Arizona · Tucson

Hacienda de Luna Assisted Living LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(520) 989-3818
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 27% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 10-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Nov 2025
Last citation
Nov 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Hacienda de Luna Assisted Living LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Hacienda de Luna Assisted Living LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
54th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
65th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: NOV 2024. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
NOV 2024
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2025-11-18
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Hacienda de Luna Assisted Living LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2024-11-05
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan, dated July 26, 2024, for personal care services including medication administration. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a list of medication orders, dated July 24, 2024, which included the following: - "Losartan Potassium, 1 Tablet Oral 1 times a day for hypertension (100 MG tablet), Give one tablet by mouth daily for high blood pressure. Hold if SBP is less than 100." 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed an electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) dated November 2024. The eMAR documented the following: - "Losartan 100 MG, take 1 tablet by mouth once daily for hypertension," had been administered to R2 on each day between November 1, 2024 and November 5, 2024. However, documentation of R2's systolic blood pressure prior to each administered dose was not available for review. 4. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged R2's Losartan had not been administered in compliance with the available medication order.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the hot water temperature was maintained between 95 \'b0F and 120 \'b0F in areas of the assisted living facility used by residents. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed the water temperature measured at 131.6\'b0 F in a resident's private bathroom. 2. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the hot water temperatures had not been maintained between 95 \'b0F and 120 \'b0F in an area of the assisted living facility used by residents.

2023-10-10
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure, for means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, the means of exiting controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A documentation review of the license issued by the Department revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a sliding glass door in the living room. The door did not control egress and was equipped with a door alarm to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. However, the magnet was missing and the door alarm did not sound when the door was opened. 3. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort which did not control or alert employees of the egress of the resident. E1 immediately installed a new door alarm and verified it was functioning.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a refrigerator used by an assisted living facility to store food contained a thermometer, accurate to plus or minus 3\'b0 F, which posed a health and safety risk if the refrigerator was not maintained at a proper temperature. Findings include: 1. During the facility tour with E1 and E2, the Compliance Officer observed a refrigerator in the kitchen of the facility. The refrigerator contained a thermometer, however, the ethanol tube was detached from the scale and the thermometer could not be read. 2. During the facility tour with E1 and E2, the Compliance Officer observed a refrigerator in a storage room adjacent to the kitchen. The refrigerator contained a thermometer, however, the thermometer read 70 degrees Farenheit and appeared to be non-functional. 3. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the refrigerators in the facility did not have accurate thermometers. E2 replaced both thermometers during the on-site inspection, and both refrigerators were re-checked at 40 degrees Farenheit.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.