California · San Francisco

Ivy at Golden Gate, the.

RCFE168 bedsDementia-trained staff(415) 664-6264
Facility · San Francisco
A 168-bed RCFE with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
168
Last inspection
Apr 2026
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
68th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
92nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Ivy at Golden Gate, the has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Ivy at Golden Gate, the's record and state requirements.

01 /

The facility has 1 serious citation on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

Six complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The most recent inspection was conducted on April 9, 2026 — can you provide the deficiency notice from that visit and walk families through any corrective actions implemented since that date?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

14 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

14
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
1
severe (Type A)
2026-04-09
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On April 1st, a resident's wandering alert device was triggered at an emergency exit, and staff found the resident near the front entrance about four minutes later. The facility reported this incident to the state and has since assigned a private companion to stay with the resident 24 hours a day. The state conducted a follow-up visit on April 9th to review what happened and discuss the facility's response with management.

Read raw inspector notes

On 04/09/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident report that was submitted to CCLD on 04/02/2026. LPA met with Administrator, Adiam Welday. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility submitted a written incident report stating that on 04/01/2026, at approximately 4:06 PM, R1’s WanderGuard device activated at an emergency exit. Staff were immediately alerted, initiated a search, and located R1 near the front entrance at approximately 4:10 PM. LPA conducted interviews, collected and reviewed documentation. Administrator reported that R1 is placed with 24 hours private companion until further notice. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

2026-04-01
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On April 1, 2026, state licensing staff made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with the administrator. The administrator confirmed that a staff member who had been involved in a previous matter is no longer employed at the facility. A copy of the report was provided to the administrator.

Read raw inspector notes

On April 1, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit. LPA met with administrator, Adiam Welday and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit, the administrator confirmed that staff #1 (S1) is no longer working at the facility and has been disassociated from the facility. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

2026-02-19
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On February 19, 2026, licensing staff visited the facility to review a self-reported incident in which a resident became agitated during a meal, threatened staff, and required police assistance. The facility had reported the incident 10 days after it occurred, when state rules require reporting within 7 days; staff provided guidance on how to meet this requirement going forward. No violations were cited, and the resident has since been evaluated by a doctor with no additional incidents reported.

Read raw inspector notes

On 2/19/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct a Case Management visit in regards to an incident self reported by the facility involving a resident who became agitated during meal time, and threatened staff. LPA Calandra was greeted by Adiam Welday, Executive Director/Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. According to the Administrator, R1 entered the kitchen of the memory care unit and threatened staff. Staff attempted to redirect the resident but R1 became more aggressive and the police department had to be contacted. R1 has been to the doctor recently and re-evaluated. No other incidents have been reported at this time. During the visit, LPA received copies of R1's recent assessment and discharge notes. During record review, LPA observed that the incident had not been reported to the Department for 10 days. Licensees are required per Title 22 to submit a written report within 7 days of the occurrence. A Technical Assistance Advisory note was provided explaining the best practice to maintain compliance. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report and Technical Assistance were provided.

2025-12-23
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On December 23, 2025, state licensing staff conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a report from December 17 about a resident's family member claiming that personal items were missing from the resident's room. Staff were interviewed and documentation was reviewed, though no photographs or documented values of the items were available at the time the facility reported the incident. The resident was hospitalized at the time of the investigation.

Read raw inspector notes

On 12/23/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident report. LPA met with Executive Director, Adiam Welday, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On 12/17/25 , the facility reported that a resident’s family member alleged missing personal property from the resident’s room at the facility. No photographs or documented values of the items were available at the time of the report. At the time of the visit, the resident was hospitalized and undergoing treatment . The LPA interviewed staff and collected relevant documentation . The LPA reviewed the report with the Executive Director , and a copy of the report was provided to the Executive Director .

2025-12-03
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On December 3, 2025, licensing staff visited the facility to investigate an incident from November 25 where a resident left the facility unassisted through a gated outdoor area and was found four hours later with no injuries. Staff confirmed that all door alarms and delayed egress systems were working properly, and the resident's physician assessment indicated the resident was not considered a wandering risk. No violations were found.

Read raw inspector notes

On 12/3/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct a Case Management visit in regards to an incident that occurred on 11/25/2025 in which a resident, R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA Calandra was greeted by Sayma Arnautovich, Director of Housekeeping an and explained the purpose of the visit. Daisy Dizon, Director of Memory Care arrived later during the visit. According to Sayma Arnautovich, Director of Housekeeping, R1 lives in a memory care apartment and frequently takes walks outside of the community in a gated outdoor space. On 11/22/2025, R1 walked out of their apartment and walked towards a gated outside space. From there R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted and was found four hours later by staff with no apparent injuries when they returned to the facility front steps. Based on observations, and interview, all door alarms and delayed egress systems were working properly. LPA requested a copy of R1's LIC 602 Physician's report. According to the medical assessment which was dated last year, R1 is not at risk if allowed to leave the community unsupervised due to dementia or cognitive decline and is not a wander risk. LPA received a copy of the physician's report and last doctor's visit record during the visit. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report along was provided.

2025-10-08
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

A licensing analyst visited this facility on October 8, 2025, to follow up on an incident from September 27, 2025, when a resident with Alzheimer's dementia left the facility unattended during a morning walk and did not return until 5:00 PM that evening when brought back by someone from outside. The facility's staff member was unaware the resident required assistance before leaving the building, and the facility was cited for inadequate supervision and care. The facility was notified of deficiencies and told that failure to correct them could result in civil penalties.

Type A22 CCR §87464(f)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87464(f)

Based on file review and incident report, Licensee did not provide care and supervision to resident R1 who is diagnosed with Dementia. R1 eloped from facility without supervision, with documented mental condition stated not able to leave facility unassisted.

Read raw inspector notes

On 10/08/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident report that was submitted to CCLD on 10/03/2025. LPA met with Memory Care Director, Daisy Dizon, and Regional Operations Specialist, Caroline Frangieh, arrived later during the visit. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility submitted a written incident report indicating on 09/27/2025, at approximately 9:30 AM, Resident R1 participated in a morning walk accompanied by activity staff S1 and other residents. S1 was unaware that Resident R1 was not to leave the facility without assistance. Staff S1 returned to the facility without Resident R1. At app roximately 5:00 PM the same day, Resident R1 returned to the facility accompanied by an individual from outside the facility. Resident R1’s physician’s report identifies Alzheimer’s dementia as the primary diagnosis. The resident’s mental status indicates that R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. Due to lack of care and supervision by facility staff, R1 was able to elope from the facility. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with the Regional Operations Specialist, and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

2025-08-22
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced annual inspection on August 22, 2025, the facility was found clean and well-maintained, with proper safety equipment including fire extinguishers, carbon monoxide detectors, and smoke detectors throughout, and water temperature, food storage, and medication management all meeting requirements. Staff records and resident records were complete and up to date, cleaning supplies were safely locked away, and residents were engaged in activities or in common areas. No deficiencies were cited.

Read raw inspector notes

On 8/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced Annual inspection visit. LPA met with Regional Operations Specialist, Chris Schuster and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the facility with Director of Housekeeping, Sayma Arnautovich, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Residents are either engaged in activities or are in the tea rooms or dining area. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located on each resident floor and kitchen. Carbon monoxide detectors were located at each hallway. Smoke detectors and fire safety systems are interconnected. Water at faucets accessible to residents measured at 110 degF. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods. Facility provides a wide variety of meal preferences and preparation while also ensuring proper dietary restrictions are followed. Cleaning supplies and other toxins are safely stored in locked closets throughout each floor, and housekeeping/maintenance rooms all of which were secured upon inspection. All resident’s bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. Seven resident records and seven staff records were reviewed. All records are complete and updated. Staff has annual training logs. Medication room was reviewed and everything is complete and locked in the med room. No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.

2025-06-05
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

An investigator looked into a complaint that a resident's care needs weren't being met. After reviewing the resident's medical records and interviewing the resident, family members, and staff, the investigator found no evidence to support the complaint. No violations were cited.

Read raw inspector notes

Based upon review of R1’s physician’s report, R1 is cognitively able to determine their own medical and assistance needs. Interviews with residents (R1, R2), responsible party (I1) and witness (I2) indicated the facility is providing appropriate care and meeting resident needs with no concerns indicated. A finding that the complaint allegation client's care needs not met by staff is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiency cited.

2025-05-02
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that staff failed to give medications as prescribed, didn't keep current resident records, and didn't communicate with the resident's family about care. The inspector reviewed medication records and found they were properly maintained on file, and found documented communication between the facility and the family; the complaint allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

Read raw inspector notes

Staff did not maintain current resident records. LPA conducted a review of R1’s records and found that the facility had maintained R1’s medication records. Upon additional interview with Reporting Party, LPA received contradicting information to the initial complaint intake statement. LPA was not provided specific information on medication record issues by Reporting Party. Upon review of R1's medication records, LPA found that R1's medication administering records were on file. Staff are not communicating with responsible party regarding resident's care service. Upon interview with Executive Director, and corresponding documented communication with R1’s, responsible party, it was determined that there was documented communication from the facility regarding R1's care service. From documentation gathered, LPA found contradicting information in relation to the allegation. A finding that the complaint allegations, staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed, staff did not maintain current resident records and staff are not communicating with responsible party regarding resident's care service are unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.

2024-12-10
Complaint Investigation
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that two residents were owed full refunds because they never physically moved in, but an investigation found the residents had signed admission agreements effective July 31, 2024, and were able to move in but chose not to—they later requested withdrawal in August and September 2024. The facility provided the appropriate pro-rated refund for the fees paid, consistent with the signed agreement. No violations were found.

Read raw inspector notes

Reporting Party claims that all expenses are owed to residents (R1 & R2) because neither resident had not physically moved into the facility. Based upon interviews with staff (S1) and outside parties (I1,I2), LPA found that R1 & R2 had a signed effective agreement and were able to move into the facility as of 7/31/2024. However, it was found that R1 & R2 voluntarily refused to move their belongings into the facility from their personal home with said effective agreement and paid community and rent fees. Lastly, document review also indicated that R1 & R2 had submitted a withdrawal letter dated 8/30/2024 to the facility however was unsigned. A second letter was submitted to the facility dated 9/2/2024 declared an outside party (I1) as residents' (R1 & R2) authorized representative. A final letter from I1 dated 9/6/2024, requested a full refund of fees. Although LPA found that the facility received inconsistent documentation for withdrawal, a request was initially submitted by residents' (R1 & R2) within the first month of rent. Again it is indicated on the signed admissions agreement, that R1 & R2 had agreed to facility admission, effective 7/31/2024 and are not owed the alleged amount. In consideration to time frame of withdrawals, the facility was found to have provided the appropriate pro-rated community fees refund amount to residents (R1 & R2). The agency has investigated the allegation and we have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited during today's visit.

2024-12-04
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Citation on file
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility did not follow its own refund policy when a resident moved out. The resident's belongings were removed on July 27, 2024, but the facility did not issue a full refund of monthly fees until October 9, 2024—more than two months later, contrary to the admissions agreement that promised refunds within 21 days. The state substantiated this violation.

Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.

Read raw inspector notes

The admissions agreement regarding refunds continues indicating, " within twenty-one (21) days after the Residence has been vacated, your property has been removed from the Residence, and the Residence has been restored to its original clean condition, we will pay you a refund equal to any unused portion of your final Monthly Fee and Level of Care Fee..". Based upon interviews with staff (S2) it was found that the facility had refunded the level of care fees to R1 but had not yet refunded the monthly fees. It was found that R1's belongings had been moved out of the facility by 7/27/2024 but had not been fully refunded including the monthly fees until 10/9/2024 which goes against R1's admissions agreement. Allegation, facility did not issue refund is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided.

2024-08-21
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection on August 21, 2024, and the facility passed with no violations. Inspectors found the facility clean and safe, with proper food storage and supplies, working fire safety systems, secure storage of hazardous materials, and staff actively engaged with residents through activities and personalized care.

Read raw inspector notes

On 8/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection for this facility and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. The facility currently provides care for 127 residents, 6 of which are receiving hospice services, along with a designated memory care unit. LPA continued with a tour of the facility with staff, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located on each resident floor and kitchen were found to be last charged on 11/8/2023. Carbon monoxide detectors were located at each hallway tested and functioning. Smoke detectors and fire safety systems are interconnected. Fire Safety Inspection was completed on 8/16/2024 indicating all fire safety devices and systems to be in order. Water at faucets accessible to residents measured between 105.3 and 114.4 degrees F which is within regulation. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations, with food stored in the kitchen, sufficient for residents in care. Food supply is replenished twice per week and stored properly. Facility provides a wide variety of meal preferences and preparation while also ensuring proper dietary restrictions are followed. Cleaning supplies and other toxins are safely stored in locked closets throughout each floor, and housekeeping/maintenance rooms all of which were secured upon inspection. There was a supply of hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All resident’s bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. Residents that were awake during the inspection were observed interacting with staff, fellow residents and visitors in the common areas, or in their bedrooms resting. The facility encourages regular family visits and utilizes a wide variety of activities with LPA observing staff engaging continuously with residents, offering activities based on individualized preferences and abilities. LPA found that staff and resident engagement is well practiced with activity calendars developed on a monthly basis. Residents were observed to have a positive and personable relationship with staff and Executive Director. There are multiple outdoor patios for resident use, all equipped with appropriate shading Continued onto LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA conducted a sample file review for 10 residents and found all items to be in order. Upon a spot check of five (5) staff files, LPA found that caregiver staff have current 1st aid and CPR and annual training completed. Lastly, A spot check of medications in both assisted living and memory care was conducted and found that all medication counts and records are in order. Katherine Raukhman's Administrator Certificat e 7007732740 is currently active through 12/26/2024. LPA requested the following documents be sent to CCL by COB 9/4/2024: LIC 308 Designated Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during today's visit.

2024-05-23
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

A state licensing official made an unannounced visit on May 23, 2024, and issued an exclusion order preventing a private companion from working at the facility. The Executive Director was notified in person and received written documentation of the exclusion. The reason for the exclusion is not detailed in this report.

Read raw inspector notes

On May 23, 2024, at 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) John Calandra conducted an unannounced visit. LPA Calandra met with Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman and explained the purpose of today’s visit. LPA Calandra delivered an immediate exclusion letter to exclude a private companion who worked in the facility before. The private companion is not on shift today and the Executive Director was advised that they are not allowed to work in the facility. The letter was given to and reviewed by the Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. This report is reviewed and discussed, and a copy is provided.

2023-08-02
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

This was a pre-licensing inspection of a new four-story facility with assisted living on all floors and a secure memory care unit on the first floor. The inspector found the building to be clean and well-maintained, with proper safety features including grab bars, pull alarm systems, secure medication storage, and locked chemicals; water temperatures, refrigeration, and other equipment were all within standards. The facility was found to comply with state regulations and the inspector recommended approval for licensure.

Read raw inspector notes

On August 2, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced Pre-Licensing visit. LPA met with Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds. Indoor and the outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. This is a 4 story facility; Assisted Living on all floors and secure locked Memory Care neighborhood on the first floor. Bedrooms observed during the tour were equipped with sufficient lighting, required furniture, non-skid mats, grab-bars and pull alarm systems. Communal bathrooms observed were clean and free from odor. Water temperatures throughout the facility was measured at 112-113F on each floor. Laundry rooms utilized by residents were located on the 2nd-4th floor. Main laundry room for staff is located on the first floor. Chemicals and toxins were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The first-aid kit is inspected and complete. Living room and dining room was observed to be comfortable and free from tripping hazards. Comfortable temperature is maintained throughout the facility and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Hallway lights remain on at all hours of the day. Extra linen was observed on the 4th floor. LPA toured the the kitchen and observed it to be clean and sanitary. Facility refrigerator temperatures are within regulatory standards. Dry goods/emergency food supplies are stored on the first floor. LPA observed 2 medication rooms on the first floor; one on the Assisted Living side and one in the Memory Care neighborhood. A random sampling of resident and staff records is conducted. All required records are maintained. Required posting are posted on the main floor. Facility is overall clean and in good repair based on observations made today. Facility is in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Comp III orientation was given to the Administrator. Immediate Licensure is recommended pending final approval from the Central Applications Bureau. Report is reviewed with Executive Director and a copy is provided.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Same operator group

Other facilities under this operator

Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc — as recorded on state license extracts. Each facility still has its own inspection history.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.