Tramonto Assisted Living.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-04-09Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-808.A.3.c · 1 finding
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that included the frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident’s needs were not being met. Findings include: 1. A review of R2’s medical records revealed R2’s current signed service plan was dated February 23, 2026. 2. A review of R2’s medical records revealed R2’s service plan listed R2 received the following services: Dressing Laundry However, the services listed above did not include a frequency. 3. In an interview, E1 reported R2 received dressing and laundry services and acknowledged there was not a frequency for those services in the service plan. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and E3 and no additional information was provided.”
2023-12-06Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 2 findings
“Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who either had a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) \'a7 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. \'a7 36-446.06. Finding include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed E1's manager's license conspicuously posted in the facility. 2. A review of E1's personnel record revealed a manager's license with an expiration date of June 30, 2023. 3. A review of the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers (NCIA Board) website reflected E1's license was issued April 4, 1996 and expired on June 30, 2023. 4. In an interview, E1 reported being unaware E1's manager's license was expired.”
“Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated September 9, 2023, which reflected R1 received medication administration services. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated December 2023. R1's December 2023 MAR documented R1 was administered "Rosuvastatin 10 mg (milligrams) one tablet at 8 pm" from December 1, 2023 to December 5, 2023. 3. The Compliance Officer observed R1's medications, which included "Rosuvastatin". 4. In an interview, E1 reported being unaware a medication order for "Rosuvastatin" was not included in R1's medical record. No medication order for "Rosuvastatin" was provided for review at the time of the survey.”
Other facilities in Phoenix.
Other memory care facilities near Phoenix with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



