StarlynnCare

California · San Francisco

Kokoro Assisted Living

RCFE · Memory Care

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive help with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and medication management. An RCFE with a Memory Care designation is additionally required by California Title 22 (§87705 and §87706) to provide specialized staff training in dementia care, individualized care plans for residents with cognitive impairment, and appropriate supervision protocols — requirements that go beyond a standard RCFE license.

1881 Bush St · San Francisco, 94109

Quick facts

Licensed beds61
Memory careYes
Last inspectionNov 2025
Last citationOct 2024
Operated byKokoro Assited Living Inc; Ncp Senior Ventures Llc
Map showing location of Kokoro Assisted Living

Inspection comparison

Updated May 1, 2026

Compared to 56 California RCFE memory care facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Peer comparison

Percentile vs 56 similar California CA / rcfe_memory_care / large beds facilities · higher = better

Severity
78th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
82th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median

Citation severity over time

↓ improving

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

Jun 24peer medianMay 26

Weighted score (24mo)

3

Last citation

Oct 24

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLGHID1EFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.Rules this facility has been cited for are shown first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?Cited Oct 202422 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625

Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:

  • 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
  • 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
  • Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.

Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 61 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver must be on duty, plus one additional caregiver on call who can respond within 10 minutes.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

Questions to ask on your tour

Based on Kokoro Assisted Living's state inspection record.

  1. The facility has one dementia-care citation on file under §87705 or §87706 — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

  2. Seven complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

  3. The November 10, 2025 inspection resulted in deficiencies — can you provide documentation showing how each deficiency was corrected?

  4. California Title 22 §87705 requires a written dementia care program — can you provide that program document for prospective families to review?

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
385600235
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
61
Operator
Kokoro Assited Living Inc; Ncp Senior Ventures Llc

Inspections & citations

14

reports on file

5

total deficiencies

1

dementia-care citations

Other visitNovember 10, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

InspectionOctober 3, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On October 3, 2025, a state licensing analyst visited the facility to review a change in management application and collected required documentation. No deficiencies were found during this visit. The facility was notified that a new administrator cannot start until the state completes its review of the management change application.

View full inspector notes

On 10/3/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility, to conduct a Case Management in regards to a Change in Management application. LPA was greeted by Angie Esplana, Business Office Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Calandra spoke with the Operations Specialist, Jessica Quintana and Trevor Ogden regarding the Change in Management. A Change in Administrator will not occur until the Change in Management application has been processed by the Centralized Applications Bureau(CAB) unit. During the visit, LPA collected the facility's current LIC 500. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report left emailed to facility representative.

InspectionSeptember 22, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On September 22, 2025, inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection and found the facility clean, safe, and well-maintained, with proper fire safety equipment, adequate food and supplies, and secure storage of cleaning products and medications. Two minor documentation issues were noted: the facility did not have written records showing that one resident refused a medical assessment, and the first quarterly emergency drill was not documented. No other deficiencies were found.

View full inspector notes

On 09/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jian conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection for this facility and was greeted by Staff, Julia Webb. Administrator, Chantelle Hudson & Business Office Director, Angie Esplana joined later during the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the facility with staff, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located on each resident floor, kitchen and common spaces were found to be charged. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire safety systems were present and recently serviced by fire inspection agency. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required, with food stored in the kitchen, sufficient for residents in care. Food supply is replenished constantly throughout the week and stored properly. Administrator stated no resident requested special diet. Cleaning supplies and other toxins are safely stored in locked closets throughout each floor, and housekeeping carts all of which were secured upon inspection. There was a supply of hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All resident’s bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. Each stairwell exit is unlocked but has a auditory alarm when opened. Residents that were out in the community during the inspection were observed interacting with staff, fellow residents and visitors in the common areas. There is a single outdoor patio for resident use, all equipped with appropriate shading. Technical Violation issued for lack of documentation of one resident's refusal of annual medical assessment visit and technical violation issued for lack of documentation for the first quarterly emergency drill. A spot check of medications including narcotic was conducted and found that all medication counts and records to be in order. No deficiencies were cited. The report was reviewed and discussed with Administrator and Business Office Director. A copy of the report was left at the facility.

Other visitOctober 10, 2024Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection on October 10, 2024, where inspectors found the facility clean and well-maintained with proper fire safety equipment, adequate food and supplies, and residents actively engaged in activities and community outings. A maintenance cart with power tools was found unsecured in a stairwell, but staff immediately removed and locked it away when discovered. The facility was cited for incomplete staff training records, with a deadline to submit proof of completion by November 6, 2024.

View full inspector notes

On 10/10/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection for this facility and was greeted by Executive Director, Chantelle Hudson & Business Office Director, Angie Esplana. The facility currently provides care for 46 residents, 2 of which are receiving hospice services and some of which with a diagnosis of dementia. LPA continued with a tour of the facility with staff, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located on each resident floor, kitchen and common spaces were found to be charged. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire safety systems were present and recently serviced by fire inspection agency. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required, with food stored in the kitchen, sufficient for residents in care. Food supply is replenished constantly throughout the week and stored properly. Facility provides a wide variety of meal preferences and preparation while also ensuring proper dietary restrictions are followed. Cleaning supplies and other toxins are safely stored in locked closets throughout each floor, and housekeeping carts all of which were secured upon inspection. There was a supply of hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All resident’s bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. During inspection LPA observed a maintenance cart containing power tools and other items that could pose potential safety risk located in the 5th floor stairwell. Each stairwell exit is unlocked but has a auditory alarm when opened. No residents were observed on the floor or near the maintenance cart when found. Maintenance staff immediately removed and secured items. Residents that were out in the community during the inspection were observed interacting with staff, fellow residents and visitors in the common areas. The facility encourages regular family visits and utilizes a variety of activities with LPA observing residents utilizing activity spaces and items. There is a single outdoor patio for resident use, all equipped with appropriate shading Continued onto LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA conducted a sample file review for residents and found all items to be in order including needs & service plans and physician's reports. Upon a spot check of staff files, LPA found that caregiver staff have current 1st aid and CPR completed. Executive Director and Business Office Manager are currently in progress to complete all staff annual training records. Facility utilizes Allen Flores approved training vendor with training records currently over 50% completed. Executive Director agreed to provide proof of completion for all required training by 11/6/2024. Technical Violation issued. Lastly, A spot check of medications including narcotic was conducted and found that all medication counts and records to be in order. Chantelle Hudson's Administrator Certificate is currently active through 7/17/2025. LPA requested the following documents be sent to CCL by COB 10/24/2024: LIC 308 Designated Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance Deficiency cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.

Type BCCR §87705(f)(1)

Regulation

(f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (1) Knives, matches, firearms, tools and other items that could constitute a danger to the resident(s).

Inspector finding

Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 of 1 maintenance cart containing powertools and other potentially dangerous items to residents with dementia, accessible in facility stairwell adjacent to resident bedrooms, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/10/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee failed to ensure items that could constitute danger to residents were kept secured and ina…

Other visitMarch 12, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: John Calandra

Plain-language summary

On March 12, 2024, a state licensing analyst made an unannounced visit to assess a resident for whom the facility had requested a total care exception. The analyst observed the resident during an appointment and at lunch and found no deficiencies. The facility's request was reviewed with the executive director.

View full inspector notes

On March 12, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 10:57 AM to conduct an unnanounced Case Management visit to assess a resident (R1), the facility had submitted a total care exception request for. LPA Calandra met with Naoko Jones, Executive Director and explained the purpose of his visit. LPA Calandra observed R1 during a pre-scheduled appointment and while R1 eating lunch in the common dining room with a member of the care staff. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Naoko Jones, Executive Director and a copy of the report left at the facility.

InspectionMarch 8, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: John Calandra

Plain-language summary

A state inspector visited the facility on March 8, 2024, to evaluate whether a resident required a higher level of care than the facility was licensed to provide. The inspector interviewed the resident and staff but found no violations during this unannounced visit, which the state plans to continue at a later date.

View full inspector notes

On March 8, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 1:40 PM to conduct an unnanounced Case Management visit in regards to an Exception request submitted by the facility for a resident who the facility believes needs total care. LPA Calandra met with Angelina Esplana, Director of Marketing and Administration and explained the purpose of his visit. Executive Director, Naoko Jones and Sakae Hamilton, Director of Resident Care were off and unable to join the visit. LPA Calandra met and interviewed R1 to assess the resident. Further details can be found on the 812. LPA Calandra also interviewed staff tasked with caring for R1. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This visit will be continued at a later date. The report was reviewed with Angelina Esplana, Director of Marketing and Administration and a copy of the report left at the facility.

ComplaintApril 7, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Audrey Jeung

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

InspectionOctober 11, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A routine annual inspection was conducted on October 11, 2022, and found no violations. The inspector observed that the facility had appropriate infection control measures in place, working emergency call systems in resident apartments, safe storage of medications and supplies, proper food storage temperatures, and adequate first-aid equipment and personal protective equipment.

View full inspector notes

On 10/11/2022, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA observed COVID-19 signs posted by the entrance. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Naoko Jones. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and LPA was screened at the front entrance. The Director of Marketing and Administration provided a toured of the facility and grounds. This is a 6 story facility with resident apartments on all floors with 2 apartments reserved on the 1st floor for isolation purpose. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, daily screening records for staff, residents and visitors and staff training and policies. During the tour, LPA observed resident apartments are equipped with emergency call system next to the bed and the bathroom which can be activated from bedroom and bathroom and residents also wear a call pendant. LPA observed bathrooms are equipped with soap and paper towels, and hand washing instruction is posted by the hand washing stations. COVID-19 signs are posted through-out the facility, in the elevators and hand sanitizer stations/dispensers installed by the elevator. PPE supply is adequate and stored on the 5th floor. Residents are observed wearing face masks and maintaining social distancing during activities. Kitchen and food supplies are inspected. LPA observed refrigerator temperature measured at 28 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and freezer measured at -1 degree F. First-aid kit is inspected and complete. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to resident, a comfortable temperature is maintained, lighting is sufficient for comfort and safety. The following updated licensing forms or information are requested to be submitted to CCLD BY 10/13/22: LIC309 (Administrative Responsibility and LIC 308 (Designation of Administrative Responsibility). No deficiency cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator. A copy is provided.

ComplaintOctober 12, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection conducted on October 12, 2021. The inspector found the facility had proper COVID-19 safety measures in place, including isolation apartments, adequate personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies, staff training records, and appropriate medication storage, with no violations noted.

View full inspector notes

On 10/12/2021, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA observed COVID-19 signs posted by the entrance. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Naoko Jones. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and LPA was screened at the front entrance. The Administrator and the Resident Service Director provided a toured of the facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, staff randomly testing records, resident and staff daily monitoring records, containment strategies (facility has reserved 2 private apartments with their own bathrooms and shower rooms on the first floor for isolation. quarantine purposes), PPE supply (the staff conducts weekly inventory count and the Resident Service Director orders the supplies accordingly on a weekly basis) and the environmental cleaning supply are adequate, bathrooms are equipped with soap and paper towels, and hand washing instruction is posted by the hand washing stations. Signs are posted through-out the facility. Residents are observed to be wearing face masks and maintaining social distancing during activities and meals. There are COVID-19 signs posted inside and outside of the elevator and hand sanitizer station outside. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to resident, a comfortable temperature is maintained, lighting is sufficient for comfort and safety No deficiency cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator and the Resident Service Director. A copy is provided.

ComplaintOctober 12, 2021· SubstantiatedType B
3 deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility arranged for an outside assessment of a resident without notifying the family representative and failed to respond promptly to the representative's emails requesting medical records and documents. The facility acknowledged these failures during interviews. The facility must correct these deficiencies or may face civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

Regarding the allegation of: representative was not regularly informed of activities related to care or services, including ongoing evaluations, as appropriate to resident's needs, the facility acknowledged of making arrangements with an outside Consulting Group to conduct an on-site assessment for R1 without notifying the Responsible Party. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed substantiated. Regarding the allegation of: communications from the representative were not answered promptly and appropriately, the Reporting Party stated that the Responsible Party emailed the facility some questions regarding to R1 and R2 and requested for medical records, and documents but the facility failed to respond to the emails and has yet provided the information. During the interviews, the facility acknowledged that they failed to provide the entire medical records and documents to the Responsible Party and they failed to respond to some of the email inquires that the Responsible Party has asked for. After investigation, this allegation is deemed substantiated. Based on interviews and record reviews during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Administrator, and Appeal Rights provided.

Type BCCR §87506(c)(1)

Regulation

RESIDENT RECORDS- (c) All information and records obtained from or regarding residents shall be confidential. (1)The licensee shall be responsible..for safeguarding the confidentiality of their contents.The licensee...shall reveal or make available confidential information only upon the resident's written consent or that of his designated represent…

Inspector finding

This requirement was not met as evidenced by: the facility failed to obtain prior authorization from the Responisble Party for providinng resident's confidential information to an outside organization which posed potential health and safety risks to resident in care.

Type BCCR §87468.1(a)(8)

Regulation

PERSONAL RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS....(a)Residents in all residential care facilities....(8)To have their representatives regularly informed...activities related to care or services, including ongoing evaluations, as appropriate to their needs.

Inspector finding

This requirement was not met as evidenced by: the facility arranged for an outside consultant group to conduct an on-site assessment for R1 without informing the Responsible party which posed potential health and safety risks to resident in care.

Type BCCR §87468.1(a)(9)

Regulation

PERSONAL RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS....(a)Residents in all residential care facilities....(9) To have communications to the licensee from their representatives answered promptly and appropriately.

Inspector finding

This requirement was not met as evidenced by: the facility failed to provide R1 and R2's complete medical records and documents to the Reporting Party promptly as requested which posed potential health and safety risks to resident in care.

ComplaintJuly 22, 2021· SubstantiatedType B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that staff failed to promptly report a resident's significant weight loss to the resident's doctor—the resident lost over 10 pounds between January and December 2019, but the physician was not notified until January 2020 and did not see the resident until October 2020. The investigation also found that staff gave only verbal reports of a resident's fall to the person responsible for that resident, rather than providing written documentation as required. These findings were substantiated based on facility records and staff interviews.

View full inspector notes

According to facility records, Resident 4 (R4) had a weight of 145lbs on January 2019, 135lbs by October 2019, and was at 129.6lbs by December 2019. R4 had a 15.4lbs or 10.62% weight loss from January 2019 - December 2019. R4's physician was not informed of the weight loss until January 16, 2020 and was not seen by R4's physician until October 26, 2020. According to administrator, R4 didn't have any hospital visits for 2019. Regarding to staff failed to follow proper reporting requirements. According to facility records, Resident 1 (R1) had an unwitnessed mechanical fall on May 31, 2018 inside the apartment. According to staff interviews, S1 stated that incidents, such as resident falls, are reported in writing to Community Care Licensing and to the resident's physician. However, no written report is provided to the person responsible for the resident, only verbal report is given according to S1. The allegations were SUBSTANTIATED, meaning that the allegation was valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Executive Director and a copy is provided.

Type BCCR §87465(a)(1)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care... (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical... care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents.

Inspector finding

This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the licensee failed to arrange for medical care appropriate to R4's conditions and needs which poses potential health risks to residents in care.

ComplaintJuly 22, 2021· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation looked into five allegations: a resident falling, staff not changing soiled diapers promptly, a resident leaving the facility, staff not notifying family of incidents, and giving a resident a discontinued medication. The facility provided records showing continence care was documented regularly, the resident who left had signed out and back in, the fall was reported to the resident's representative, and the discontinued medication had not been given after its discontinuation date—and no violations were substantiated.

View full inspector notes

According to R1’s physician’s report, R1 is ambulatory and has no motor impairment. There was no special instruction in R1’s physician’s report for the facility to follow to prevent falls prior to incident. -- Staff leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended periods of time: According to administrator, continence care is provided to residents every 2 hours; hourly if a resident has a condition. Facility staff logs continence care provided in a chart inside the resident's apartment per administrator. According to facility records, continence care was provided to Resident 5 (R5) regularly for June 2019, as documented by facility staff. -- Staff was unable to locate a resident while in care: According to records review conducted, on August 23, 2019, CCL unsubstantiated a complaint allegation that Resident 4 (R4) left the facility unauthorized. According to R4’s physician’s report, R4 was able to leave the facility unattended, can communicate needs and follow instructions. According to facility records, R4 signed out prior to leaving the facility and signed in upon return. -- Staff failed to notify authorized representative of residents incidents: According to staff interviews, S1 stated that the person responsible for the resident is notified of incidents verbally. According to facility records, the May 31, 2018 fall incident was reported to the person responsible for the resident as documented by facility staff. -- Staff administered discontinued medication to a resident: According to Physicians Orders dated March 13, 2019, the medication FUROSEMIDE (aka LASIX) 40 mg is to be discontinued for R2. According to facility records, this medication was last administered to R2 around noon of March 2, 2019, as documented by facility staff. The allegations were deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.

ComplaintJuly 22, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

An investigator looked into a complaint that the facility wasn't conducting emergency preparedness drills. The investigation found no violation—the facility is conducting these drills as required. The complaint was dismissed.

View full inspector notes

This agency has investigated the complaint alleging facility failed to conduct emergency preparedness drills. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.

ComplaintMay 12, 2021· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found no evidence that the facility was failing to provide appropriate eating utensils to residents. Staff reported that most residents prefer chopsticks and have not complained about utensil availability, and residents confirmed during interviews that they get the utensils they want.

View full inspector notes

In addition, the staff members reported that most of the residents prefer chopsticks and they have not gotten any complaints from the residents regarding not having plastic utensils. During the interview with the residents, they validated that they prefer chopsticks over other utensils and one of them stated, " I always get what I want". Base on record review and interviews during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with the facility's Administrator over the phone. The facility Administrator will receive this LIC9099 report through email to sign and email it back to LPA Han.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to San Francisco

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.