R1 informed their Hospice nurse of an unwitnessed fall that occurred the evening of 05/05/2025. According to Hospice notes, facility staff denied the fall due to the absence of documentation. Later that same day, during a care plan meeting with R1’s family, the facility disclosed an unwitnessed fall that caused bruising and swelling to R1’s right shoulder, though no specific date or time was provided. The facility did not provide any additional information or documentation regarding the care plan meeting. Report Continued on LIC 809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On 05/07/2025, R1 sustained a second fall in the dining room, landing in a seated position on the floor while attempting to reach for a snack. On 05/12/2025, R1 was left unattended near a fireplace and was found on the floor with a skin laceration. Staff interviews revealed that R1 had been left unsupervised while staff attended to another resident, and R1 was later discovered by a staff passing by. R1 began reporting pain and limited mobility in their arm on 05/06/2025. The facility notified Hospice who recommended as needed (PRN) medications, increased dosages, and provided new medication orders. In the following days, R1 continued to report severe pain and was unable to move their arm. Facility staff and the Hospice nurse observed extensive bruising and swelling extending from R1’s right shoulder to the right arm and upper right chest. Staff documentation included observations such as: “moaning in pain and [their] arm is extremely swollen and bruised,” “redness and swelling continues to worsen,” and “right hand is so swollen and [their] arm just hanging down [their] recliner.” The Facility Assessment Summary documented R1’s last assessment on 02/05/2025 with an effective date of 05/01/2025. The Assessment indicated R1 required standby assistance and cueing for transfers and showering, did not require assistance with repositioning, and was able to ambulate to the dining room and participate in activities without assistance. R1 was identified as a high fall risk and at high risk for fractures due to osteopenia. The Assessment instructed staff to “provide personalized interventions, per fall management protocol,” but did not specify active transfer or ambulation assistance or other safety measures to prevent falls or fractures. The facility did not complete an updated assessment or implement additional safety interventions following R1’s initial falls, further increasing R1’s risk for subsequent falls and injury. Report Continued on LIC 809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On 05/25/2025 CCLD received an Incident Report stating that R1 experienced a “slip/fall” on 05/12/2025 resulting in a skin laceration and was hospitalized on 05/13/2025 when fractures were discovered. The Incident Report also referenced an unwitnessed fall on 05/06/2025 “which didn’t result in any serious injuries except slight complaints of discomfort… noted by light bruise on the clavicle.” However, the report did not disclose R1’s second fall on 05/07/2025. Interviews with R1’s family revealed that the facility did not communicate or disclose the seriousness of R1’s condition, aside from receiving notification of the first and last falls. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and supervision to R1, resulting in fractures of the distal radius and distal ulna with soft tissue swelling, as well as a skin laceration. The facility also failed to provide timely and adequate notification to R1’s family and did not submit required notification to CCLD within seven (7) days of the occurrences, as required by reporting regulations. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 was assessed today (Refer to LIC421M). The ED was informed that additional civil penalties may be assessed based on Health and Safety code Section 1569.49. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations and/or the Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (Refer to 809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and report was reviewed and provided.
2025-07-08Other VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Martha Arroyo and Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced annual inspection today. At approx 09:50 a.m. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Kellie Smith and explained the reason for the visit. At approx 10:30am, the LPAs along with the Executive Director and Maintenance Director, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Facility dining room and commercial kitchen were inspected and found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations. The LPAs observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable foods to meet the minimum two day and seven day supply of food and water. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates and food labels had expiration date clearly marked. LPAs observed ten (10) resident rooms total six (6) in the assisted living side and four (4) resident rooms in memory care. All resident rooms were furnished appropriately, with clean linens and appropriate furnishings. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. Starting at 10:38am, the hot water temperature was measured in seven (7) assisted living bathrooms and four (4) memory care bathrooms, between 109 – 117.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The common areas on the first floor consists of the bistro, 2 separate dining areas, a living room, movie room, and multiple activity rooms. Also, on the first floor were observed several offices, staff lounge, a copy room, and a supply room. The second-floor common areas consists of the beauty salon, dining room, leisure/lounge room, offices, and multiple other activity rooms. LPA's observed common areas to be clean and in good condition. There are games and/or activity supplies in the activity rooms as well as throughout the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The common areas were appropriately furnished, and the lighting was adequate. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, sprinklers and fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility. The emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted throughout the hallways. The facility has required postings, including emergency exit plan, Licensing Complaint Poster, Resident Personal Rights, Theft and Loss Policy, and Resident Council Rights. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. Emergency evacuation chairs were present in all stairways. The facility has approved delayed egress systems in the Memory Care unit. There is a secured patio area with tables and chairs for residents within the Memory Care unit. There is also a large outdoor space with shaded areas and adequate furniture for resident use throughout the facility. All passageways, walkways, driveways, steps and patios are free from obstructions and hazards at this time. Several fire extinguisher were observed throughout the facility to be fully charged and last serviced on 12/18/2024. LPAs reviewed ten (10) resident records and ten (10) personnel records starting at 11:50am. Ten resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. (10) personnel files including the current Executive Director’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments with TB results, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate yearly training. All files appeared to be in order during the visit. LPAs reviewed medications at approximately 1:30pm. The medications are centrally stored in a med rooms on the 2nd floor. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents in care. PRNs have physicians order on file. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Medications appeared to be given as prescribed at the time of the visit. During today’s visit, the LPAs reviewed the facility's infection control policy as well as their emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Daily vehicle inspection list and California Highway Patrol Inspection report was reviewed for facility vehicles. The last fire safety inspection was completed on 05/6/2025 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of inspections. Emergency disaster drills conducted quarterly as per regulation; last disaster drill conducted on 06/26/2025. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and copy provided.
2025-06-27Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from 9099 Since then, interviews conducted and records review revealed Ecolab has conducted additional visits for preventative measures on 05/09/2025, 05/30/2025 where no new bed bug activity was found. On 06/09/2025 during an Ecolab service call, one (1) bed bug was found in room 227. The room was treated on 06/13/2025. Since 06/09/2025, no additional bed bug activity has been reported by staff. During the LPA's physical inspection of rooms, 226, 225, 227, 223, 217, 231, surrounding rooms, and adjacent areas, no evidence of bed bugs was observed. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not keep the facility free of bedbugs” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.
2024-10-28Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted a subsequent unannounced Case Management - Incident visit at approx 11:00 a.m. to continue the investigation of a self-reported incident that was initially conducted on 09/05/2024 between 12:30 p.m. - 02:30 p.m. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director Lilit Mnatsakanyan and explained the reason for the visit. At approx 11:15 a.m. LPA conducted physical plant, interviewed staff, residents and reviewed and obtained copies of additional pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. On 08/23/2024, the Department received an incident reports stating on 08/15/2024 at approx 8am, Staff #1 (S1) was observed to be handling Resident #1(R1) in a firm manner while R1 attempted to swing their arms in an agitated manner, resulting in discoloration / bruising on R1's forearms. R1 did not indicate any discomfort or additional injuries. Interviews conducted with staff and Executive Director revealed on 08/15/2024 at approx 8:00 a.m. Staff #2 (S2) attempted to change R1's clothes for breakfast. R1 reacted with increased agitation and became combative towards S2. S1 entered the room to provide assistance to S2. R1's agitation and combative behavior escalated towards both staff members. S1 then restrained R1 by grasping both wrists, which led to bruising on R1's forearms. LPA's records review indicated S1 was suspended pending an investigation, both law enforcement and R1's family were notified of the incident on the same day it occurred. Additionally, S1 voluntarily resigned from their position following the incident. Based on the investigation's findings, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that S1 handled R1 in a rough manner , resulting in bruising on R1's forearms. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to 809-D). Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and appeal rights were reviewed and issued during today's visit.
2024-09-05Other VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced Case Management – Incident visit at 12:30 p.m. for the purpose of investigating self reported incident reports. Upon arrival, LPA met Interim Executive Director Kathleen Olson and explained the reason for the visit. On 08/23/2024, the Department received an incident reports stating on 08/15/2024 at approx 8am, Staff #1 (S1) was observed to be handling Resident #1(R1) in a firm manner while R1 attempted to swing their arms in an agitated manner, resulting in discoloration / bruising on R1's forearms. R1 did not indicate any discomfort or additional injuries. At approx 12:30pm, LPA conducted physical plant interviewed staff and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. LPA has determine further investigation is needed and will return at a later date to complete the investigation if warranted. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.
2024-07-11Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted a pre-licensing visit to the above noted facility. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by applicant representative/ Executive Director Jeanne Skondin. This is a change of ownership application, but the facility name will remain the same. Entrance interview conducted. LPA inspected facility for Fire Safety, Personal Accommodations and Services, and Food Service. The facility is two-story. At 9:45am, a physical plant tour was conducted inside and out. An approved fire clearance was received, clearing them for ninety-two (92) non-ambulatory residents; and eight (8) bedridden residents. The facility has a capacity total of one hundred (100) residents. The facility has an approved fire clearance for bedridden in any bedroom on both the first and second floors, front desk will maintain current roster of bedridden residents’ room location. There is one central kitchen that distributes food to the 3 dining rooms. The kitchen contained a walk-in pantry with a sufficient supply of canned foods, and emergency food and water. The walk-in refrigerator and freezer were observed to have an ample supply of perishable and nonperishable food supplies. The freezer was maintained at zero degrees Fahrenheit, and the refrigerator was maintained at 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Stove burners are rendered inaccessible to the residents. The supply of dishes, utensils, pots, pans, and drink ware is adequate. There are no pesticides (poisons) or toxins stored in any food storage area or preparation area with utensils. Appliances in the kitchen were clean and all appeared functional. Trash cans had tight fitting lids. Cleaning supplies are stored separately from food preparation areas in locked storage closets throughout the facility. There are three (3) laundry rooms throughout the facility for resident use. No flies or other vermin were observed. Report Continued on LIC 809C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Report Continued from LIC 809... The common areas were appropriately furnished, and the lighting was adequate. The common areas on the first floor consists of the bistro, 2 separate dining areas, a living room, movie room, and multiple activity rooms. Also, on the first floor were observed several offices, staff lounge, a copy room, and a supply room. The second-floor common areas consists of the beauty salon, dining room, leisure/lounge room, offices, and multiple other activity rooms. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, sprinklers and fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility. LPA obtained a copy of the most recent Sprinkler and smoke detector inspection conducted. The fire extinguishers were observed and are fully charged. The emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted throughout the hallways. The facility has required postings, including emergency exit plan, Licensing Complaint Poster, Resident Personal Rights, Theft and Loss Policy, and Resident Council Rights. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. Emergency evacuation chairs were present in all stairways. The facility has approved delayed egress systems in the Memory Care unit. There is a secured patio area with tables and chairs for residents within the Memory Care unit. There is also a large outdoor space with shaded areas and adequate furniture for resident use throughout the facility. All passageways, walkways, driveways, steps and patios are free from obstructions and hazards at this time. All resident rooms are set up with beds, nightstands, lamps, chests of drawers, chairs, and closet space. The beds are furnished with box springs, comfortable mattress, and clean linen, which includes, a mattress pad, top and bottom linens, pillowcases, blanket, and a bedspread. Lighting in the rooms appeared adequate. The bedrooms were large enough to allow for easy passage between the beds and furniture with a wheelchair or walker. In addition, no bedroom was used as a passageway to another room, bath, or toilet. There are no staff rooms – awake night staff only on premises. All rooms were free of odors. All window screens were clean and maintained in good repair. Report Continued on LIC 809C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Report Continued from LIC 809C... The resident bathrooms have a shower with non-skid surfaces. The toilet and shower have grab bars. The hot water temperature was tested in random resident rooms in the Assisted Living area and was found to be within the range of 105 degrees Fahrenheit and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature was also tested in random resident rooms in the Memory Care area and was found to be within the range of 105 degrees Fahrenheit and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. At 11:00am, the LPA conducted a file review or resident and staff records. Resident and staff records are stored in the Business Director’s office. Medications are centrally stored in the Medications Room / Nurses Station which is located on the second floor. In addition, there are total of four (4) medication carts located throughout the facility. The first aid supplies were complete, including a thermometer and a current version of a first aid manual. They were stored in the medication room. The physical plant of this facility location is in compliance with Title 22 regulations at this time. No corrections required at this time Comp III conducted with Applicant Representative/Executive Director. This report will be sent to the Centralized Application Bureau (CAB). You will be notified by the CAB Analyst when your license has been approved. You are not allowed to begin operating until you have been notified that your license has been approved by the CAB Analyst. Failure to comply could affect approval of your license. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.
Other facilities in Ventura County.
Other memory care facilities in Ventura County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
Other facilities under this operator
Transformer Opco Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc — as recorded on state license extracts. Each facility still has its own inspection history.
