Aging With Dignity.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-06-24Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-10-17Complaint InvestigationR9-10-803.B.3 · 2 findings
“Based on observation, record, review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a designated caregiver was present on the assisted living facility's premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager was not present on the assisted living facility premises. The deficient practice posed a risk as no individual was designated to act on behalf of the governing authority in the onsite management of the assisted living facility. Findings include: 1. Upon arrival at the facility, the Compliance Officer was greeted by E2. E2 was the only employee at the facility. 2. A documentation review of the manager designation form, revealed that E2 was not listed as an authorized designated manager in the absence of E1. 3. E1 acknowledged, no manager or designee was present on the assisted living facility's premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager was not present on the assisted living facility premises.”
“Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis before or within seven calendars after the resident's date of occupancy as specified in R9-10-113. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A record review of R1's medical record revealed, documentation of a TB screening and risk assessment form, was not available for review for R1. 2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedure titled, "Infection Control" stated, "2. The manager shall ensure that a resident provides evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis before or within seven calendar days of the resident's date of occupancy. 3. Employment or admission will be contingent upon compliance with the screening parameters of the policy." 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis (TB) was not provided for R1.”
2025-07-22Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Surprise.
Other memory care facilities near Surprise with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience


