California · North Highlands

Legacy Senior Care II.

RCFE6 bedsDementia-trained staff(916) 701-7737
Peer rank
Top 42% of California memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · North Highlands
A 6-bed RCFE with 8 citations on file.
Licensed beds
6
Last inspection
Jun 2026
Last citation
Feb 2026
Operated by
Legacy Senior Care LLC
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Approximate location
Peer Comparison

Compared to 68 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
19th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
54th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
Cited Jan 2026+
Plain language

Elopements, fires, epidemic outbreaks, and poisonings must be reported immediately. Abuse with serious bodily injury requires a 2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report to CDSS, Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement. Abuse without serious bodily injury must be reported within 24 hours. A resident death requires a phone call by the next working day and a written report within 7 days. Injuries requiring medical treatment beyond first aid, and bankruptcy/foreclosure/utility shutoff notices, must also be reported. Incidents not reported on time are a separate violation — families may file a complaint directly with CDSS.

Ask on tour

When was the last incident report filed with CDSS, and may I see your incident log summary for the past 12 months?

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

19 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

19
reports on file
8
total deficiencies
3
severe (Type A)
2026-06-16
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Bethany Mirlohi

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Legacy Senior Care II, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

Read raw inspector notes

In addition, resident has not observed individuals selling drugs to other residents. LPA toured the facility and did not observe drug paraphernalia, and no one seemed under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Due to the information gathered, the department finds allegation unfounded. The department investigated allegation, “Staff are allowing residents to consume illegal drugs.” The department interviewed residents and staff and toured the facility. During interviews with residents, it was reported they have not observed resident’s taking drugs or possessing drug paraphernalia. LPA toured the facility and did not observe drug paraphernalia, and no one seemed under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Due to the information gathered, the department finds allegation unfounded. The allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA spoke to a fire department representative and reviewed incident calls at the facility address. Representative stated there were no calls of service in April 2026. However, in March 2026, there was one call that occurred at 3:30 AM in which R1 fell and called 911 themselves. It was documented that when the fire department personnel arrived, R1 was accompanied by a caregiver and a housemate. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and copy of report provided.

2026-05-13
Complaint Investigation
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with caregiver Adilina Tuiloma during today's visit. Upon arrival there was 1 caregiver available until 10 am when a 2nd caregiver arrived. During today's inspection LPA toured the facility and observed resident rooms, common areas, kitchen, outdoor area, and staff area. LPA reviewed 6 of 6 resident files. LPA reviewed 6 of 6 resident medications comparing with physician orders and current MARS. During today's visit, no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted.

2026-04-15
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)s Hiratsuka and Mikkelson, conducted this announced annual visit. LPAs toured with Caregiver Manoa Namusudroka. Administrator Adilina Tuiloma arrived during visit. This facility currently has five residents. There are two shared and two private resident rooms. There is one full shared bathroom and one full bathroom in one of the shared resident rooms. A couple of resident rooms have exits to the outside. There is a locked laundry room and a staff room that is located by the kitchen. The dining, common, and kitchen areas were clean during this visit. There are two sheds in the backyard that are used for storage. There is a locked closet for medications and files. There are locked cabinets for cleaning toxins and sharps. Five of five resident records were reviewed. Six staff files were reviewed. Discussed with Administrator is logging of staff training. The staff do have training but some have logs that have dates, times, topics, and the length of time and some just have the training topics with the sheets signed. Staff do have training, but the logs are required to have the dates, times, topics, and length of time. The front gate was discussed. The gate is able to be opened but it can be difficult. Administrator stated she contacted a maintenance person and landlord about the gate to get it fixed or replaced. LPAs discussed leaving it partially open during the day time hours and close it at night without locking the gate. Resident supervision and audio alerts were discussed. Several other topics were discussed. No deficiencies cited.

2026-04-15
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Cassandra Mikkelson
Read raw inspector notes

The facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility. Documents reviewed indicated that all staff present at the facility and currently listed on the staff roster are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Interviews conducted with Administrator indicated that there are no uncleared staff at the facility and Administrator explained how she conducts hiring and fingerprinting staff prior to start date at the facility. Therefore, the allegation the facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility is unfounded. Staff are forging resident documents. Documents reviewed indicated that all physician signatures were from separate physicians and matched other signatures in each resident specific files. All resident files included all documents to meet regulatory requirements. In review of the staff files, signatures and printed names matched each staff file. Therefore, the allegation staff are forging resident documents is unfounded. The Administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time. Observations made on unannounced visits by the Department made on 01/08/2026 and 11/04/2025 which indicated that the facility’s administrator was present at the facility. Documents reviewed indicated that a current staff schedule is being followed and is accurate to current staff working. Therefore, the allegation the administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time is unfounded. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. Copy of report was given to facility.

2026-04-15
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Cassandra Mikkelson
Read raw inspector notes

Insufficient staffing Records reviewed indicated that staff have adequate training. Review of staff schedule indicated that there are staff scheduled to work to meet the residents in care needs. Interviews with Administrator, staff and residents indicated that staff are able to complete their daily tasks and assist all residents in care with their needs. Therefore, the allegation insufficient staffing is unsubstantiated. Facility is not arranging transportation to doctors appointments Interviews conducted indicated that administrator was assisting in scheduling transportation for doctors appointments. There were a handful of times that the third party transport company cancelled last minute causing the resident to miss their scheduled appointment. Administrator or facility staff are able to assist with taking residents to their appointments. Therefore, the allegation facility is not arranging transportation to doctors appointments is unsubstantiated. Medication mismanagement Records reviewed indicated that sodium tablets were prescribed but then discontinued in November 2025 by Resident R1’s primary care physician (PCP). Facility was using an updated medication list signed by R1's physician as reference to the medications given. Facility accurately discontinued the medications as requested by PCP. Interviews conducted indicated that resident R1 was willing and able to take their medications and does not have any refusals of medications. Therefore, the allegation medication mismanagement is unsubstantiated. Facility not providing a safe environment Records reviewed indicated that R1 and R3 were in a verbal altercation on 11/16/2025. No injuries were noted per incident report. Interviews indicated that staff are providing a safe environment for residents in care. Observations indicated that residents are safe and being taken care of by staff at the facility. Therefore, the allegation of facility not providing a safe environment is unsubstantiated. ** continued on 9099-C2 page** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Resident has wandered away from the facility Records indicated that there have not been any elopements from the facility. Resident R4 is considered an unsafe wandering risk but has not left the facility unattended while is care. Interviews conducted indicated that there have not been any elopements from the facility. Therefore, the allegation resident has wandered away from the facility is unsubstantiated. Resident's personal items were not safeguarded Interviews conducted indicated that when resident R1 moved out of the facility 02/03/2026, their personal belongings remained at the facility until 03/11/2026. On 03/11/2026, R1’s belongings were picked up, although one box was left behind by mistake. Therefore, the allegation resident's personal items were not safeguarded is unsubstantiated. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Facility does not have sufficient food Observations made indicated that facility has the required two day perishable and seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Meals are provided and portion sizes are adequate. Interviews conducted indicated that meals are served three times a day and residents can request secondary portions of meals if they would like. Therefore, the allegation facility does not have sufficient food is unfounded. Resident's personal items were not safeguarded Interviews conducted indicated that when resident R1 moved out of the facility 02/03/2026, their personal belongings remained at the facility until 03/11/2026. On 03/11/2026, R1’s belongings were picked up, although one box was left behind by mistake. R1’s family contacted administrator and requested the missing items and they were found and belongings were given back to R1 and their family. Therefore, the allegation resident’s personal items were not safeguarded is unfounded. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. Copy of report was given to facility.

2026-02-12
Other Visit
IJ · 2 findings
IJImmediate jeopardy22 CCR §87466
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87466

Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to notify R1's primary care physician of R1's change of condition as R1 was not eating as much and sleeping more, which poses an immediate risk for residents in care.

IJImmediate jeopardy22 CCR §87555(b)(7)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(7)

Based on file review and interviews conducted, Licensee failed to comply as R1 was ordered special diet of pureed textured, nectar thick consistency, fortified diet on May 19, 2025, but facility did not give R1's the followin special diet as R1 did not like it which poses an immediate risk for residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On February 12, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived at the facility to conduct a follow-up case management visit regarding LPA's visit conducted on January 8, 2026. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Staff contacted Administrator who informed LPA that she was unavailable to meet in person as she is occupied for an assessment at a different facility. During LPA's visit conducted on January 8, 2026, the visit was regarding a death report LPA received which was reported late to Community Care Licensing. Interview was conducted with Administrator on January 8, 2026, which revealed that R1 was observed to be declining for a "couple" of weeks. Observations was reported to R1's responsible party but not to R1's primary care physician. Additionally, file review was conducted which revealed that R1 is on a special diet of pureed textured nectar thick, but this special diet was not followed as R1 did not like the texture. Interview conducted with Administrator and staff conducted on January 8, 2026 revealed that day of R1's death, R1 was provided eggs and scrambled eggs for breakfast. It was discussed over the phone with Administrator when a resident has a change of condition it is to be documented and reported immediately to primary care physician. Additionally, it was discussed over the phone with Administrator that if a special diet was ordered by a physician, facility is to follow and/or report to physician if there is any concerns where the special diet cannot be met. As a result of today's visit, deficiencies were cited. Please see LIC 809-D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report and appeal rights provided.

2026-01-08
Other Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Type B22 CCR §87211(a)(1)(A)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87211(a)(1)(A)

Based on file review and interview, Licensee failed to comply as death report was not submited to Licensing until 11 days after occurrence, which poses a potential risk for residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cassie Yang and Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility to conduct a case management visit regarding an incident that LPAs were made aware of during LPAs' visit. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Upon LPAs' arrival, LPAs were informed that today's census was five (5) residents in care as resident (R1) had recently passed away in the month of December 2025. File review was conducted and observed that R1 was not on hospice services. Administrator stated death report was submitted but to the wrong regional office. LPA was provided a copy of R1's death report. File review revealed R1 passed away December 18, 2025 but death report was not submitted to Licensing until December 29, 2025. LPAs and Administrator discussed the importance of submitting death reports in a timely manner within the seven days of occurrence. At this time, this matter remains under review by the Department. Deficiencies cited. As this is a repeated violation, an additional $250 civil penalty has been assessed. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report and appeal rights provided.

2025-11-04
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

On November 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived at the facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During LPA's previous visit conducted on Thursday October 30, 2025, LPA removed R1's file from the facility to produce copies. Facility was informed file shall be returned within three business days. Today's visit, LPA returned R1’s complete file that was removed from the facility on Thursday, October 30, 2025. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted.

2025-10-30
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

On October 30, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit regarding an incident that occurred on October 9, 2025. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Today's visit, LPA was informed Administrator is unavailable due to an emergency. Today's visit, LPA obtained resident 's (R1) whole file. In accordance to: 87506 Resident Records (d) All resident records shall be available to the licensing agency to inspect, audit, and copy upon demand during normal business hours. Records may be removed if necessary for copying. Removal of records shall be subject to the following requirements: (3) Licensing representatives shall return the records undamaged and in good order within three business days following the date the records were removed. LPA may return R1's file within three business days by Tuesday November 4, 2025. This matter is still under review by the Department. Exit interview conducted.

2025-10-09
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Type A22 CCR §87303(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(a)

Based on observation, Licensee did not comply as it was observed that there was feces on the doors and walls, which poses a risk for residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On October 9, 2025, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Troy Ordonez and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with staff who then contacted Administrator who arrived to the facility. During today's visit, LPM and Administrator conducted a tour of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Storage space was inspected to confirm medications, toxins and sharps are locked and secured. LPM observed facility to be unsanitary as feces was observed to be on the the door and walls of the facility. LPA and LPM conducted a file review of residents in care and discussed the following concerns with Administrator. As a result of today's visit, deficiencies observed. Please see LIC 809-D. Copy of report and appeal rights provided during exit interview.

2025-09-25
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

A Non-Compliance Conference office meeting was held on September 25, 2025, at Sacramento Regional Office with the Licensee Adi Lina Tuiloma and facility representative Una Phyllis to discuss the deficiencies found at the facility and the actions needed to bring the facility into compliance with Title 22 regulations. Present in the meeting were Community Care Licensing (CCL) staff, including Regional Manager Alycia Rayner, Licensing Program Manager Troy Ordonez, Licensing Program Manager Laura Munoz, Licensing Program Manager Stephen Richardson, Licensing Program Analyst Cassie Yang, Licensing Program Analyst Cheyenne Ratajczak and Licensing Program Analyst Christina Valerio. During the meeting, CCL reviewed the facility’s history of citations, including Type A and Type B violations since April 2025. The citations involved issues such as fire safety, reporting requirements, resident records, administrator oversight, and reporting requirements. CCL stressed the importance of taking immediate corrective action to ensure resident safety and meet licensing requirements. CCL expressed concern about limited administrator oversight, including the administrator’s low on-site hours, unresponsiveness to calls, and insufficient supervision of staff. Staffing levels were also noted as a concern, with coverage gaps that could put residents at risk. The licensee agreed to take specific steps to fix these issues. These actions include making sure resident rooms meet licensed capacity, providing adequate staffing at all times, increasing administrator on-site hours or designating a qualified substitute, submitting personnel reports and supervision outlines, ensuring medications are available and administered on time, and conducting safety checks to secure chemicals and equipment. Please continue on LIC 809-C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LIC 809-C Licensee was provided a copy of Hospice Guide, Medication Guide, and Self-Assessment Guide. Additionally, CCL will submit a referral for technical support program. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.

2025-09-16
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

On September 16, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced to conduct a Plan of Correction visit regarding the deficiency cited on August 28, 2025. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. On August 28, 2025, it was observed that the facility’s fire door was left open for residents to pass by freely. The purpose of the fire door is to comply with 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE: 435.8.3.2 Group R-3.1 occupancies housing non-ambulatory clients: In a Group R-3.1 occupancy, bedrooms used by non-ambulatory clients shall have access to at least one of the required exits, which shall conform to one of the following: 1. Egress through a hallway or area into a bedroom in the immediate area which has an exit directly to the exterior and the corridor/hallway is constructed consistent with the dwelling unit interior walls . The hallway shall be separated from common areas by a solid wood door not less than 13/8 inch (35 mm) in thickness, maintained self-closing OR shall be automatic closing by actuation of a smoke detector installed in accordance with Section 716.5.9. 2. Egress through a hallway which has an exit directly to the exterior. The hallway shall be separated from the rest of the house by a wall constructed consistent with the dwelling unit interior walls and opening protected by a solid wood door not less than 13/8 inch (35 mm) in thickness, maintained self-closing or shall be automatic closing by actuation of a smoke detector installed in accordance with Section 716.5.9. 3. Direct exit from the bedroom to the exterior shall be of a size as to permit the installation of a door not less than 3 feet (914 mm) in width and not less than 6 feet 8 inches (2032 mm) in height. When installed, doors shall be capable of opening at least 90 degrees and shall be so mounted that the clear width of the exit way is not less than 32 inches (813 mm). 4. Egress through an adjoining bedroom which exits to the exterior. Please continue on LIC 809-C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LIC 809-C The plan of correction of Licensee is to submit a plan to LPA if facility wishes to install a magnetic door opener; if not, then Licensee needs to submit a plan of how facility will ensure fire door remains closed – was due on September 2, 2025. Additionally, LPA contacted Licensee on September 8, 2025 as a reminder that POC was due. As of the date of visit, LPA has not received plan of correction. Failure to correct civil penalty has been assessed of $100 per day. Civil penalty will continue to accrue $100 per day until plan of correction is received. Exit interview, a copy of report and appeal rights was provided.

2025-08-28
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

On August 28, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang conducted unannounced case management visit. LPA met with caregiver who stated Administrator is not at the facility at this time. When asked, LPA was informed Administrator has not been at the facility since last week. This visit is to deliver in-person of ORDER TO LICENSEE/FACILITY OF IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM FACILITY. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion and S1 is excluded and cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders the facility to remove S1 from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided on this date. A signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these forms.

2025-07-10
Other Visit
Type B · 3 findings
Type B22 CCR §87405(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87405(a)

Based on observation, Licensee did not comply to the section cited above as LPA contacted facility via phone call and email on July 7, July 8 and July 9 for R1's admission agreement to be submitted to the Department but did not receive a response, which poses a potential risk for residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87506(d)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87506(d)

Based on file review, Licensee failed to comply as LPA arrived to retrieve a copy of R1's admission agreement but file was unable to be relocated, which poses a potential risk for residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87211(a)(1)(A)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87211(a)(1)(A)

Based on file review, Licensee failed to comply as LPA did not received a death report for R1 who passed away over two weeks ago, which poses a risk for residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On July 10, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. Today's visit, LPA requested R1's admission agreement as LPA has requested for the document on three separate occasion via email and/or phone call. LPA was informed by staff that R1's file was missing. LPA was unable to retrieve a copy. LPA is requesting for Administrator to submit admission agreement if there is an electronic copy stored. LPA and Caregiver discussed that all records are to be centrally stored inaccessible to others and inactive records are to be kept for three years. LPA was informed R1 passed away two weeks ago. LPA did not receive LIC 624A Death Report for R1. Additionally, LPA was informed that Administrator visits the facility approximately every three weeks. Administrator was not present during today's visit. LPA reviewed resident charting notes and took one photo of the notes for June 22, 2025. Deficiencies cited. Exit interview and a copy of report and appeal rights was provided.

2025-05-20
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

On May 20 , 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Plan of Correction (POC) visit regarding two deficiencies that was cited on April 25, 2025. LPA met with caregiver who attempted to contact Administrator who was unavailable. Today's visit, LPA explained that POCs has not been received yet, copies of the report with deficiencies were emailed to Administrator's email on file on April 25, 2025 at 5:26 p.m. POC were due May 9, 2025. LPA informed caregiver that Licensee is to submit the POCs as soon as possible as civil penalties will continue to accrue. 87458 Medical Assessment - POC: Licensee is to conduct an audit of residents medical assessment to confirm tuberculosis testing are conducted. Licensee is to schedule residents an appointment for tuberculosis testing if missing on file. 87211 Reporting Requirements - POC: Licensee is to review the Reporting Requirement regulation and submit a statement of complian ce to LPA. POC may be submitted via fax and/or email to Sacramento North Regional Office at: Fax: 916-263-4808 Email: sacramentonorthregionalofficeascp@dss.ca.gov As a result of today's visit, civil penalties were assessed for $100 per day it has not been received. Exit interview and a copy of report and appeal rights provided.

2025-04-25
Other Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Type B22 CCR §87458(c)(1)(A)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87458(c)(1)(A)

Based on file review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as two out of five residents did not have tuberculosis testing documented on LIC602 which poses a potential risk for residents in care. POC Due Date: 05/09/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee is to conduct an audit of residents medical assessment to confirm tuberculosis testings are conducted. Licensee is to schedule residents an appointment for tuberculosis testing if missing on file. Licensee is to inform LPA once the following are completed by May 9, 2025.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a required annual inspection utilizing the CARE tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator informed LPA on the phone she was an hour away and unable to make it. LPA observed three residents in care with one resident on hospice services. LPA was informed two residents are at the hospital for evaluation. Facility census is compliance to license. Today's visit, LPA and staff conducted a tour of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to: four residents bedrooms, laundry room, staff room, kitchen and the common areas. LPA observed the common area to have the mandated compliance posters posted. LPA observed fire extinguisher to be recently serviced on November 5, 2024. Facility temperature was observed at a comfortable 72*F. LPA observed facility to have ample perishable and nonperishable food supply. LPA observed carbon monoxide detectors to be working and in good condition. Sharps are stored in staff room which was observed to be locked. LPA observed laundry room to be locked. Medications are stored in closet, locked and secured. Emergency Disaster Plan was observed to be reviewed and updated in 2024, pending review for 2025. File review conducted for five out of five residents in care. LPA observed R1 and R2's medical assessment present with no documentation of tuberculosis testing. As a result of today's visit, deficiencies cited. Exit interview and a copy of report and appeal rights was emailed.

2024-11-21
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Cheyenne Ratajczak
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak conducted an unannounced case management visit on 11/21/2024. This visit is to confirm ORDERS TO INDIVIDUAL FOR IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM ALL FACILITIES. LPA met with caregiver Walesi Vakararawa and stated the purpose of visit. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion effective 11/21/2024 and S1 is excluded and cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders the facility to remove S1 from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided on this date. A signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these forms .

2024-05-02
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · DeAnna Williams-Lyons
Read raw inspector notes

On May 2, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to conduct a post-licensing visit. LPA met with Walesi Vakarawai caregiver and informed her the reason for the visit. During the last visit, LPA noticed the washer and dryer was not placed in the area it is supposed to go. LPA informed the administrator that LPA would be back to see if it was in the area it is supposed to be. When LPA arrived a caregiver allowed entry into the home. LPA noticed the washer and dryer was in fact in the area it is supposed to be. LPA asked the caregiver how it was going and did they need anything. Caregiver said everything was going well and had no questions. The facility now has 5 residents living in the home. No known issues. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to Walesi.

2024-03-19
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · DeAnna Williams-Lyons
Read raw inspector notes

, On March 19, 2024, at 9am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived announced to conduct a Pre-licensing inspection. LPA met with Angelina, the administrator and informed her the reason for the visit. The administrator's certificate is valid and expires 2/18/2025. The home was 65 degrees F. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, and kitchen. In the kitchen area, cabinets and drawers were reviewed. Knives and sharp objects were reviewed to ensure that they were locked and made inaccessible to the residents at all times. LPA observed there to be a sufficient amount of 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured at 107 degrees F. There’s appropriate lighting throughout the facility. Living room, dining room, and areas designated for resident use were toured. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be sufficient and in good repair. Resident bedrooms and bathrooms were toured. There are 6 Bedrooms and 2 bathrooms for residents. All rooms had the required items of furniture. Window screens were on and in good repair. Bathrooms were clean, sanitary and odorless and consisted of grab bars and non-skid mats. The sink, toilet, bathtub and shower operate properly. The facility has a sufficient supply of linens, towels, bedding, etc. for residents in care. First aid kit was present and included the required scissors, tweezers, thermometer and guide. To continue see 809-C.. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 . Fire alarms, smoke alarms, and carbon monoxide detectors operate properly. Fire extinguisher is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA inspected the exterior grounds of this facility. There are no bodies of water on the premises. The perimeter fence, side gates, and latches were in good repair. Passageways are free of obstruction and potential hazards. was not present. Toxic substances, laundry and cleaning supplies are inaccessible. There’s a centralized storage area for resident’s medication. Medication cabinet was locked . Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no violations were observed during this visit An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to Angelina.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Same operator group

Other facilities under this operator

Legacy Senior Care LLC — as recorded on state license extracts. Each facility still has its own inspection history.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.