Lynne & Roy M Frank Residences.
Lynne & Roy M Frank Residences is Ranked in the top 19% of California memory care with 3 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 94 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Lynne & Roy M Frank Residences has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Lynne & Roy M Frank Residences's record and state requirements.
The facility has 2 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
11 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The February 4, 2026 inspection is the most recent on record — can you provide the deficiency notice from that visit and walk families through the corrective actions completed for any cited items?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
13 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-11Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 11, 2026, the state investigated a complaint that a staff member handled a resident roughly. The facility self-reported the incident and cooperated with the investigation; no violations were found during the visit, though the state indicated it may conduct additional follow-up as needed.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 03/11/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted a case management incident visit at the facility regarding a self-reported incident involving an allegation of rough handling of resident R1 by staff S1. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Gloria Vo and explained the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and collected documentation related to th e incident. LPA also reviewed facility documentation related to the incident report and the facility’s response. The Department will continue to review the information obtained . Additional follow-up may be conducted as needed. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Report was reviewed with Assistant Administrator and a copy was provided.
2026-02-04Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
The Department investigated complaints about residents leaving the facility unsupervised, staff failing to change soiled diapers promptly, staff not following residents' dietary plans, and a medication error involving a resident. Interviews with residents and review of facility records did not support any of these allegations. The Department determined there was not enough evidence to prove these complaints occurred.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent residents from eloping from the facility, the Department conducted investigation. Interviews with residents did not indicate that residents left the facility without staff awareness or supervision. Facility records reviewed did not document any resident elopement incidents. Regarding the allegation that staff left residents in soiled diapers for a long period of time, the Department conducted investigation. Interviews with residents did not support the allegation, and residents did not report being left in soiled diapers or clothing. No documentation or additional evidence was obtained to corroborate the allegation. Regarding the allegation that staff are not following residents’ dietary plans, the Department conducted investigation. Document review and resident interviews did not identify evidence that residents’ dietary plans were not being followed. Residents interviewed did not report concerns regarding meals inconsistent with their dietary needs. The complaint alleged that client C1 was administered medications that did belong to another individual. The LPA determined there was conflicting information indicating that C1 did not reside at the facility, and there was insufficient corroborating evidence to substantiate the allegation. Although the above allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. This report is reviewed and a copy this report is provided to the administrator.
2025-09-05Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On September 3, 2025, a resident was found unresponsive in their bed and died despite CPR efforts by nursing staff and emergency responders. The facility reported the death to the state and investigators reviewed documentation and interviewed staff during a follow-up visit on September 5, 2025. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 09/05/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on a death report submitted on 09/03/2025. LPA met with administrator Robert Sarison, purpose of the visit e xplained to administrator. The facility reported that on September 3, 2025, Resident R1 passed away and the immediate cause of death was not disclosed. According to the death report submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL), on August 31, 2025, at approximately 6:45 AM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) S1 found Resident R1 unresponsive and lying in a pool of emesis on the bed. S1 initiated CPR but was unable to revive the resident. Emergency services were called, and paramedics arrived and pronounced R1 deceased at the scene. During today’s visit, LPA revie wed and collected relevant documentation and conducted interviews with director of health and wellness S2. S1 was not available for interview at the time of the visit. The administrator stated that the facility will request a copy of the official death certificate once it becomes available. No citations issued. Report discussed with administrator.
2025-08-14Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was the facility's required annual inspection on August 14, 2025. The inspector toured all five floors of the building, reviewed safety systems including emergency call buttons, fire equipment, and infection control practices, and checked that medications and hazardous materials were stored securely and out of residents' reach. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 08/14/2025 Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to conduct the Annual 1-year required visit. LPA was greeted by administrator, Robert Sarison and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds, consisting of studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units on 5 floors. 1st floor had Assisted living rooms, kitchen, common use rooms for the assisted living residents--lounges, dinning rooms, theater, performance center, cafe, salon, and fitness center, including locked indoor pool. 2nd, 3rd, 4th floor had assisted living room and memories care rooms. 5th floor had assisted living rooms only. In each of the memory care units, there is at least one dedicated dining room and outdoor space. The building accommodates residents, including non-ambulatory, and hospice residents. Rooms are equipped with emergency call systems, which can be activated from bathrooms and bedrooms. Basement parking lead to emergency generator. 2 outdoor courtyards, accessible from 1st floor, had no accessible body of water. Kitchen and food supplies are inspected. Infection control practices are reviewed. PPE supply is adequate. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature is maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, and lighting is sufficient for comfort and safety. Fire safety equipment checked and fully charged. Facility van's first-aid kit and fire extinguisher inspected and complete. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been reviewed. No deficiency cited today. The report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided.
2025-06-05Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector made an unannounced visit to deliver an updated complaint report to the facility's Assistant Executive Director. No violations were found. The facility management confirmed they understood the amended report.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver an amended complaint report. LPA met with Gloria Vo - Assistant Executive Director during today's visit. LPA explained the amended report delivery and the reason it was amended. She confirmed that she understood the amended report. No citations issued. Report reviewed with Assistant Executive Director.
2025-03-19Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
2024-09-19Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine inspection of the entire facility, including all five floors with assisted living and memory care units, common areas, kitchens, and outdoor spaces. Inspectors checked emergency call systems, medication storage, fire safety equipment, infection control practices, staff clearances, and other safety and health standards, and found no deficiencies. The facility includes dedicated dining and outdoor spaces in memory care units, accessible accommodations for residents with varying mobility needs, and emergency equipment like first-aid kits and fire extinguishers.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
LPA Yi Sam Jian and Dominic Tobola toured facility and grounds, consisting of studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units on 5 floors. 1st floor had Assisted living rooms, kitchen, common use rooms for the assisted living residents--lounges, dinning rooms, theater, performance center, cafe, salon, and fitness center, including locked indoor pool. 2nd, 3rd, 4th floor had assisted living room and memories care rooms. 5th floor had assisted living rooms only. In each of the memory care units, there is at least one dedicated dining room and outdoor space. The building accommodates residents, including non-ambulatory, bedridden and hospice residents. Rooms are equipped with emergency call systems, which can be activated from bathrooms and bedrooms. 2 outdoor courtyards, accessible from 1st floor, had no accessible body of water. Kitchen and food supplies are inspected. Infection control practices are reviewed. PPE supply is adequate. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature is maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, and lighting is sufficient for comfort and safety. Fire safety equipment checked and fully charged. Facility van's first-aid kit and fire extinguisher inspected and complete. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been reviewed. No deficiency cited today. The report is reviewed with administrator Edwina Tang and a copy is provided.
2024-08-09Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On August 9, 2024, state licensing analysts conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a report that had been submitted to the Department. The analysts reviewed care records and spoke with facility management, and no violations were identified. A copy of the inspection findings was provided to the facility.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On August 9, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts(LPAs) John Calandra and Dominic Tobola arrived at the facility at 4:28 PM to conduct an unnanounced Case Management regarding an SOC 341 and Incident Report submitted to the Department. LPAs Calandra and Tobola requested the following documents: -LIC 602 -Care Notes/Needs and Services Plan -Notes from staff An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with Michelle Delos Santos, Business Office Manager, Sandra Peret, Director of Health and Wellness, and Rob Saraison, Assistant Executive Director . No Appeal rights were provided. A copy of the report was left at the facility.
2024-08-08Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint about staffing levels was investigated through interviews with staff and review of facility schedules and records. Staff reported that call-outs are covered and residents are fed without issues, with each caregiver assigned four to five residents; the facility also has additional floaters and a nurse on shift. The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the complaint.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
LPA interviewed four staff members. All mentioned that there is no issue with regards to staffing in the facility. A staff, S3, mentioned that if there are call outs it still gets covered. Staff are also able to manage feeding without issues. Each staff interviewed has 4 to 5 residents assigned under their care. S2 also mentioned that if needed, calls another person for additional assistance. During the interview, S1 also mentioned that there is a resident (R1), has been slow in responding and can't balance anymore, eats a little bit and slowly eats or chews. S2 also confirmed that R1 is a non-verbal resident, a slow eater and has difficulty in feeding. R1 used to attend activities before and sometimes participates depending on the condition. S5 stated that there are floaters who can work both in memory care and assisted living. They are cross trained in case needed. Based on records review, the facility provided the schedule in memory care unit there is currently 4 neighborhoods where residents live. For each neighborhood there are two to three caregivers (depending on the number of residents). Aside from that there is also a nurse on shift, three med techs, two floaters and activity coordinators. LPA also checked the progress notes and meal logs for R1 and it showed that R1 is eating less and less. Records also show that facility reached out to responsible party regarding R1’s slow decline and referral to hospice. Based on interviews & records review, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.
2024-03-25Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that training records for caregivers in the memory care unit were incomplete. Two newly hired caregivers lacked documentation showing they received required dementia training, and one caregiver had only 5.5 hours of required annual dementia training instead of the 8 hours needed; additionally, there was no information available about what dementia training an agency staff member had received.
“are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement was not met, as client #1 did not receive timely medical intervention when pressure ulcers were observed, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients.”
“their needs. This requirement was not met, as responsible parties of client #1 were not notified when staff observed pressure injuries on client #1. Licensee failed to ensure that responsible parties of client #1 received timely report that pressure injuries were observed, which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff training records for 3 caregivers in memory care unit 3 are reviewed today. This does not include one agency staff, for which there is no information about what dementia training was received. Two staff were required to have at least 12 hours of dementia specific training, as part of initial training. One caregiver was required to have at least 8 hours of dementia specific training, as part of annual continuing training. There is no documentation to verify that two new staff received 12 hours of dementia specific training, and there was documentation of just 5.5 hours of annual continuing dementia training for one caregiver. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 are cited on a following page.
2023-09-19Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedCitation on file
Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.
2023-07-10Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a resident was not receiving the required three showers per week; the facility's records showed the resident received three to seven showers monthly during the period reviewed, and refused to shower at least four times, with staff offering sponge baths as alternatives though these were not documented. The investigation could not confirm whether the resident's care needs were not being met, and staffing levels appeared adequate during the review period. The complaint was unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
As per November 2021 care plan for client #1, he was to receive assistance with showers 3 times per week. Upon review of facility's ADL Reports Logs for May, June, July 2022, caregivers assisted client to shower 3 times in May, 6 times in June, and 7 times in July, and he refused to shower at least 4 times. LPA was advised that when client refused to shower, a sponge bath was offered as an alternative, but not documented by staff. It cannot be confirmed that client's needs were not met by staff. Based on review of memory care units staffing in May, June, July 2022, no staff shortages were apparent. In July 2022, there were 43 clients residing in 4 memory care units/neighborhoods. AM shift averaged 6.57 caregivers in May, 6.58 in June, and 6.93 in July; PM shift averaged 6.64 caregivers in May, 6.23 in June, and 7.2 in July; NOC shift averaged 5.25 caregivers in May, 6.0 in June, and 6.03 in July. Although the allegations may have occurred or are valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
2023-06-30Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding a resident's care and living situation. The investigation found insufficient evidence to prove whether the complaint was valid or not, though the resident's medical records confirmed she had memory problems and confusion that required close monitoring. The resident was ultimately able to leave the facility in March 2023 to return home with 24-hour companions when she was ready to do so.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Following the October meeting, DPOA arranged to have client's private home cleaned and set up for safety. This included sorting through mail, tax and financial docume nts, unpaid bills, clearing dirty laundry, clothing and clutter, as well as retaining a private care manager and hiring and scheduling 24 hour companions. Pre-placement appraisal completed prior to client's RCFE admission states that client has poor short-term memory and confusion. Facility's care plan identified that client was disoriented, forgetful and repetitious. As per MD reports dated 10/27/21--prior to admission--1/31/23, and 2/9/23, client has mild cognitive impairment and prior alcohol dependency. Most recent MD report states that 24 hour monitoring is needed due to intermittent confusion. Former resident acknowledged that in order for her to return home, she had to be fully able to access and manage the stairs in and outside her private residence. When she recovered from her injury, she expressed her desire to return home, and Ombudsman was instrumental in facilitating this in March 2023, with 24 hour companions. Her personal right to leave facility was not violated and the length of time she lived at facility was not a concern. Due to client's intermittent confusion, forgetfulness and short-term memory loss, this allegation cannot be determined to be substantiated or unfounded. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
10 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in San Francisco.
Other memory care facilities near San Francisco with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



